Bridging Recovery Allies in Virtual Environments (BRAVE)

April 12, 2019 updated by: Hilary Nicole Touchett, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Bridging Recovery Allies in Virtual Environments (BRAVE)-Understanding Feasibility and Acceptability of Using Virtual Environments for Social Communication in Persons With TBI

The Bridging Recovery Allies in Virtual Environments (BRAVE) study aims to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of implementing a virtual environment (VE) social support group for social communication training among adults with traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

13

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77584
        • TIRR Memorial Hermann

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • subjects with a traumatic brain injury
  • between the age of 18 and 80
  • living in the community
  • able to read and speak English,
  • are more than 1-year post-injury
  • are accessible by phone,
  • report independent computer usage over the last 6 months
  • have access to a computer meeting minimum specifications for the Learning in Virtual Environments (LIVE) platform (requires Windows)
  • have broadband Internet connection,
  • achieve a Galveston Orientation Assessment Test (GOAT) score >75 to ensure appropriate levels of cognition for the study
  • and score >93.8 on the Western Battery Aphasia-Revised (WAB-R) scale to indicate sufficient communicative abilities to participate in a social support group and exit interview group.
  • able to understand and independently consent for the study and provide written consent prior to enrollment in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

- verbal communication impairments will be excluded as measured by the WAB-R, as this study intends to focus on persons with social communication deficits rather than verbal deficits.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Virtual Envrionment for Social Communication

Once the intervention begins, participants will meet online from home for one-hour sessions twice a week (twelve sessions over six weeks).

Weekly sessions will follow a standardized format:

  • 15 minutes- Social support group (guided discussion of experiences related to weekly topic)
  • 20 minutes- Didactic instruction
  • 15 minutes- Role playing
  • 10 minutes- Debriefing and group feedback

Once the Virtual Envrionment for Social Communication intervention begins, participants will meet online from home for one-hour sessions twice a week (twelve sessions over six weeks).

Weekly sessions will follow a standardized format:

  • 15 minutes- Social support group (guided discussion of experiences related to weekly topic)
  • 20 minutes- Didactic instruction
  • 15 minutes- Role playing
  • 10 minutes- Debriefing and group feedback

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Perceived Usability as Assessed by the System Usability Scale (SUS)
Time Frame: about 1 week after the end of the intervention
Scores on the System Usability Scale (SUS) range from 0-100, with higher scores indicating greater usability (which is the desired outcome).
about 1 week after the end of the intervention
Acceptability as Assessed by the Acceptability E-Scale
Time Frame: about 1 week after the end of the intervention
Scores on the Acceptability E-scale range from 6-30, with higher scores indicating greater acceptability (which is the desired outcome).
about 1 week after the end of the intervention
Feasibility as Assessed by Participation Rate
Time Frame: from the start of the intervention to the end of the intervention (6 weeks)
Scores on the LaTrobe Social Communication Questionnaire (LCQ) range from 30-120, with lower score indicating less social communication impairment (which is the desired outcome).
from the start of the intervention to the end of the intervention (6 weeks)
Feasibility as Assessed by Attrition Rate
Time Frame: from the start of the intervention to the end of the intervention (6 weeks)
from the start of the intervention to the end of the intervention (6 weeks)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in Social Communication as Assessed by the LaTrobe Communication Questionnaire (LCQ)
Time Frame: baseline, about 1 week after the end of the intervention
baseline, about 1 week after the end of the intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hilary N Touchett, PhD(c), The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 6, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 30, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

January 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 27, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 27, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

July 10, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 16, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 12, 2019

Last Verified

April 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Traumatic Brain Injury

Clinical Trials on Virtual Envrionment for Social Communication

Subscribe