Beta-blocker vs. Ic Antiarrhythmic Drug for PVC

June 19, 2018 updated by: Yong Seog Oh

Outcome of Medical Treatment for Idiopathic Premature Ventricular Complexes - Beta-blocker vs Ic Antiarrhythmic Agent; Randomized Controlled Trial

The standard medical therapy of idiopathic premature ventricular complex consists of beta blocker and Ic antiarrhythmic agent. However, the difference in the efficacy of two drugs has not been well investigated. This prospective randomized study aimed to compare the efficacy of beta-blocker and Ic antiarrhythmic agent in the treatment of symptomatic patients with idiopathic premature ventricular complex.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

A premature ventricular complex is frequently observed in routine clinical practice and patients without structural heart disease occasionally have benign outcomes. The initial therapy of symptomatic premature ventricular complex is medical treatment with beta-blocker, calcium channel blocker or antiarrhythmic agents. However, no large prospective study has been performed to identify the difference in the efficacy between drugs. The current study was designed to compare the efficacy between beta-blocker and class Ic antiarrhythmic agent. Patient with symptomatic PVC more than 6000 episode per 24 hours is included. Exclusion criteria are evidence of structural heart disease, coronary heart disease, significant bradycardia or use of a concomitant antiarrhythmic agent. Patients are randomized into beta-blocker group (propranolol) and Ic antiarrhythmic agent group (propafenone). Response to the drug is evaluated after 2 months from randomization by 24 hours Holter and questionnaire. The primary endpoint is more than 80% PVC reduction or PVC burden less than 300 beats per 24 hours. The secondary endpoint is patient's symptom evaluated by questionnaire and the number of PVCs measured in 24 hours Holter.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

350

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Seo Ch-gu
      • Seoul, Seo Ch-gu, Korea, Republic of, 137-701
        • Recruiting
        • Seoul St Mary's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • over 19 years old >6000 PVCs/24hrs

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Left ventricular ejection fraction <50% or Significant valvular disease (≥moderate) History of coronary artery disease Use of a concomitant antiarrhythmic agent Significant bradycardia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Propafenone group
Prescribtion of propafenone for the management of premature ventricular complex
prescribing propafenone for the management of premature ventricular complex
Active Comparator: Indenol group
Prescribtion of indenol for the management of premature ventricular complex
prescribing indenol for the management of premature ventricular complex

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reduction in PVC frequency on 24hrs holter
Time Frame: two months after randomization
PVC reduction of >80% or <300 beats/day
two months after randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 24, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 18, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

June 19, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 21, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 19, 2018

Last Verified

June 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Premature Ventricular Complex

Clinical Trials on Propafenone

3
Subscribe