Study of the Feasibility of Radiofrequency Ablation of Benign Thyroid Nodules (TRAF)

March 29, 2023 updated by: University Hospital, Toulouse

Study of the Feasibility of Radiofrequency Ablation of Benign Thyroid Nodules by Percutaneous Radiological Approach

The purpose of the present protocol is to evaluate the response rate to treatment of these symptomatic benign nodules with radiofrequency as an alternative to surgical treatment.

This thyroid nodules ablation with radiofrequency will be directed by a single percutaneous procedure guided by ultrasound. The procedure includes an ultrasound with percutaneously radiofrequency ablation of benign thyroid nodule. Clinical and ultrasonographic monitoring will last a year with consultations at 2 weeks (consultation only), 3 months, 6 months and 1 year (consultation, ultrasound TSH). The success of this procedure will be controlled with 3 successive ultrasounds the following year. The expected results are a decrease in the size of the nodule by at least 50% and a reduction in the functional and aesthetic discomfort, with less frequent complication than what is expected with surgery. The present study also intends to determine the medico economic impact of this technique compared to surgery.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Thyroid benign nodules represent a major public health problem because they are very common (subclinical nodules were found in half of woman beyond 60 years). The main risk factors include age, female gender, parity, smoking and family history of thyroid nodules or thyroiditis. The assessment is based on biology, ultrasound and fine needle aspiration and intends to determine the benign nature (95%) or cancer (5%) of the nodules and if they are functional or not (toxic nodule). Most benign nodules are asymptomatic but some of them because of their size and location can cause a functional disorder (compression or swallowing disorder) or aesthetic and psychological resounding.In current practice, these nodules are sometimes treated with surgery that impact on patient quality of life (need to take L-Thyroxine, difficulties related to the possible occurrence of complications like hypoparathyroidism or laryngeal paralysis) and socio-economic constraints especially when complications occur. To limit the number of unnecessary and potentially risky surgeries, patients should therefore be well selected. If surgery is the preferred treatment of thyroid cancer, alternative techniques like radiofrequency seem interesting for benign nodules.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Toulouse, France, 31400
        • CHU Toulouse, Hôpital Larrey

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Euthyroid or hypothyroidism properly substituted with normal TSH
  • Benin nodule proved by FNA (Bethesda) and normal Calcitonin
  • Nodule size> 1cm and / or increase in size
  • Single nodule or asymptomatic nodules associated
  • Symptomatic nodule with functional impairment and / or aesthetic Patient Agreement
  • Patient with insurance coverage
  • Written agreement for participation

Exclusion Criteria:

The exclusion criteria are related to the histological nature of the nodule and the necessary of the procedure:

  • Allergy to local anesthetics
  • FNA non-contributory or suspicious nodule (Bethesda)
  • Multiple nodules more than 2cm
  • Hyperthyroidism or hyperparathyroidism associated requiring surgical intervention.
  • Taking a treatment with anticoagulant or double antiplatelet
  • Patient with a Pacemaker
  • Contralateral laryngeal paralysis in nodule
  • Purely cystic nodule
  • Nodule in contact with the recurrent nerve
  • Patient Refusal
  • Pregnant and breastfeeding women
  • Patient trust, guardianship or safeguard justice.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Treatment with radiofrequency
Treatment of symptomatic benign nodules with radiofrequency ablation as an alternative to surgical treatment
The procedure will include an ultrasound with radiofrequency ablation of the benign thyroid nodule percutaneously

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Procedure response rate
Time Frame: 6 months
First estimate of the procedure response rate (patient with complete procedure in percentage)
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in nodular volume
Time Frame: at 6 and 12 months
compared to the volume measured at inclusion. This reduction will be estimated in absolute value and in relative value (percentage reduction for a given subject)
at 6 and 12 months
volume change of nodules by at least 50 percent, at 6 months
Time Frame: at 6 months
Percentage of patients with a volume decrease of at least 50 percent, 6 months after the procedure. Patients for which the procedure could not be fully performed will be counted among patients who have not had a reduction of at least 50 percent
at 6 months
volume change of nodules by at least 50 percent, at 12 months
Time Frame: at 12 months
Percentage of patients with a volume decrease of at least 50 percent, 12 months after the procedure. Patients for which the procedure could not be fully performed will be counted among patients who have not had a reduction of at least 50 percent
at 12 months
complete disappearance of symptoms
Time Frame: at 12 months
The symptoms will be evaluated by a visual analogue scale of 0 to 10 as proposed by the Korean consensus. The symptoms assessed will be: cervical pain, dysphagia, foreign body sensation, discomfort, coughing.
at 12 months
aesthetic change
Time Frame: at 3, 6 and 12 months
This improvement will be evaluated with a 4-level scale (no clinically detectable nodule 0, palpable nodule 1, visible nodule on swallowing 2, spontaneously visible nodule 3) as proposed by the Korean consensus. The improvement will be defined by the transition to the lower category.
at 3, 6 and 12 months
one or more complications
Time Frame: at 6 and 12 months
In particular, the following will be investigated: signs of cutaneous involvement such as burns, hematoma and intra-nodular bleeding, recurrent paralysis, superinfections, tracheal or esophageal wounds.
at 6 and 12 months
Assessment of pain during the procedure with visual analogue scale
Time Frame: between Day 1 and Day 15
Evaluation of the pain during the procedure using a visual analogue scale from 0 to 10 established at the end of the procedure
between Day 1 and Day 15
patients requiring L-thyroxine replacement therapy
Time Frame: at 6 and 12 months
Percentage of patients requiring L-thyroxine replacement therapy
at 6 and 12 months
Economic evaluation from the point of view of the hospital
Time Frame: Between Day 1 and 12 months
evaluation, from the point of view of the hospital, of the production cost of the new technique
Between Day 1 and 12 months
patients who have used analgesics
Time Frame: between Day 1 and Day 15
Percentage of patients who have used analgesics during and after the procedure
between Day 1 and Day 15
Economic evaluation from the point of view of the health insurance
Time Frame: Between Day 1 and 12 months
Evaluation, from the point of view of health insurance, of the cost of the care of patients who benefited from the new technique
Between Day 1 and 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 29, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 27, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

December 27, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 25, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 22, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

August 24, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 30, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 29, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Benign Thyroid Nodules

Clinical Trials on Radiofrequency ablation

3
Subscribe