A Post-Market Study of BandGrip in Traumatic Wound Closure Compared to Suture

July 8, 2019 updated by: BandGrip
an unbalanced (2:1) randomized study comparing two methods of traumatic skin closure in an ER setting: BandGrip vs suture

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Up to 45 subjects at up to 2 study sites who present to the ER for treatment of a skin laceration will be consented and randomized to treatment with suture or BandGrip. Subjects will be followed for 30 days post treatment to assess cosmetic quality of wound healing, evidence of adverse events related to closure method, and speed and completeness of wound closure and removal of closure devices.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

45

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Irvine, California, United States, 92868
        • Recruiting
        • University of Irvine
        • Contact:
          • John Fox, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male/Female age 18-65.
  • Subject presents to emergency room with at least one skin laceration that is assessed as requiring a suture closure on the trunk or extremities (excluding hands and feet).
  • The length of the laceration is less than or equal to 1.5 inches.
  • Subject is otherwise in good general health in the opinion of the investigator.
  • Subject must be willing to follow instructions for wound care provided by investigator and refrain from picking at the treatment device, applying topical medications to the wound, and swimming or soaking in a tub until BandGrip or the sutures are removed.
  • Subject agrees to return for follow-up evaluations.
  • Subject (or guardian) is able to comprehend and give informed consent for participation in this study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Significant multiple trauma (merely multiple wounds are allowed).
  • The wound involves a lower limb with critical limb ischemia.
  • Concurrent acute infection requiring intravenous or oral antibiotics.
  • Bleeding, coagulation and or clotting disorders.
  • Subject is on dialysis.
  • Inflammatory and or allergic diseases or conditions of the skin: for example, psoriasis, eczema or dermatitis.
  • History of drug abuse.
  • Chronic use of oral steroids or immunosuppressants.
  • Known personal or family history of keloid or hypertrophic scarring.
  • History of abnormal wound healing.
  • Burst stellate lacerations due to a crush or hard blow.
  • Animal or human bite or scratch.
  • Wound is in the head, hands or feet or in a high skin tension area or across an area of increased skin tension on a joint.
  • Investigator objects to a patient's involvement in the study protocol.
  • Known allergy to components to BandGrip or suture material.
  • Known cognitive or psychiatric disorder.
  • Wound requiring debridement of devitalized or contaminated tissue.
  • Wound at site of active rash/skin lesion making evaluation difficult.
  • Previously treated wound or has failed to heal.
  • Puncture wound.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: BandGrip
Topical skin closure device
Topical skin closure device
Active Comparator: Standard Suture
Standard sutures will be used for wound closure
Wound closure

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Complete wound closure
Time Frame: 30 days post treatment
defined as continuous approximation of skin margins without need for reintervention .
30 days post treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Wound comesis
Time Frame: 10 and 30 days post closure
a 100mm visual analog scale (with 100 representing complete satisfaction with comesis) assessing wound cosmesis using the Comesis Visual Analog Scale.
10 and 30 days post closure
Pain/discomfort
Time Frame: index procedure and 10 days post closure
The subject will complete a 100mm visual analog scale with 100 representing worst pain level.
index procedure and 10 days post closure
Infection
Time Frame: 10 and 30 days post closure
incidence of clinical infection requiring antibiotic treatment.
10 and 30 days post closure
Subject satisfaction
Time Frame: 30 days post closure
subjects will complete a 100mm VAS (with 100 representing complete satisfaction) to evaluate their overall assessment of their scar,
30 days post closure
Physician satisfaction
Time Frame: index procedure
a 100mm VAS ( with 100mm representing complete satisfaction) to evaluate the overall ease of wound closure.
index procedure
Time to wound closure and device removal
Time Frame: index procedure and 10 days post wound closure
Time to closure and removal of closure device
index procedure and 10 days post wound closure
Subject Satisfaction
Time Frame: 30 days post closure
indication of subject preference for method of sound closure
30 days post closure
Wound Evaluation
Time Frame: 10 and 30 days post wound closure
assessment of the quality of wound healing by the physician.
10 and 30 days post wound closure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Dennis Donohoe, BandGrip

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 15, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 18, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 9, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

August 14, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 10, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 8, 2019

Last Verified

July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Protocol: ERM-001, Version 01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Laceration of Skin

Clinical Trials on BandGrip

Subscribe