Natural Cycles With Spontaneous Versus Induced Ovulation in FET

July 17, 2018 updated by: Istituto Clinico Humanitas

Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfers: a Comparison Between Natural Cycles With Spontaneous or Induced Ovulation

In recent years, frozen-thawed embryo transfer procedure (FET) has been widely used to increase the cumulative pregnancy rate per IVF-cycle: which is the best preparation protocol remains a matter of debate.

A retrospective analysis was conducted between 2012-2017. The aim was comparing clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) of pure natural cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfer (NC-FET) versus natural cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfer with hCG-triggered ovulation (mNC-FET).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Compared to repeated oocyte retrieval procedure, frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) has been widely used to increase the cumulative pregnancy rate per IVF-cycle, with demonstrated superiority in preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and improving cost-efficiency and time to pregnancy.

It is controversial whether triggering ovulation of the dominant follicle using human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) may benefit or reduce embryo implantation, when compared with a natural cycle environment. Unfavourable clinical outcomes of controlled ovarian stimulation have been reported by recently published studies, compared to the spontaneous LH surge.

This study aimed to compare the effectiveness in terms of better clinical pregnancy rates (CPR) of pure natural cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfer (NC-FET) versus natural cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfer modified by HCG administration\with hCG-triggered ovulation (mNC-FET).

A retrospective analysis was conducted between 2012-2017. In patients with regular ovulatory cycles, the timing of embryo thawing and transferring was based on spontaneous LH surge (NC-FET). Patients attended for ultrasound evaluation of the dominant follicle from Day 8 to 10 of their menstrual cycle (depending on cycle length), detecting luteinizing hormone (LH) surge in urine/ taking an ovulation test for urinary LH measurement. In selected cases, a serum assays of LH, progesterone and estradioI has been further obtained. When the endometrial thickness reached 8 mm and dominant follicle 16-20 mm in diameter, hCG was administered in absence of urinary LH surge. Embryo thawing and transfer was planned 7 days after LH surge or HCG administration, whether G5 or G6 blastocyst. Exogenous progesterone supplementation started 2 days after hCG administration versus the same day of embryo transfer procedure in NC- ET. To limit potential confounders, only single blastocyst transfer cycles were included, vitrified on Days 5 or 6, excluding PGT-a (Pre Gestational Test for aneuploydia) cycles and cleavage stage embryo transfers. A unilevel and multi level logistic regression analysis was conducted using Stata Software versione15.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

2866

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 41 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

2866 cycles were included in the analysis. To limit potential confounders, only single blastocyst transfer cycles were included, vitrified on Days 5 or 6, excluding PGT-a cycles and cleavage stage embryo transfers.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • only single blastocyst transfer cycles were included

Exclusion Criteria:

  • PGT-a cycles and cleavage stage embryo transfers

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
NC-FET
pure natural cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfer
mNC-FET
modified natural cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfer by hCG administration
Thawed embryo transfer with ovulation triggered by hCG
Other Names:
  • Gonasi HP 5000 UI or Ovitrelle 250mg

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
CPR in NCFET vs mNCFET
Time Frame: 2012-2017
compare the effectiveness in terms of better clinical pregnancy rates (CPR) of pure natural cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfer (NC-FET) versus natural cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfer modified by HCG administration
2012-2017

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 15, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 26, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 26, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

July 10, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 19, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 17, 2018

Last Verified

June 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • xxxx2018

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Embryo Transfer

Clinical Trials on hCG administration before embryo transfer

Subscribe