Mild Hip Dysplasia

February 23, 2019 updated by: Rafael J. Sierra, M.D., Mayo Clinic

Periacetabular Osteotomy Versus Arthroscopic Management of Mild Hip Dysplasia: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Hip dysplasia is a complex problem that exists on a spectrum from mild to severe disease. Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) remains the gold standard for most patients with dysplasia; however, the procedure is quite invasive making the decision to proceed in cases of mild disease difficult. Hip arthroscopy (HA) is an alternative minimally invasive technique that can be used to address mild dysplasia. Nevertheless, HA has less capability for correction and in rare instances can exacerbate instability in the dysplastic hip. There is a paucity of data examining outcomes between these two treatment strategies for this challenging problem.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The Bernese periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) remains the gold standard for treatment of symptomatic developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in most patients with closed triradiate cartilage. First developed by Ganz in 1984, this technique utilizes 4 osteotomies to completely mobilize the acetabular fragment 1. Although a technically demanding procedure, it allows optimal correction in all planes and maintains integrity of the posterior column, enabling early weight bearing and mobilization. Several groups have confirmed the long-term efficacy of this joint preservation procedure with a recent report from the inventing institution documented impressive survivorship up to 30 years after surgery 2. Treatment with PAO is more controversial for mild forms of dysplasia where the lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) is 18° - 25° and/or the Tӧnnis angle is 8° - 15°. In these patients the delta correction is more limited, thus creating a more unpredictable result with equally invasive surgery.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of symptomatic mild DDH
  • Lateral center-edge angle 18° - 25° and/or Tӧnnis angle 8° - 15°
  • Skeletally mature
  • Age 18 - 45
  • Tonnis Grade 0 or 1 osteoarthritis (minimal or no arthritis)
  • Ability to receive a standard of care preoperative MRI arthrogram of the hip

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant women
  • Neurogenic dysplasia
  • Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease
  • Previous surgery about the hip including previous hip arthroscopy to address intra-articular pathology

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Hip Arthroscopy (HA)
This approach addresses intraarticular pathology in the form of labral tears and cartilage that are often concomitant with DDH 3. Furthermore, capsular plication can be performed through HA to reduce instability of the joint.
Intraarticular pathology in the form of labral tears and cartilage that are often concomitant with DDH
NO_INTERVENTION: Periacetabular Osteootmy (PAO)
The Bernese periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) remains the gold standard for treatment of symptomatic developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in most patients with closed triradiate cartilage. First developed by Ganz in 1984, this technique utilizes 4 osteotomies to completely mobilize the acetabular fragment 1. Although a technically demanding procedure, it allows optimal correction in all planes and maintains integrity of the posterior column, enabling early weight bearing and mobilization.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12)
Time Frame: 1 year
Outcome
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rafael J Sierra, Mayo Clinic

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

January 11, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

January 11, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 9, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

May 21, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 26, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 23, 2019

Last Verified

February 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hip Dysplasia

Clinical Trials on Hip Arthroscopy

3
Subscribe