Pragmatic Investigation of Volume Targeted Ventilation-1 (PIVOT-1)

Pragmatic Investigation of Volume Targeted Ventilation-1 (PIVOT-1)

This proposal will test the feasibility of implementing an assist volume control ventilation protocol in patients receiving mechanical ventilation in the medical intensive care unit. The trial will consist of a before-and-after trial design of block assignment to either adaptive pressure control (baseline) or assist volume control .

This is a feasibility study looking at the management of patients in the ventilator.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Respiratory Failure; Ventilator Lung; Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
• Intervention / Treatment: Procedure: mode of mechanical ventilation

Detailed Description

Over the course of 6 weeks, a before-and-after trial design of adaptive pressure control and assist volume control will be conducted.

Pre-trial planning phase: study protocols will be reviewed with key stakeholders (respiratory therapy providers and medical teams)

Weeks 1-2: data will be collected on our current adaptive pressure control ventilator protocol.

Week 3: The investigators will implement an assist volume control protocol. . Patients already on mechanical ventilation will be converted to assist volume control; however, these patients will not be included in the primary analysis.In accordance with the Consolidated Framework For Implementation Research (CFIR) approach, after 1 week of assist volume control the investigators will engage in quantitative and qualitative feedback with care providers to identify facilitators and barriers of assist volume control implementation.

Week 4-6: If the investigators identify substantial barriers, the investigators will pause and alter the protocol. If not, the investigators will continue assist volume control for an additional 2 weeks.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 139
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • North Carolina
    • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157
      • Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Acute Respiratory Failure requiring mechanical ventilation medical intensive care unit admission

Exclusion Criteria:

chronic mechanical ventilation clinician use of non-volume-targeted ventilation as initial mode

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Non-Randomized
• Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Adaptive Pressure Control; The Adaptive Pressure Control arm is the baseline mode/protocol for medical intensive care unit mechanical ventilation	Procedure: mode of mechanical ventilation; Adaptive Pressure Control mechanical ventilation is a dual controlled mode that is designed to auto-control flow and minimize inspiratory pressure while delivering a provider-determined tidal volume. Assist Volume Control mechanical ventilation is a mode in which the respiratory care provider determines patient tidal volume and flow.
Active Comparator: Assist Volume Control; The assist volume control arm is the new protocol that will be implemented and tested for feasibility	Procedure: mode of mechanical ventilation; Adaptive Pressure Control mechanical ventilation is a dual controlled mode that is designed to auto-control flow and minimize inspiratory pressure while delivering a provider-determined tidal volume. Assist Volume Control mechanical ventilation is a mode in which the respiratory care provider determines patient tidal volume and flow.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Percentage of patients receiving Assist Volume Control	The primary outcome for the PIVOT-1 pilot is feasibility of Assist Volume Control implementation. We define feasibility in this study as 80% of patients receiving Assist Volume Control within 1 hour of initiation of intensive care unit mechanical ventilation	1 hour

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
assist volume control duration	A secondary feasibility outcome will be >70% of ventilated time on Assist Volume Control during the first 24 hours of mechanical ventilation.	24 hours
Percentage of mode crossover	A secondary feasibility outcome will include <10% crossover to the alternative mode	2 weeks
exhaled tidal volume	exhaled tidal volume will be compared between modes using data extracted from the critical care data capsule.	2 weeks
Number of ventilator free days	vent free days will be compared between the modes using data from the critical care data analytics platform	28 days
intensive care length of stay	intensive care unit length of stay will be compared between the modes using data from the critical care data analytics platform	28 days

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Wake Forest University Health Sciences
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Kevin Gibbs, MD, Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009 Aug 7;4:50. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-50.
• Esteban A, Frutos-Vivar F, Muriel A, Ferguson ND, Penuelas O, Abraira V, Raymondos K, Rios F, Nin N, Apezteguia C, Violi DA, Thille AW, Brochard L, Gonzalez M, Villagomez AJ, Hurtado J, Davies AR, Du B, Maggiore SM, Pelosi P, Soto L, Tomicic V, D'Empaire G, Matamis D, Abroug F, Moreno RP, Soares MA, Arabi Y, Sandi F, Jibaja M, Amin P, Koh Y, Kuiper MA, Bulow HH, Zeggwagh AA, Anzueto A. Evolution of mortality over time in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 Jul 15;188(2):220-30. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201212-2169OC.
• Semler MW, Self WH, Wanderer JP, Ehrenfeld JM, Wang L, Byrne DW, Stollings JL, Kumar AB, Hughes CG, Hernandez A, Guillamondegui OD, May AK, Weavind L, Casey JD, Siew ED, Shaw AD, Bernard GR, Rice TW; SMART Investigators and the Pragmatic Critical Care Research Group. Balanced Crystalloids versus Saline in Critically Ill Adults. N Engl J Med. 2018 Mar 1;378(9):829-839. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1711584. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
• Yoshida T, Fujino Y, Amato MB, Kavanagh BP. Fifty Years of Research in ARDS. Spontaneous Breathing during Mechanical Ventilation. Risks, Mechanisms, and Management. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Apr 15;195(8):985-992. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201604-0748CP.
• Wunsch H, Wagner J, Herlim M, Chong DH, Kramer AA, Halpern SD. ICU occupancy and mechanical ventilator use in the United States. Crit Care Med. 2013 Dec;41(12):2712-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318298a139.
• Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network; Brower RG, Matthay MA, Morris A, Schoenfeld D, Thompson BT, Wheeler A. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2000 May 4;342(18):1301-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005043421801.
• Mireles-Cabodevila E, Chatburn RL. Work of breathing in adaptive pressure control continuous mandatory ventilation. Respir Care. 2009 Nov;54(11):1467-72.
• Shah FA, Girard TD, Yende S. Limiting sedation for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome - time to wake up. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2017 Feb;23(1):45-51. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000382.
• Branson RD, Chatburn RL. Controversies in the critical care setting. Should adaptive pressure control modes be utilized for virtually all patients receiving mechanical ventilation? Respir Care. 2007 Apr;52(4):478-85; discussion 485-8.
• Figueroa-Casas JB, Montoya R. Effect of Tidal Volume Size and Its Delivery Mode on Patient-Ventilator Dyssynchrony. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Dec;13(12):2207-2214. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201605-362OC.
• Kallet RH, Campbell AR, Dicker RA, Katz JA, Mackersie RC. Work of breathing during lung-protective ventilation in patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a comparison between volume and pressure-regulated breathing modes. Respir Care. 2005 Dec;50(12):1623-31.
• Writing Group for the PReVENT Investigators; Simonis FD, Serpa Neto A, Binnekade JM, Braber A, Bruin KCM, Determann RM, Goekoop GJ, Heidt J, Horn J, Innemee G, de Jonge E, Juffermans NP, Spronk PE, Steuten LM, Tuinman PR, de Wilde RBP, Vriends M, Gama de Abreu M, Pelosi P, Schultz MJ. Effect of a Low vs Intermediate Tidal Volume Strategy on Ventilator-Free Days in Intensive Care Unit Patients Without ARDS: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2018 Nov 13;320(18):1872-1880. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.14280.
• Serpa Neto A, Simonis FD, Barbas CS, Biehl M, Determann RM, Elmer J, Friedman G, Gajic O, Goldstein JN, Horn J, Juffermans NP, Linko R, de Oliveira RP, Sundar S, Talmor D, Wolthuis EK, de Abreu MG, Pelosi P, Schultz MJ. Association between tidal volume size, duration of ventilation, and sedation needs in patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome: an individual patient data meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2014 Jul;40(7):950-7. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3318-4. Epub 2014 May 9.
• Casey JD, Janz DR, Russell DW, Vonderhaar DJ, Joffe AM, Dischert KM, Brown RM, Zouk AN, Gulati S, Heideman BE, Lester MG, Toporek AH, Bentov I, Self WH, Rice TW, Semler MW; PreVent Investigators and the Pragmatic Critical Care Research Group. Bag-Mask Ventilation during Tracheal Intubation of Critically Ill Adults. N Engl J Med. 2019 Feb 28;380(9):811-821. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1812405. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
• Zuidgeest MGP, Goetz I, Groenwold RHH, Irving E, van Thiel GJMW, Grobbee DE; GetReal Work Package 3. Series: Pragmatic trials and real world evidence: Paper 1. Introduction. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Aug;88:7-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.12.023. Epub 2017 May 24.
• Meinecke AK, Welsing P, Kafatos G, Burke D, Trelle S, Kubin M, Nachbaur G, Egger M, Zuidgeest M; work package 3 of the GetReal consortium. Series: Pragmatic trials and real world evidence: Paper 8. Data collection and management. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Nov;91:13-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.07.003. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
• Sjoding MW, Gong MN, Haas CF, Iwashyna TJ. Evaluating Delivery of Low Tidal Volume Ventilation in Six ICUs Using Electronic Health Record Data. Crit Care Med. 2019 Jan;47(1):56-61. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003469.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): September 9, 2019
• Primary Completion (Actual): November 12, 2019
• Study Completion (Actual): February 20, 2020

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: April 8, 2019
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: April 9, 2019
• First Posted (Actual): April 10, 2019

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): July 7, 2023
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: July 5, 2023
• Last Verified: January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Respiratory Tract Diseases; Respiration Disorders; Lung Diseases; Infant, Newborn, Diseases; Lung Injury; Infant, Premature, Diseases; Respiratory Insufficiency; Respiratory Distress Syndrome; Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn; Acute Lung Injury
• Other Study ID Numbers: IRB00055128

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: NO

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No