- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03642938
Exercise Dosing for Pain in Healthy Participants
July 18, 2023 updated by: Benedict Kolber, Duquesne University
The Dosing of Aerobic Exercise Therapy on Experimentally-induced Pain in Healthy Female Participants.
In this study investigators will examine the effect of dose related to exercise therapy for pain in healthy adult humans.
An acute pain model will be employed to study the effect of exercise dose on pain.
Acute pain models are currently used to study pain (both acute and chronic) in human samples as there is currently no chronic pain model.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This study is designed as a randomized controlled trial with repeated measures.
The effect of exercise dose on pain: subjects will be randomly assigned to one of four exercise groups: 1.) no exercise (control); 2.) low dose exercise (3x/week); 3.) moderate dose exercise (5x/week).
4.) high dose exercise (10x/week).
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
41
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15282
- Duquesne University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 40 years (Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Between age 18-40
- Normal BMI (18.5-25.0)
- Heart Rate (HR) 60-100 bmp
- BP less than or equal to 140/90
Exclusion Criteria:
- Age <18 or >40 years
- Cardiac, respiratory, neurological or musculoskeletal disease
- Acute pain
- Chronic pain condition
- Diabetes
- BMI ≥ 25.1 or ≤ 18.4
- Regular participation in high intensity athletic/sporting activities
- Sedentary
- Anxiety or depression disorders
- Tape allergy
- Currently pregnant
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Low Dose Exercise
The Low Dose Exercise group will perform treadmill walking exercise, three times per week for one week.
|
Exercise groups will perform moderate intensity treadmill walking at a speed of 3.5 mph at a 0% incline for 30 minutes.
|
|
Experimental: Moderate Dose Exercise
The Moderate Dose Exercise group will perform treadmill walking exercise, five times per week for one week.
|
Exercise groups will perform moderate intensity treadmill walking at a speed of 3.5 mph at a 0% incline for 30 minutes.
|
|
Experimental: High Dose Exercise
The High Dose Exercise group will perform treadmill walking exercise, ten times per week for one week.
|
Exercise groups will perform moderate intensity treadmill walking at a speed of 3.5 mph at a 0% incline for 30 minutes.
|
|
Sham Comparator: Control
The Control group will perform quiet rest, three times per week for one week.
|
The Control group will perform 30 minutes of quiet rest.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Intervention Effects on Mechanical Sensitivity Threshold
Time Frame: baseline and 24 hrs-post final intervention session
|
Subjects' cutaneous mechanical sensitivity threshold will be examined using standard monofilaments that apply a force of 0.008g, 0.02g, 0.04g, 0.07g, 0.16g, 0.4g, 0.6g and 1.0g to the forearm and calf.
Percent Baseline to 24 hrs post-intervention will then be calculated (100*Value at 24 hours/Value at Baseline).
A filament of different weight is applied to the skin to look at the threshold of response.
|
baseline and 24 hrs-post final intervention session
|
|
Intervention Effects on Constant Heat Pain Intensity
Time Frame: baseline and 24 hrs-post final intervention session
|
Subjects' constant heat pain intensity rating will be assessed using a (45 degree Celsius, 3cm x 5cm heating block applied to the forearm and calf for 3 seconds).
Following the stimulus, subjects will rate the intensity of the pain associated with the stimulus using a visual analog scale numbered at 0 and 10, where "0" represents "no pain" and "10" represents "the worst pain imaginable" (0=minimum score, 10 maximum score).
Percent baseline to 24 hrs post-intervention will then be calculated (100*Value at 24 hours/Value at Baseline).
|
baseline and 24 hrs-post final intervention session
|
|
Intervention Effects on Constant Heat Pain Unpleasantness
Time Frame: baseline and 24 hrs-post final intervention session
|
Subjects' constant heat pain unpleasantness rating will be assessed using a (45 degree Celsius, 3cm x 5cm heating block applied to the forearm and calf for 3 seconds).
Following the stimulus, subjects will rate the unpleasantness of the pain associated with the stimulus using a visual analog scale numbered at 0 and 10, where "0" represents "not unpleasant" and "10" represents "the most unpleasant sensation imaginable" (0=minimum score, 10 maximum score).
Percent baseline to 24 hrs post-intervention will then be calculated (100*Value at 24 hours/Value at Baseline).
|
baseline and 24 hrs-post final intervention session
|
|
Intervention Effects on Radiant Heat Sensitivity
Time Frame: baseline and 24 hrs-post final intervention session
|
Subjects' radiant heat sensitivity will be assessed using a temperature ramp from 30 degrees Celsius to 50 degrees Celsius over 60 seconds with participant defined cutoff in temperature (degrees Celsius) reading at their "sensitivity threshold" to the thermal stimulus (IITC Thermal Stimulus Apparatus with custom heated glass).
This will be assessed on the forearm and calf.
Percent baseline to 24 hrs post-intervention will then be calculated (100*Value at 24 hours/Value at Baseline).
|
baseline and 24 hrs-post final intervention session
|
|
Intervention Effects on Radiant Heat Pain
Time Frame: baseline and 24 hrs-post final intervention session
|
Subjects' radiant heat pain threshold will be assessed using a temperature ramp from 30 degrees Celsius to 50 degrees Celsius over 20 seconds with participant defined cutoff in temperature (degrees Celsius) reading at their "pain threshold" to the thermal stimulus (IITC Thermal Stimulus Apparatus with custom heated glass).
This will be assessed on the forearm and calf.
Percent baseline to 24 hrs post-intervention will then be calculated (100*Value at 24 hours/Value at Baseline).
|
baseline and 24 hrs-post final intervention session
|
|
Intervention Effects on Pressure Pain Threshold
Time Frame: baseline and 24 hrs-post final intervention session
|
Subjects' pressure pain threshold will be assessed using a pressure algometer (Wagner Instruments; 1cm round probe applied at constant ramping pressure until participant defined cutoff in kg at "pain threshold").
This will be assessed on the forearm and calf.
Percent baseline to 24 hrs post-intervention will then be calculated (100*Value at 24 hours/Value at Baseline).
|
baseline and 24 hrs-post final intervention session
|
|
Intervention Effects on Constant Pressure Pain Intensity
Time Frame: baseline and 24 hrs-post final intervention session
|
Subjects' constant pressure pain intensity rating will be assessed using a pressure algometer (Wagner Instruments; 1cm round probe applied for 2 seconds at participant defined threshold).
Following the stimulus, subjects will rate the intensity of the pain associated with the stimulus using a visual analog scale numbered at 0 and 10, where "0" represents "no pain" and "10" represents "the worst pain imaginable" (0=minimum score, 10 maximum score).
This will be assessed on the forearm and calf.
Percent baseline to 24 hrs post-intervention will then be calculated (100*Value at 24 hours/Value at Baseline).
|
baseline and 24 hrs-post final intervention session
|
|
Intervention Effects on Constant Pressure Pain Unpleasantness
Time Frame: baseline and 24 hrs-post final intervention session
|
Subjects' constant pressure pain unpleasantness rating will be assessed using a pressure algometer (Wagner Instruments; 1cm round probe applied for 2 seconds at participant defined threshold).
Following the stimulus, subjects will rate the unpleasantness of the pain associated with the stimulus using a visual analog scale numbered at 0 and 10, where "0" represents "not unpleasant" and "10" represents "the most unpleasant sensation imaginable" (0=minimum score, 10 maximum score).This will be assessed on the forearm and calf.
Percent change from baseline to 24 hrs post-intervention will then be calculated (100*Value at 24 hours/Value at Baseline).
|
baseline and 24 hrs-post final intervention session
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Heart Rate
Time Frame: days 1, 3, & 5 at start and end of each exercise session
|
Heart rate will be measured before and after each exercise session.
Percent pre-exercise session in heart rate (bpm) from start to end of exercise session will be calculated (100*Value at end trial/Value at start of trial).
|
days 1, 3, & 5 at start and end of each exercise session
|
|
Borg Rate of Perceived Exertion (RPE)
Time Frame: days 1, 3, & 5 at start and end of each exercise session
|
Subjects will indicate rate of perceived exertion before and after each exercise session.
Percent of pre-exercise RPE from start to end of exercise session will be calculated (100* end of trial / start of trial).
|
days 1, 3, & 5 at start and end of each exercise session
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Kimberly A Szucs, PhD, Duquesne University
- Principal Investigator: Amy L Phelps, PhD, Duquesne University
- Principal Investigator: Matthew C Kostek, PhD, Duquesne University
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
February 11, 2015
Primary Completion (Actual)
June 6, 2017
Study Completion (Actual)
June 6, 2017
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
August 15, 2018
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 21, 2018
First Posted (Actual)
August 22, 2018
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
August 2, 2023
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 18, 2023
Last Verified
July 1, 2023
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2014-04-22
- UL1TR001857 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
IPD Plan Description
There is no plan to share.
Raw data is available through the peer review publication.
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pain
-
Flowonix MedicalApproved for marketingBack Pain | Leg Pain | Trunk Pain | Intractable Pain | Arm Pain
-
Boston Scientific CorporationRecruitingLow Back Pain | Chronic Pain | Chronic Low-back Pain | Leg Pain | Intractable Pain | Chronic Leg PainUnited States
-
University Hospital Schleswig-HolsteinZealand University Hospital; European Regional Development Fund; Design School...CompletedPain, Acute | Pain, Chronic | Pain Measurement | Pain, CancerGermany
-
Universitat Jaume ICompletedPain, Acute | Pain, Chronic | OncologySpain
-
Qi's ClinicNot yet recruitingNon-Cancer Pain,Musculoskeletal Pain,Chronic Pain,Acute Pain
-
University of Campinas, BrazilCompletedPREGNANCY | LUMBAR BACK PAIN | PELVIC PAIN
-
noiVita SrlsUniversity of Eastern PiedmontCompletedCervical Pain | Pain Management | Lumbar Pain | Muscular | Chronic Pain (Back / Neck)Italy
-
Chinese University of Hong KongNot yet recruitingPain, Acute | Chronic Post Operative Pain | Pain, ChronicHong Kong
-
Dow University of Health SciencesRecruitingLow Back Pain | Chronic Low-back Pain | Low Back Pain, Mechanical | Mechanical Low Back Pain | Pain, Chronic | Pain, Back | Lower Back Pain Chronic | CLBP - Chronic Low Back PainPakistan
-
University of SaskatchewanRoyal University Hospital FoundationCompletedPain | Pain, Acute | Pain, Chronic | Pain, IntractableCanada
Clinical Trials on Walking Exercise
-
South Dakota State UniversityCompletedObesity | Sarcopenia | Metabolic Syndrome X
-
Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital.Completed
-
National Defense Medical Center, TaiwanMinistry of Science and Technology, TaiwanRecruitingCardiology | PsychiatryTaiwan
-
University of Illinois at ChicagoNational Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)CompletedPeripheral Arterial DiseaseUnited States
-
University of FloridaRecruitingBreast Cancer | Fatigue | Cancer, Therapy-RelatedUnited States
-
Medipol UniversityCompletedCognitive Impairment | Brain Fog | Geriatric PopulationTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Qassim UniversityRecruitingKnee OsteoarthritisSaudi Arabia
-
Atlas UniversityCompletedFatigue | Autonomous Nervous SystemTurkey
-
Chulalongkorn UniversityCompleted
-
Beijing Sport UniversityRecruitingHypertension | Cognitive FunctionChina