Comparative Research Among 3 Action Protocol in Other to Approach Chronic Lateral Epicondyle Tendinopathy

June 27, 2018 updated by: Universidad San Jorge
The accomplishment of a treatment with Intratissue Percutaneous Electrolysis of additional form to the accomplishment of eccentric exercises and stretching program in patients with chronic lateral epicondyle tendinopathy is more effective than the accomplishment of an additional treatment with dry needling or eccentric exercises program realized of isolated form.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Experimental study randomized with double blind, whose purpose is to compare three protocols in those who apply different protocols of physical therapy to themselves in three groups of intervention with patients with chronic lateral epicondyle tendinopathy.

There take part in this study people of both sexes, with ages between 18 and 65 years, all of them present chronic lateral epicondyle tendinopathy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

66

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Zaragoza
      • Figueruelas, Zaragoza, Spain, 50639
        • Recruiting
        • Opel España
        • Contact:
          • Rita Mª Galán Díaz, MD
          • Phone Number: +34660222284
          • Email: rmgalan@usj.es

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 18 and 65 years.
  • Patients diagnosed of chronic lateral epicondyle tendinopathy with a minimum of 3 months of evolution.
  • Pain when palpating the lateral epicondyle area.
  • Positive test in at least 1 of the following 3 clinical tests: Cozen, Thomson or Mill's
  • Have the capacity to perform all clinical tests, understand the study process, and obtain informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous history of direct trauma, fractures, joint instability, surgery or rheumatic alterations of the lateral epicondyle area.
  • Full elbow extension limited.
  • Alterations at cervical level such as: cervical radiculopathy (C4-C7), degenerative pathology in the cervical spine, exacerbated pain increase with neck movements or cervical compression.
  • Symptoms compatible with entrapment of the posterior interosseous nerve.
  • NSAID intake the week before the intervention;
  • Have received treatment with infiltration in the last year;
  • Have received physiotherapy treatment during the last month.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Group of Dry Needling

They will receive a treatment of dry needling, guided by ultrasound, together with a self-treatment program at home based on eccentric exercises and stretching.

The needle will get in the relevant zone of treatment. The punction will be realized using Hong's technique (fast in-out). Three needle insertions will be carried out in the target area during 3 seconds

Every group will receive a total of 3 treatment sessions distributed throughout 4 weeks of treatment. The program of eccentric exercises will be done by participants at home 5 days a week, two times a day.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Group of electrolysis

They will receive a treatment of Intratissue Percutaneous Electrolysis, guided by ultrasound, together with a self-treatment program at home based on eccentric exercises and stretching.

The needle will get in the relevant zone of treatment. The punction will be realized simulating Hong's technique (fast in-out). Three needle insertions will be carried out in the target area during 3 seconds and 3mA each one.

Every group will receive a total of 3 treatment sessions distributed throughout 4 weeks of treatment. The program of eccentric exercises will be done by participants at home 5 days a week, two times a day.
SHAM_COMPARATOR: Control Group
They will receive a treatment of punction sham, guided by ultrasound, together with a self-treatment program at home based on eccentric exercises and stretching.
Every group will receive a total of 3 treatment sessions distributed throughout 4 weeks of treatment. The program of eccentric exercises will be done by participants at home 5 days a week, two times a day.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in quality of life by DASH
Time Frame: Pre-intervention; Post-intervention (1 week after); Follow up (26 and 52 weeks after)
The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Outcome Measure is a 30-item, self-report questionnaire designed to help describe the disability experienced by people with upper-limb disorders and also to monitor changes in symptoms and function over time. The DASH Outcome Measure contains one optional, four-item modules intended to measure symptoms and function in workers whose jobs require a high degree of physical performance.
Pre-intervention; Post-intervention (1 week after); Follow up (26 and 52 weeks after)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain, as measured by Visual Analog Scale
Time Frame: Pre-intervention; Intervention (4 weeks); Post-intervention (1 week after), Follow up (26 and 52 weeks after)
Participants will be explained that a score of 0 indicates the absence of pain whereas a score of 10 represents the maximum tolerable pain.
Pre-intervention; Intervention (4 weeks); Post-intervention (1 week after), Follow up (26 and 52 weeks after)
Pressure pain thresholds (PPTs)
Time Frame: Pre-intervention; Intervention (4 weeks); Post-intervention (1 week after), Follow up (26 and 52 weeks after)
Level of pressure tolerated by the patient just before feeling pain. The pressure is done with a digital algometer Type II(Somedic). PPTS will be assessed bilaterally in extensor carpi radialis brevis tendon and tibialis anterior muscle.
Pre-intervention; Intervention (4 weeks); Post-intervention (1 week after), Follow up (26 and 52 weeks after)
Pain free grip strength
Time Frame: Pre-intervention; Intervention (4 weeks); Post-intervention (1 week after), Follow up (26 and 52 weeks after)
Grip strength before feeling pain. The tool used is a hydraulic hand dynamometer (Baseline). Subjects will be asked to gradually increase the grip strength while the elbow is extended and pronated and arm alongside of the body. They will be asked to stop when pain is felt. We will take three measures with each elbow.
Pre-intervention; Intervention (4 weeks); Post-intervention (1 week after), Follow up (26 and 52 weeks after)
Thickness of the tendon, as measured by ultrasound scan
Time Frame: Pre-intervention; Post-intervention (1 week after); Follow up (26 and 52 weeks after)
Tendon structure
Pre-intervention; Post-intervention (1 week after); Follow up (26 and 52 weeks after)
Hypervascularity, as measured by ultrasound scan
Time Frame: Pre-intervention; Post-intervention (1 week after); Follow up (26 and 52 weeks after)
Tendon structure
Pre-intervention; Post-intervention (1 week after); Follow up (26 and 52 weeks after)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rita Mª Galán Díaz, MD, Universidad San Jorge
  • Study Director: Pablo Herrero Gallego, PhD, Universidad San Jorge
  • Study Director: Cleofas Rodríguez Blanco, PhD, University of Seville

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

April 9, 2018

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2019

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

April 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 14, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 27, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

June 28, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

June 28, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 27, 2018

Last Verified

March 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tendinopathy

Clinical Trials on Group of Dry Needling

3
Subscribe