Impact of Pacing Output and Cycle Length on QRS Morphology

November 5, 2021 updated by: Universitätsklinikum Köln

Impact of Pacing Output and Cycle Length on QRS Morphology in Ablation of Premature Ventricular Contractions

Current recommendations for pacemapping are based on expert opinion and animals models. Present study sought to evaluate the influence of different parameters of pacemapping on QRS morphology. Pacemapping is performed with different cycle length (fixed burst vs. coupling interval) and stimulation output (maximum output vs. threshold) and resulting QRS complexes are compared to clinical PVC and the standard of care to determine the optimal parameter setting in pacemapping.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Pacemapping is a common technique to determine to origin of ventricular ectopy during catheter ablation of premature ventricular contractions (PVC). During the pacemapping process an electrical pacing stimulus is applied via the ablation catheter and the resulting QRS complex is compared the clinical target PVC. The higher the consistency between the stimulated QRS complex and the clinical PVC, the nearer the catheter is located to the origin of ectopy.

Current recommendations for the execution of pacemapping are based on expert opinion and animals models. The investigators sought to assess for the first time in a clinical real life setting the different parameters for pacemapping (i.e. Cycle length and stimulation output). Therefore during the pacemapping process in routine PVC ablation pacing is performed with different cycle length (fixed burst vs. coupling interval of PVC) and different electrical output (maximum output vs. stimulation threshold). The resulting QRS morphologies are on the one hand compared to the ablation target (clinical PVC) and on the other hand to the suggest standard of care (Coupling interval at pacing threshold) to determine the optimal setting of parameters in pacemapping.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • NRW
      • Cologne, NRW, Germany, 50936
        • Recruiting
        • University Hospital Cologne
        • Contact:
          • Daniel Steven

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients undergoing PVC ablation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients <18 years
  • patients not able to consent
  • pregnancy
  • contraindication for PVC ablation
  • unavailability of vascular access
  • patients with complex congenital heart disease
  • expected hemodynamical instability during pacemapping

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: DIAGNOSTIC
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
OTHER: Additional Pacing maneuvers
In all study participants additional pacing maneuvers (cycle lenght and output) are performed
In order to determine the optimal setting for pacemapping in all participants additional pacing maneuvers (output and cycle length) are performed

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Template Matching with clinical PVC
Time Frame: Immediately during PVC ablation. No follow up intended.
Different pacing settings are applied in order to determine the optimal Consistency between paced QRS complex and clinical PVC
Immediately during PVC ablation. No follow up intended.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jakob Lüker, MD, Heart Center University of Cologne

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2021

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

February 1, 2022

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

November 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 11, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 27, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

September 29, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

November 8, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 5, 2021

Last Verified

November 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Catheter Ablation

Clinical Trials on Additional Pacing maneuvers

Subscribe