COaching and Prehabilitation: Faisability Study in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome (COHABILIT)

December 13, 2024 updated by: Institut Paoli-Calmettes

Feasibility Study of Tripartite Prehabilitation of Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukaemia and High-risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes During Intensive Chemotherapy Before Allogenic Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: the COHABILIT Protocol

This faisability study aims to evaluate the adhesion of the patient to a multidisciplinary program (adapted physical activity, coaching and nutrition)

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Marseille, France, 13009
        • Institut Paoli Calmettes

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome
  • Age between 18 and 70 years
  • Eligible for an intensive chemotherapy
  • Eligible for allograft
  • Able to answer a questionnaire

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of acute promyelocytic Leukemia
  • Palliative treatment
  • Contraindication to moderate physical activity
  • Performans status 4, unless it is related to the disease
  • Patient who does not understand French
  • Patient unable to use a smartphone
  • Patient deprived of liberty or placed under the authority of a tutor,
  • Patient considered socially or psychologically unable to comply with the treatment and the required medical follow-up.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Prehabilitation program
Program based on nutritional support, physical activity program and coaching. Home-based monitoring will be done thanks to connected watches (step counter pedometer) and a connected body fat weight scale
nutritional support, adapted physical activity and coaching

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
feasibility to the adapted multidisciplinary program
Time Frame: 6 months
proportion of patients who will complete more than 50% of the APA/coaching sessions prescribed
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluate change in functional capacity
Time Frame: 6 months
Test SPPB
6 months
Evaluate changes in upper limb strengt
Time Frame: 6 months
Prehension strength with handgrip
6 months
Evaluate changes in lower limb strength
Time Frame: 6 months
Quadriceps strength with dynamometer
6 months
Evaluate physical activity sessions modalities
Time Frame: 6 months
Data from connected watch
6 months
Evaluate physical activity sessions feasability
Time Frame: 6 months
Number of sessions not undertaken and reason for refusal
6 months
Evaluate positive and negative affect
Time Frame: 6 months
Outcomes of questionaries : PANAS,
6 months
Evaluate life satisfaction
Time Frame: 6 months
Outcomes of questionaries LSS
6 months
Evaluate the level of depression
Time Frame: 6 months
Outcomes of questionaries HADS
6 months
Evaluate the quality of the trainer-trainee relationship
Time Frame: 6 months
Outcomes of questionaries CART-Q
6 months
Evaluate self-efficacy
Time Frame: 6 months
Outcomes of questionaries Self-efficacy
6 months
Evaluate relationship dynamics
Time Frame: 6 months
Semi-directive interviews
6 months
Evaluate QoL
Time Frame: 6 months
Outcomes of questionaries FACT-Leu
6 months
Evaluate the cancer related fatigue
Time Frame: 6 months
Outcomes of questionaries FACT-Fa
6 months
Evaluate correlation between APA coaching sessions undertaken and NRM
Time Frame: 6 months
Correlation between number of APA sessions and NRM
6 months
Evaluate correlation between APA coaching sessions undertaken and survival
Time Frame: 6 months
Correlation between number of APA sessions and survival rates
6 months
Evaluate correlation between APA coaching sessions undertaken and QoL
Time Frame: 6 months
Correlation between number of APA sessions and Fact-Leu
6 months
Evaluate correlation between APA coaching sessions undertaken and fatigue
Time Frame: 6 months
Correlation between number of APA sessions and Fact-Fa
6 months
Evaluate changes in weight
Time Frame: 6 months
Change in weight (impedancemetry data via connected weighing machine)
6 months
Evaluate body mass index
Time Frame: 6 months
Change in body mass index (BMI= Weight/Height²)
6 months
changes in impedancemetry data
Time Frame: 6 months
Impedaneimetry mesures (connected weighing machine): body mass index variations,
6 months
Evaluate muscle mass
Time Frame: 6 months
Change in muscle mass (impedancemetry data via connected weighing machine)
6 months
Evaluate fat mass
Time Frame: 6 months
Abdominal scan by L3 cross-section: Skeletal Muscle Mass Index (SMI= skeletal muscle mass/height)
6 months
Evaluate skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) change in the course of the treatment
Time Frame: 6 months
Abdominal scan by L3 cross-section: Skeletal Muscle Mass Index (SMI= skeletal muscle mass/height)
6 months
Evaluate adherence to nutrition programme
Time Frame: 6 months
Number of days enteral and parenteral nutrition
6 months
Study correlation between variation in weight, BMI, muscle mass, fat mass and SMI on physical capacities, QoL, number of infections, number of days of hospitalisation, patients' outcomes (NRM, survival) and GvHD in allotransplant patients.
Time Frame: 6 months
Correlation between variation in weight, BMI, muscle mass, fat mass and SMI with NRM, overall survival, number of days of hospitalisation, number of infections documented, QoL, physical capacities and GvHD
6 months
Complete remision
Time Frame: 6 months
Complete remision rate
6 months
- Evaluate number of infections documented
Time Frame: 6 months
number of infections documented
6 months
evaluate number of days of hospitalisation
Time Frame: 6 months
number of days of hospitalisation mesured in nights
6 months
evaluate rate of early mortality
Time Frame: 30 days
rate of premature mortality
30 days
evaluate rate of overall mortality
Time Frame: 30 days
rate of overall mortality
30 days
evaluate cause of overall mortality
Time Frame: 6 months
cause of premature mortality
6 months
Evaluate rate of non relapse Mortality (RNM)
Time Frame: 6 months
Rate of NRM
6 months
evaluate overall survival
Time Frame: 6 months
overal survival rate
6 months
evaluate survival without relapse
Time Frame: 6 monts
survival without relapse rate
6 monts
evaluate survival without events
Time Frame: 6 monts
survival without events rate
6 monts
evaluate number of allotransplant patients
Time Frame: 6 monts
number of allotransplant patients
6 monts
evalaute number of patients disqualified for allotransplant
Time Frame: 6 monts
number of patients with transplant indication disqualified for allotransplant
6 monts
degree of digestive GVH disease
Time Frame: 6 monts
GVH disease grade
6 monts
Evaluation of the severity of digestive GVH disease
Time Frame: 6 monts
severity of GVH desease
6 monts

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Cécile Bannier Braticevic, MD, Institut Paoli-Calmettes

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 4, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 4, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 4, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 11, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 11, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

July 23, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 13, 2024

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Clinical Trials on Coaching and Habilitation

Subscribe