Augmenting Exposure Therapy With Self-Distancing

April 14, 2020 updated by: Emily Bilek, University of Michigan

Anxiety is prevalent, impairing, and costly in childhood. Evidence-based treatments for pediatric anxiety exist; however, as many as 40-60% of youth do not demonstrate optimal response. By identifying psychological factors that potentiate symptom severity and treatment response, it may be possible to strengthen these factors to treat, or even prevent the development of youth emotional disorders.

This study aims to examine whether the combination of Exposure and Self-Distancing is a feasible, acceptable, and efficient intervention for increasing perseverance in the face of exposures. This will be measured by child and parent report of treatment acceptability, examination of attendance and dropout rates, as well as participant and therapist report of participant engagement during exposures.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
        • University of Michigan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

7 years to 17 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Parent or guardian willing to give informed consent to participate
  • Children who give written or oral assent
  • Ages 7 and older to under 18 years old
  • Has a historical anxiety diagnosis (diagnosed within the last year either within a clinical or clinical research setting) and have moderate or greater levels of current anxiety symptoms
  • Current or past history of elevated symptoms of depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder and posttraumatic stress are allowable, but anxiety must be the chief complaint
  • No evidence of acute risk due to suicidal intentions or behaviors in the past 6 months.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Currently receiving cognitive behavioral therapy or any other form of psychotherapy
  • Have elevated symptoms of bipolar I/II disorder, schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder, schizophreniform disorder, psychosis Not otherwise specified (NOS), mental retardation, severe behavioral concerns, or autism
  • History of current substance/alcohol abuse/dependence (Past history abuse is allowable if in remission for greater than 1 year)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Exposure Therapy and Self Distancing
All subjects will have 2 introduction sessions and then receive Exposure therapy with Self-Distancing (2 weeks) following Exposure therapy without Self-Distancing (2 weeks) followed by 2 more weeks of Exposure therapy with Self-Distancing.
Weeks 1 and 2 will be introductory sessions (background, rationale, motivational enhancement); Weeks 3 & 4 will have Exposure therapy with Self-Distancing; Weeks 5 & 6 will have Exposure therapy only; Weeks 7 & 8 will have Exposure therapy with Self-Distancing;

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acceptability of Self Distancing with exposure therapy
Time Frame: Week 8
Treatment Acceptability Questionnaire version for the child and parent. Five Item scale (a score of 1 indicates that the care was not at all acceptable and a score of 7 would indicate a high level of acceptability). The treatment will be determined to have adequate acceptability and self-reported feasibility if parent and child report mean values greater than or equal to 5.
Week 8
Feasibility of Self Distancing based on treatment completion rates
Time Frame: Week 8
Total number of sessions attended. Treatment will be determined to have adequate feasibility if participants attend, on average, greater than or equal to 70% of sessions, and high feasibility if participants attend, on average greater than or equal to 80% of sessions.
Week 8

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Treatment adherence and engagement
Time Frame: Weeks 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
The Treatment Engagement and Adherence Rating Scale (TEARS) will be used to assess subject completion of assigned homework, and engagement in in session practice by the child completing and therapist rating of exposure difficulty (0-10) and patient engagement (0-10).
Weeks 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Change in anxiety severity
Time Frame: Screening, Week 8
The Screen for Childhood Anxiety-Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED) is a 41-item parent and participant-completed tool used to measure symptoms of anxiety, including the most common symptoms of panic/somatic, generalized anxiety, separation anxiety, social phobia, and school phobia. Scores range from 0-82, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. Both individual level changes and group mean differences will be examined.
Screening, Week 8
Change in Clinical Global Impressions - Severity and improvement scale (CGI)
Time Frame: Screening, Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
This is a 2 question clinician-rated scale where the scale itself assesses overall disorder severity on a scale from 1 to 7 with 1 being "not at all" and 7 being "among the most severe cases".
Screening, Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Change in Clinical Global Impressions - Severity and improvement scale (CGI)
Time Frame: Weeks, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Only the improvement item will be completed by the parent with a score of 1 to 7 with 1 being "very much improved" and 7 being "very much worse".
Weeks, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Emily Bilek, PhD, University of Michigan

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 30, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 9, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

April 9, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 25, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 25, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

June 8, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 15, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 14, 2020

Last Verified

April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HUM00141761

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anxiety

Clinical Trials on Exposure Therapy and Self Distancing

Subscribe