Headless Screws x Bouquet in Boxer's Fracture

July 29, 2019 updated by: Marcio Aurelio Aita, Faculdade de Medicina do ABC

Headless Screws Versus Bouquet in Intramedullar Fixation of Boxer's Fracture: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Despite the high prevalence (20% of the hand fractures) of unstable neck metacarpals fractures (boxer's fractures) there is still no consensus concerning the preferred method and ideal moment of treatment, especially in active patients where the time or type of management can have a strong psychological impact on the outcomes.

The use of intramedullar technique (headless intramedular screws or bouquet technique fixation) as definitive treatment of unstable boxer's fractures in active patients at the first week, may be a good choice of treatment. This technique is fast, safe, minimally invasive and easily performed reproducible method, without address the extensor tendon to prevent tendon adhesion and joint stiffness, unable earlier functional recovery and shorten the working return time of these patients. Choose a reproducible and effective method, which presents a cost / benefit compatible with our reality.

The goal of the present study is to compare working return time, VAS (visual analogue score), quick DASH (disability arm, shoulder and hand) and radiographic outcomes of two methods of definitive internal fixation in active patients in boxer's fractures, operated in the first week.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

A double center, parallel group, prospective, randomized clinical trial was conducted at the department of Hand Surgery, ABC University hospital, Santo Andre, Brazil and Hospital Mãe de Deus, Porto Alegre, Brazil. Two implants used for fixation in closed reduction of boxer's fractures were compared: the headless cannulated screws (Synthes®, Davos) and the Bouquet technique with k-wires (Synthes®, Davos). The protocol was approved by the local research ethics committee. All patients received, signed and are aware of what was recommended in the Informed Consent (IC). Inclusion criteria were; presence of an acute (0 to 7 days), closed and simple fracture of the metacarpal neck, absence of an ipsilateral injury or deformity, Start January 2017.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

24

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Brazil
    • Sao Paulo
      • São Bernardo Do Campo, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 09732480
        • Recruiting
        • Marcio Aurelio Aita
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Marcio Aurelio Aita

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • presence of an acute (0 to 7 days), closed and simple fracture of the metacarpal neck, absence of an ipsilateral injury or deformity, presence of an angulation of over 40 degrees in oblique plane imaging, being 18 years of age or older, having acquired a master's degree or still being a student, and being an employee in a social-professional environment with mild physical activities.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • elderly, children, mental ness

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: control group
bouquet technique
Device: headless screw
headless screw group
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: test group
headless screw
Device: headless screw
headless screw group

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
patient outcome reported
Time Frame: 6 months
QuickDASH
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Faculdade de Medicina do ABC

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marcio Aurelio a Aita, FMABC

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

February 1, 2019

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

June 5, 2019

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 10, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 30, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 30, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

July 31, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

July 30, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 29, 2019

Last Verified

July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 311718

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe