SIMPLE Chemotherapy for NK Lymphoma/Leukaemia

August 13, 2018 updated by: Professor Yok-lam Kwong, The University of Hong Kong

Combination Chemotherapy Using Cisplatin, Gemcitabine, Ifosfamide, Etoposide, L-asparaginase and Dexamethasone (SIMPLE) for Newly Diagnosed and Relapsed/Refractory NK/T Cell Malignancies

NK malignancies consist of two different clinical entities, extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma and aggressive NK leukaemia. Queen Mary Hospital (QMH) had started to use PIGLETS chemotherapy for treatment of NK malignancies since 2013, with promising results. The study in QMH had ended because of successful recruitment in the planned number of subjects.

When PIGLETS was used in extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma, patients with stage I/II lymphoma have an overall response rate of nearly 90%, while patients with stage III/IV disease have an overall response rate of around 60%. The figures are comparable to the SMILE chemotherapy previously used. However, PIGLETS regimen carries much lower risk of nephrotoxicity when compared with SMILE. It has since become a standard protocol in management of NK malignancies in our institution.

PIGLETS chemotherapy carries two major problems:

  1. the name PIGLETS may appear offensive to some religious populations. (e.g. Muslim)
  2. significant nausea/vomiting was seen in previous studies, and these could at least be partially alleviated with substance P antagonist aprepitant

Thus the investigators decided to start a study, renaming the original PIGLETS regimen into SIMPLE chemotherapy, adding aprepitant as antiemetics and to recruit more patients for evaluation of clinical efficacy. The results of SIMPLE chemotherapy will be compared to SMILE in a non-inferiority trial setting.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Natural killer (NK)/T-cell malignancies comprise two related entities, extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma and aggressive NK leukaemia. The disease occurs world-wide but Asian and South American populations are particularly affected, NK/T cell malignancies carry poor prognosis, the response rate is low with conventional CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone) or CHOP-like regimen even for newly diagnosed disease. These regimens are typically ineffective for relapsed disease.

In the last 10 years the investigators have employed two different regimen sequentially. The former SMILE regimen (Dexamethasone, methotrexate, ifosfamide, L-asparaginase and etoposide) harness the combination of P-gp independent chemotherapy in management of NK/T cell malignancies with great success. However, nephrotoxicity remained a major concern with the use of this regimen. The SMILE regimen was later modified as PIGLETS regimen (cisplatin, ifosfamide, gemcitabine, L-asparaginase, etoposide, dexamethasone) to reduce the risk of nephrotoxicity while preserving the treatment efficacy. The study with the use of PIGLETS was approved by IRB. The preliminary results of phase II clinical trial with PIGLETS at Queen Mary Hospital resulted in an overall response rate (ORR) of 80% in newly diagnosed disease.

The recruitment was completed with previous PIGLETS phase II trial. The problems with the PIGLETS regimen are:

  1. The term 'PIGLETS' may appear to be offensive in some of the ethnicities/religions.
  2. Significant nausea and vomiting, which may be delayed after completion of chemotherapy.

In addition, there is a need of further subject recruitment for comparison with SMILE therapy for non-inferiority. In the current study, the regimen was renamed as 'SIMPLE' and aprepitant (a substance P antagonist) was added in the regimen to reduce the incidence of nausea and vomiting. The current study aims to compare SIMPLE to SMILE in a 'non-inferiority' design.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

68

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • Recruiting
        • The University of Hong Kong

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adult patients age 18-80 with biopsy proven extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma, nasal type or aggressive NK leukaemia
  2. ECOG performance score <=2

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Poor performance status with ECOG >=3
  2. Impairment of renal function (serum creatinine more than or equal to 200umol/L) not otherwise attributed to the tumour involvement.
  3. Impairment of liver function with liver parenchymal enzymes 5 times the upper limit of normal range, not otherwise attributed to tumour involvement.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: SIMPLE
cisplatin, gemcitabine, ifosfamide, etoposide (VP-16), L-asparaginase, dexamethasone
SIMPLE
SIMPLE
SIMPLE
SIMPLE
SIMPLE
SIMPLE

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficacy as measured by overall response rate measured at the time of best response.
Time Frame: 2 years
Overall response rate (ORR) is defined as the proportion of patients with reduction in tumor burden of at least 50%.
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse events and severe adverse events related to the treatment
Time Frame: 1 year
Incidence of AE and SAE by severity grading as assessed according to CTCAE v4.03
1 year
Progression-free survival (PFS)
Time Frame: 2 years
PFS is defined as the time from enrolment to progression or death due to any cause. The distribution of PFS will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier.
2 years
Overall survival (OS)
Time Frame: 2 years
OS is defined as the time from registration to death due to any cause. The distribution of survival time will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier.
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

July 1, 2017

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

March 14, 2020

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

June 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 25, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 7, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

August 9, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

August 14, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 13, 2018

Last Verified

August 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Natural Killer/T-Cell Lymphoma, Nasal and Nasal-Type

Clinical Trials on Cisplatin

Subscribe