Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia: Follow-Up

August 31, 2021 updated by: University of Aarhus

Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia: The Effect of Follow-Up Programs for Detection of Relapse. A Nordic Population-Based Cohort Study

Over the past decades, advances in treatment have led to an increasing number of children who survive cancer, resulting in a growing population of childhood cancer survivors. After end of cancer treatment on common protocols survivors are enrolled in non-harmonized follow-up programs with frequent visits and blood samples. However, the evidence for the value of these follow-up programs with respect to the effect on detecting relapse and the effects on overall survival is scarce.

The aim of the study is to give a comprehensive description of the detection mode of relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL), including symptoms and blood test results. Further, we aim to evaluate if the mode of detection affects survival.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Investigators have identified a cohort of children with B-precursor ALL and T-ALL enrolled in the Nordic Society of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology (NOPHO) ALL-92, ALL-2000 and ALL-2008 trials and experienced a relapse or an SMN as the first event after cessation of maintenance therapy (368 patients). From medical charts and blood test results it will be decided whether the relapse/SMN was diagnosed at a routine visit (including routine blood tests) or if the relapse was diagnosed because of symptoms at a non-scheduled visit or blood test.

As the NOPHO database probably is one of the most complete databases globally, it is an advantage to perform this study as a NOPHO study.

Results of this population based relapse study will provide an evidence-based background for planning optimal and relevant follow-up programs for children after therapy of ALL treated according to contemporary Nordic ALL protocols.

The study is important and relevant in the light of today's high ALL cure rates and a need for optimal follow-up programs after cessation of ALL treatment and possible prediction of relapse.

The timing of the project is an increased focus on the clinical relevance of routine clinical follow-up of patients treated for cancer.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

277

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Aarhus N, Denmark, 8200
        • Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital
      • Turku, Finland, 20521
        • Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Turku University Hospital
      • Reykjavík, Iceland, 101
        • The National University Hospital of Iceland
      • Tromsø, Norway, 9038
        • Department of Childhood Oncology, University Hospital Tromsø
      • Stockholm, Sweden, 171 76
        • Department of Paediatric Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 year to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population will be identified in the Nordic Society of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology ALL database.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • diagnosed with pre-B or T-cell ALL in the Nordic countries (Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Finland or Iceland)
  • included in the NOPHO ALL-92, ALL-2000 or ALL-2008 trials
  • treated in a Paediatric Department
  • developing a relapse/SMN after cessation of maintenance therapy before 31st of December 2016

Exclusion Criteria:

  • hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in first complete remission

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Detection mode
Time Frame: Investigators will review medical charts up to three months before the diagnosis of a relapse. Relapses will be categorized to be diagnosed by either a routine visit or an extra scheduled visit.
The proportion of relapses diagnosed at a routine visit vs. relapses diagnosed at an extra scheduled visit.
Investigators will review medical charts up to three months before the diagnosis of a relapse. Relapses will be categorized to be diagnosed by either a routine visit or an extra scheduled visit.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Survival
Time Frame: Time-to-Event measures (up to 23 years from date of relapse until censoring)
Survival, by detection mode (routine or extra visit)
Time-to-Event measures (up to 23 years from date of relapse until censoring)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Henrik Schrøder, Professor, Aarhus University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 4, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

January 20, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 17, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 1, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

June 4, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 1, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 31, 2021

Last Verified

June 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Recurrence

Clinical Trials on Mode of relapse/SMN detection

3
Subscribe