Refractive Corneal Cross-linking for Progressive Keratoconus

A Prospective, Controlled Study of Refractive Corneal Cross-linking for Progressive Keratoconus

Young patients with keratoconus face two problems: disease progression and corneal shape irregularity. Both underlie the 20% rate of corneal transplantation in keratoconics required to maintain useful vision.

Corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) is a now the gold-standard treatment to halt disease progression. The aim is to strengthen the cornea to prevent further shape deterioration. For patients whose quality of vision has already suffered, standard CXL can generally only prevent further deterioration, rather than improving vision. Refractive CXL, a new iteration of CXL in which a bespoke treatment pattern is applied to the cornea, aims to smooth out surface irregularities thereby improving vision.

This primary objective of this study is to compare the visual outcome in patients with progressive keratoconus treated with refractive CXL, as compared with historical controls treated with standard CXL.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Irregular astigmatism (irregular corneal shape leading to irregular focus) is a common cause of failure to achieve an adequate spectacle correction for many patients with corneal disease. For patients affected, rigid gas permeable contact lenses are the only means of visual rehabilitation. Not all patients tolerate rigid contact lens wear, and those that do are often uncomfortable and have a restricted wearing time.

Keratoconus, in which the corneal shape becomes progressively steeper and more irregular in the 2nd to 4th decades of life, is a common cause of irregular astigmatism. Disease progression in keratoconus can be stabilised with corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL), effective in 90% of cases. Pre-existing irregular astigmatism often remains after CXL, with many patients requiring rigid gas permeable contact lenses to regain good vision.

The investigators have recently demonstrated improvements in vision following simultaneous combined cross-linking with laser refractive surgery (TransPRK/CXL). The excimer laser is used to create a smoother, more regular focusing shape on the cornea to improve the quality of vision achieved in spectacles. Although effective, the downsides of using this approach are both the cost and limited availability of excimer laser equipment in the National Health Service (NHS) in the United Kingdom. Also, excimer laser smoothing works by removing corneal tissue. It is not yet known whether this tissue removal will have any detrimental effect on corneal shape stability post CXL.

As a cheaper and potentially more widely accessible alternative, refractive CXL aims to regularise the corneal surface by applying a bespoke treatment pattern based on pre-operative corneal surface shape (topography) scans. At least two-thirds of patients undergoing standard CXL already have impaired vision at the time treatment. The investigators are aiming to offer these patients both long-term stability of their keratoconus and an improvement in vision in a single treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

53

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • London, United Kingdom, EC1V 2PD
        • Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with progressive stage I - III keratoconus
  • Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) < 0.00 logMAR

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients under the age of 18 years
  • Active ocular surface disease
  • Minimum corneal thickness < 375 µm
  • Vulnerable groups
  • Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Refractive CXL
Tomography-customised CXL
As for standard CXL, following mechanical removal of the corneal surface layer (epithelium), 0.1% riboflavin drops will be applied every 2 minutes for 10 minutes prior to ultraviolet A (UVA) irradiation - UVA power, distribution and timing as determined by analysis of Pentacam tomography scans. A bandage contact lens will be applied to encourage regrowth of the corneal surface and reduce post-operative pain.
Other Names:
  • Riboflavin drops (drug): Vibex Rapid (Avedro Inc.)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in corrected distance visual acuity
Time Frame: 24 months
LogMAR corrected vision in spectacles
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in uncorrected distance visual acuity
Time Frame: 24 months
LogMAR uncorrected vision without spectacles
24 months
Manifest refraction
Time Frame: 24 months
Spectacle prescription
24 months
Tomography
Time Frame: 24 months
Corneal Pentacam indices
24 months
Rates of keratitis
Time Frame: 24 months
Complications of CXL
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Daniel M Gore, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 27, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

November 27, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 8, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 8, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

May 21, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 8, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 1, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Keratoconus

Clinical Trials on Customised CXL

3
Subscribe