- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03585543
Self-Management for Youth and Families Living With SCD - SMYLS
October 29, 2020 updated by: Medical University of South Carolina
Self-Management for Youth and Families Living With Sickle Cell Disease - SMYLS
The purpose of this proposal is to integrate family-centered self-management strategies with mobile health (mHealth) technology to improve reach, self-management behaviors, and child and caregiver physical and psychosocial symptoms and quality of life.
Specifically, the investigators propose to conduct feasibility testing of SMYLS, which has been adapted based on user feedback in the first phase of this study.
First the investigators will work with the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) Pediatric Sickle Cell Clinic to identify and recruit families with children with sickle cell disease (SCD) in the community, statewide.
Next, the investigators will test the feasibility of the intervention with 30 dyads of children ages 8 - 17 with sickle cell disease and their parent or primary caregiver, (N=60)
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
30
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
South Carolina
-
Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425
- Medical University of South Carolina
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
8 years to 17 years (Child)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- children ages 8 - 17 years and parent or primary caregiver 18 years or older
- child with sickle cell disease, as reported by clinician at MUSC Pediatric Sickle Cell Clinic
Exclusion Criteria:
- Parent/caregiver or child with cognitive disability or delay that precludes ability to participate
- Lack of wi-fi access
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Single group intervention arm
|
Intervention consists of a mHealth app delivered via smartphone
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Rates of Recruitment
Time Frame: Assessed each week over a period of 6 months, cumulative data up to 6 months is reported.
|
Number of weeks required to recruit 30 participants.
|
Assessed each week over a period of 6 months, cumulative data up to 6 months is reported.
|
|
Participant Adherence to Intervention
Time Frame: baseline to 6 weeks, 6 weeks to 12 weeks, 12 weeks to 6 months
|
Number of participants who used the intervention (mHealth application) from baseline to mid-intervention, from mid-intervention to end-of-intervention, and from end-of-intervention to follow-up, assessed by number of participants who logged into and used the app, stored in the app's back end database.
|
baseline to 6 weeks, 6 weeks to 12 weeks, 12 weeks to 6 months
|
|
Acceptability of Intervention
Time Frame: Assessed each week over a period of 6 months, cumulative data up to 6 months is reported.
|
Number of participants reporting problems with the intervention (mHealth app) per week.
|
Assessed each week over a period of 6 months, cumulative data up to 6 months is reported.
|
|
Participant Adherence to Intervention
Time Frame: baseline to 6 weeks, 6 weeks to 12 weeks, 12 weeks to 6 months
|
number of participants who accessed the educational component of intervention, assessed using back end app use database
|
baseline to 6 weeks, 6 weeks to 12 weeks, 12 weeks to 6 months
|
|
Participant Adherence to Intervention
Time Frame: baseline to 6 weeks, 6 weeks to 12 weeks, 12 weeks to 6 months
|
Number of participants who accessed the symptom monitoring component of the intervention, assessed using the app back end database
|
baseline to 6 weeks, 6 weeks to 12 weeks, 12 weeks to 6 months
|
|
Participant Adherence to Intervention
Time Frame: baseline to 6 weeks, 6 weeks to 12 weeks, 12 weeks to 6 months
|
number of participants who sent messages to nurse practitioner
|
baseline to 6 weeks, 6 weeks to 12 weeks, 12 weeks to 6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Difference in Mean Pain Score Rating From Baseline to End-of-intervention
Time Frame: baseline, 12 weeks
|
Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference Pediatric Short Form 8a: Change in score at 12 weeks minus baseline.
Raw scores range from 0 - 32, with 0 being the lowest pain rating and 32 the highest pain rating.
Any decrease in mean difference between scores = improved
|
baseline, 12 weeks
|
|
Difference in Mean Caregiver Self-efficacy Score From Baseline to End-of-intervention
Time Frame: baseline, 12 weeks
|
Self-efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease 6-item scale.
Scores for each item range from 1 - 10 with 1 indicating lower confidence/self-efficacy and 10 indicating higher confidence/self-efficacy.
Scores for each item are averaged for the mean total score.
Change in score at 12 weeks minus baseline.
Any increase in difference in mean scores = improved
|
baseline, 12 weeks
|
|
Differences in Mean Scores for Quality of Life From Baseline to End-of-intervention
Time Frame: baseline, 12 weeks
|
Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (Peds QL): Scores are transformed on a scale from 0 - 100, with 0 indicating the highest possible problems with quality of life and 100 indicating the lowest possible problems with quality of life.
Change in score at 12 weeks minus baseline.
Any increase in difference between mean scores = improved
|
baseline, 12 weeks
|
|
Difference in Mean Scores for Fatigue From Baseline to End-of-intervention
Time Frame: baseline, 12 weeks
|
Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Pediatric Short Form 10a: Raw Scores range from 0 - 40 with 0 being the least amount of fatigue and 40 the most fatigue.
Difference in mean scores at 12 weeks minus baseline.
Any decrease in rating = improved
|
baseline, 12 weeks
|
|
Difference in Mean Scores for Anxiety From Baseline to End-of-intervention
Time Frame: baseline, 12 weeks
|
Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement System (PROMIS) Pediatric Short Form Anxiety 8a: Raw Scores range from 0 - 32, with 0 being the lowest anxiety rating and 32 the highest anxiety rating.
Change in score at 12 weeks minus baseline.
Any decrease difference in mean scores = improved
|
baseline, 12 weeks
|
|
Differences in Mean Scores on Depressive Symptoms From Baseline to End-of-intervention
Time Frame: baseline,12 weeks
|
Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement System (PROMIS) Pediatric short form depression 8a: Raw Scores range from 0 - 32, with 0 being the lowest depression rating and 32 the highest depression rating.
Change in score at 12 weeks minus baseline.
Any decrease in differences in mean scores = improved
|
baseline,12 weeks
|
|
Differences in Mean Scores for Pain Intensity From Baseline to End-of-intervention
Time Frame: baseline, 12 weeks
|
Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Intensity Pediatric 3a.
Raw scores range from 3 - 15, with 3 being the lowest pain intensity rating and 15 being the highest pain intensity rating.
Change in score at 12 weeks minus baseline.
Any decrease in mean difference between scores = improved
|
baseline, 12 weeks
|
|
Differences in Mean Scores for Disease-related Quality of Life From Baseline to End-of-intervention
Time Frame: baseline, 12 weeks
|
Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (Peds QL) with SCD module: Scores are transformed on a scale from 0 - 100, with 0 indicating the highest possible problems with quality of life and 100 indicating the lowest possible problems with quality of life.
Change in score at 12 weeks minus baseline.
Any increase in difference between mean scores = improved
|
baseline, 12 weeks
|
|
Clinic Appointment Attendance
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
Number of missed clinic appointments at baseline compared to 12 weeks
|
12 weeks
|
|
Home Medication Administration
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
Adherence to home medications, measured by number of medications marked as taken in the app database.
|
12 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
March 16, 2018
Primary Completion (Actual)
January 31, 2019
Study Completion (Actual)
January 31, 2019
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
May 4, 2018
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 11, 2018
First Posted (Actual)
July 13, 2018
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
November 19, 2020
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 29, 2020
Last Verified
October 1, 2020
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Pro00062837
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Sickle Cell Disease
-
Connecticut Children's Medical CenterChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute... and other collaboratorsNot yet recruitingSickle Cell Disease | Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) | Sickle Cell Anemia in Children | Sickle Cell | Sickle Cell Anemia (HbSS)United States
-
Klein Buendel, Inc.National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD); Hilton...CompletedSickle Cell Disease | Sickle Cell Anemia in Children | Sickle Cell Thalassemia | Sickle Cell SC DiseaseUnited States
-
Nova Laboratories LimitedCompletedSickle Cell Disease | Sickle Cell Hemoglobin C | Sickle Cell-beta-thalassemia | Sickle-Cell; Hemoglobin Disease, ThalassemiaUnited Kingdom, Jamaica
-
SangartWithdrawnSickle Cell Disease | Anemia, Sickle Cell | Sickle Cell Anemia | Hemoglobin SC Disease | Sickle Cell Disorders | Sickle Cell Hemoglobin C DiseaseFrance, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Turkey, Bahrain, Belgium, Brazil, Lebanon, Qatar
-
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam...CompletedSickle Cell Disease | Sickle Cell SC Disease | Sickle Cell-SS Disease | Sickle Cell RetinopathyNetherlands
-
University of British ColumbiaCompletedSickle Cell Disease | Beta-Thalassemia | Sickle Cell Trait | Sickle Cell-Beta Thalassemia | Sickle Cell-SS DiseaseCanada, Nepal
-
Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson...National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)TerminatedSickle Cell Anemia | Sickle Cell-hemoglobin C Disease | Sickle Cell-β0-thalassemiaUnited States
-
SangartCompletedSickle Cell Disease | Anemia, Sickle Cell | Sickle Cell Anemia | Hemoglobin SC Disease | Sickle Cell Disorders | Sickle Cell Hemoglobin C DiseaseUnited Kingdom, France, Jamaica, Lebanon
-
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)RecruitingObservational Study to Deeply Phenotype Major Organs in Sickle Cell Disease After Curative TherapiesMortality in Sickle Cell | Sickle Cell Cardiopulmonary Complications | Sickle Cell Organ Damage | Sickle Cell Life Expectancy and Risk Factors for Early Death | Sickle Cell Lung Disease and Sudden DeathUnited States
-
University of RegensburgRecruitingSickle Cell Disease | Sickle Cell Anemia | Sickle Cell Disorders | HbS Disease | Hemoglobin S Disease | Sickling Disorder Due to Hemoglobin SGermany, Austria
Clinical Trials on Voice Crisis Alert V2
-
Medical University of South CarolinaCompletedSickle Cell DiseaseUnited States
-
Medical University of South CarolinaNational Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)Recruiting