Self-Management for Youth and Families Living With SCD - SMYLS

October 29, 2020 updated by: Medical University of South Carolina

Self-Management for Youth and Families Living With Sickle Cell Disease - SMYLS

The purpose of this proposal is to integrate family-centered self-management strategies with mobile health (mHealth) technology to improve reach, self-management behaviors, and child and caregiver physical and psychosocial symptoms and quality of life. Specifically, the investigators propose to conduct feasibility testing of SMYLS, which has been adapted based on user feedback in the first phase of this study. First the investigators will work with the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) Pediatric Sickle Cell Clinic to identify and recruit families with children with sickle cell disease (SCD) in the community, statewide. Next, the investigators will test the feasibility of the intervention with 30 dyads of children ages 8 - 17 with sickle cell disease and their parent or primary caregiver, (N=60)

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425
        • Medical University of South Carolina

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

8 years to 17 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • children ages 8 - 17 years and parent or primary caregiver 18 years or older
  • child with sickle cell disease, as reported by clinician at MUSC Pediatric Sickle Cell Clinic

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Parent/caregiver or child with cognitive disability or delay that precludes ability to participate
  • Lack of wi-fi access

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Single group intervention arm
Intervention consists of a mHealth app delivered via smartphone

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rates of Recruitment
Time Frame: Assessed each week over a period of 6 months, cumulative data up to 6 months is reported.
Number of weeks required to recruit 30 participants.
Assessed each week over a period of 6 months, cumulative data up to 6 months is reported.
Participant Adherence to Intervention
Time Frame: baseline to 6 weeks, 6 weeks to 12 weeks, 12 weeks to 6 months
Number of participants who used the intervention (mHealth application) from baseline to mid-intervention, from mid-intervention to end-of-intervention, and from end-of-intervention to follow-up, assessed by number of participants who logged into and used the app, stored in the app's back end database.
baseline to 6 weeks, 6 weeks to 12 weeks, 12 weeks to 6 months
Acceptability of Intervention
Time Frame: Assessed each week over a period of 6 months, cumulative data up to 6 months is reported.
Number of participants reporting problems with the intervention (mHealth app) per week.
Assessed each week over a period of 6 months, cumulative data up to 6 months is reported.
Participant Adherence to Intervention
Time Frame: baseline to 6 weeks, 6 weeks to 12 weeks, 12 weeks to 6 months
number of participants who accessed the educational component of intervention, assessed using back end app use database
baseline to 6 weeks, 6 weeks to 12 weeks, 12 weeks to 6 months
Participant Adherence to Intervention
Time Frame: baseline to 6 weeks, 6 weeks to 12 weeks, 12 weeks to 6 months
Number of participants who accessed the symptom monitoring component of the intervention, assessed using the app back end database
baseline to 6 weeks, 6 weeks to 12 weeks, 12 weeks to 6 months
Participant Adherence to Intervention
Time Frame: baseline to 6 weeks, 6 weeks to 12 weeks, 12 weeks to 6 months
number of participants who sent messages to nurse practitioner
baseline to 6 weeks, 6 weeks to 12 weeks, 12 weeks to 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in Mean Pain Score Rating From Baseline to End-of-intervention
Time Frame: baseline, 12 weeks
Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference Pediatric Short Form 8a: Change in score at 12 weeks minus baseline. Raw scores range from 0 - 32, with 0 being the lowest pain rating and 32 the highest pain rating. Any decrease in mean difference between scores = improved
baseline, 12 weeks
Difference in Mean Caregiver Self-efficacy Score From Baseline to End-of-intervention
Time Frame: baseline, 12 weeks
Self-efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease 6-item scale. Scores for each item range from 1 - 10 with 1 indicating lower confidence/self-efficacy and 10 indicating higher confidence/self-efficacy. Scores for each item are averaged for the mean total score. Change in score at 12 weeks minus baseline. Any increase in difference in mean scores = improved
baseline, 12 weeks
Differences in Mean Scores for Quality of Life From Baseline to End-of-intervention
Time Frame: baseline, 12 weeks
Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (Peds QL): Scores are transformed on a scale from 0 - 100, with 0 indicating the highest possible problems with quality of life and 100 indicating the lowest possible problems with quality of life. Change in score at 12 weeks minus baseline. Any increase in difference between mean scores = improved
baseline, 12 weeks
Difference in Mean Scores for Fatigue From Baseline to End-of-intervention
Time Frame: baseline, 12 weeks
Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Pediatric Short Form 10a: Raw Scores range from 0 - 40 with 0 being the least amount of fatigue and 40 the most fatigue. Difference in mean scores at 12 weeks minus baseline. Any decrease in rating = improved
baseline, 12 weeks
Difference in Mean Scores for Anxiety From Baseline to End-of-intervention
Time Frame: baseline, 12 weeks
Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement System (PROMIS) Pediatric Short Form Anxiety 8a: Raw Scores range from 0 - 32, with 0 being the lowest anxiety rating and 32 the highest anxiety rating. Change in score at 12 weeks minus baseline. Any decrease difference in mean scores = improved
baseline, 12 weeks
Differences in Mean Scores on Depressive Symptoms From Baseline to End-of-intervention
Time Frame: baseline,12 weeks
Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement System (PROMIS) Pediatric short form depression 8a: Raw Scores range from 0 - 32, with 0 being the lowest depression rating and 32 the highest depression rating. Change in score at 12 weeks minus baseline. Any decrease in differences in mean scores = improved
baseline,12 weeks
Differences in Mean Scores for Pain Intensity From Baseline to End-of-intervention
Time Frame: baseline, 12 weeks
Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Intensity Pediatric 3a. Raw scores range from 3 - 15, with 3 being the lowest pain intensity rating and 15 being the highest pain intensity rating. Change in score at 12 weeks minus baseline. Any decrease in mean difference between scores = improved
baseline, 12 weeks
Differences in Mean Scores for Disease-related Quality of Life From Baseline to End-of-intervention
Time Frame: baseline, 12 weeks
Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (Peds QL) with SCD module: Scores are transformed on a scale from 0 - 100, with 0 indicating the highest possible problems with quality of life and 100 indicating the lowest possible problems with quality of life. Change in score at 12 weeks minus baseline. Any increase in difference between mean scores = improved
baseline, 12 weeks
Clinic Appointment Attendance
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Number of missed clinic appointments at baseline compared to 12 weeks
12 weeks
Home Medication Administration
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Adherence to home medications, measured by number of medications marked as taken in the app database.
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 16, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 4, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 11, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

July 13, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 19, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 29, 2020

Last Verified

October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sickle Cell Disease

Clinical Trials on Voice Crisis Alert V2

Subscribe