FALCON Trial Testing Measures to Reduce Surgical Site Infection (FALCON)

September 24, 2019 updated by: University of Birmingham

Pragmatic Multicentre FActorial Randomised Controlled triaL Testing Measures to reduCe Surgical Site Infection in lOw and Middle Income couNtries

FALCON is a Pragmatic multi-centre trial testing measures to reduce superficial or deep skin infection following abdominal surgery in low and middle income countries. The trial will recruit patients undergoing abdominal surgery. Recruited participants will be randomly assigned to four arms to receive different combinations of skin preparation and sutures for would closure:

A. In this arm surgeon will use 2% alcoholic chlorhexidine for skin cleansing and non-coated suture for wound closure; B. In this arm surgeon will use 2% alcoholic chlorhexidine for skin cleansing and triclosan coated suture for wound closure; C. In this arm surgeon will use for operation 10% aqueous povidone-iodine for skin cleansing and non-coated suture for wound closure; D. In this arm surgeon will use 10% aqueous povidone-iodine for skin cleansing and triclosan-coated suture.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

FALCON is a pragmatic, blinded (patient and outcome assessor), 2x2 factorial, stratified, multi-centre randomised controlled trial, with an internal pilot, to evaluate measures to reduce Surgical Site Infection (SSI) rates in patients undergoing surgery with an abdominal incision.

Surgical site infection (SSI) represents a major burden for patients, doctors, and health systems across all settings. SSI is the commonest postoperative complication worldwide and the commonest healthcare-associated infection in low and middle income countries (LMICs). SSIs cause pain, discomfort, disability, and increase the time taken to return to work (3). SSIs increase healthcare costs in all health settings. Whilst there is no direct data on the costs of SSI in LMICs, within the UK National Health Service, SSIs cost approximately £3500 per patient and £700 million per year in total. The impact of increased healthcare costs on patients, communities, and providers can be major in LMICs where personal income is low and patients may be required to pay for their own treatment. SSI has also been associated with one-third of postoperative deaths and accounts for 8% of all deaths caused by a hospital acquired infection.

Strata in FALCON trial are defined according to the anticipated category of wound contamination: (1) clean-contaminated and (2) contaminated/dirty. Eligible patients will be randomised at the level of the individual in a 1:1:1:1 ratio between:

A. 2% alcoholic chlorhexidine and non-coated suture B. 2% alcoholic chlorhexidine and triclosan-coated suture C. 10% aqueous povidone-iodine and non-coated suture D. 10% aqueous povidone-iodine and triclosan-coated suture.

Participant will be recruited from hospitals in Low and Middle Income Countries (LMICs). Participants who is undergoing abdominal surgery with an anticipated clean-contaminated, contaminated or dirty surgical wound will be selected to enter the trial.

The 6 month internal pilot will assess the feasibility of recruitment, compliance with treatment allocation and patient retention and follow-up rates. The main RCT will recruit 5480 participants.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

5480

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Lagos, Nigeria
        • Recruiting
        • Lagos University Teaching Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 100 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with at least one abdominal incision that is ≥5cm (open or laparoscopic extraction site), with an anticipated clean-contaminated, contaminated or dirty surgical wound.
  • Patients undergoing emergency (surgery on an unplanned admission) or elective (surgery on a planned admission) operations.
  • Any operative indication, including trauma surgery.
  • Patient able and willing to provide written informed consent (signature or a fingerprint).
  • Paediatric and adult patients. This criteria is made country-specific. Each country decides the lower age limit for the trial. This is dependent on country-specific regulatory approvals. Age eligibility will vary by country.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a documented or suspected allergy to iodine, shellfish, or chlorhexidine skin preparation solution.
  • Patient unable to complete post-operative follow-up (i.e. will not be contactable after discharge).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 2%chlorhexidine + non-coated suture
2%alcoholic chlorhexidine + non-coated suture. Intervention: skin preparation with 2%alcoholic chlorhexidine in combination with non-coated suture for abdominal fascial closure.

Interventions:

2% alcoholic chlorhexidine non-coated suture

Active Comparator: 2%chlorhexidine + coated suture
2%alcoholic chlorhexidine + triclosan-coated suture. Intervention: skin preparation with 2%alcoholic chlorhexidine in combination with triclosan-coated suture for abdominal fascia closure.

Interventions:

2% alcoholic chlorhexidine triclosan coated suture

Active Comparator: 10% povidone-iodine + non-coated suture
10% povidone-iodine and non-coated suture. Intervention: skin preparation with 10% povidone-iodine in combination with non-coated suture for abdominal fascial closure.

Interventions:

10% povidone-iodine non-coated suture non-coated suture

Active Comparator: 10%povidone-iodine + coated suture
10%povidone-iodine/triclosan-coated suture. Intervention: skin preparation with 10% povidone-iodine in combination with triclosan-coated suture for abdominal fascial closure.

Interventions:

10% povidone-iodine triclosan coated suture

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Surgical site infection (SSI)
Time Frame: At 30-days post-surgery
Deep incisional or superficial incisional SSI which must occur within 30 days of the index operation. The infection must involve the skin, subcutaneous, muscular or fascial layers of the incision. Patient must at least have one of the following: (1) purulent discharge from wound; (2) organisms detected from wound swab; (3) Wound opened spontaneously or by a clinician AND, at the surgical wound, the patient has at least one of: pain or tenderness; localised swelling; redness; heat; systemic fever (>38°C); (4) Diagnosis of SSI by a clinician or on imaging.
At 30-days post-surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physiological parameter - SSI at discharge from hospital
Time Frame: Within 30-days post surgery from index operation
Deep incisional or superficial incisional SSI. The infection must involve the skin, subcutaneous, muscular or fascial layers of the incision and the patient must have one of the following: (1) purulent discharge from wound; (2) organisms detected from wound swab; (3) Wound opened spontaneously or by a clinician AND, at the surgical wound, the patient has at least one of: pain or tenderness; localised swelling; redness; heat; systemic fever (>38°C); (4) Diagnosis of SSI by a clinician or on imaging.
Within 30-days post surgery from index operation
Mortality - patient mortality status
Time Frame: Within 30-days post surgery from index operation
Mortality within 30-days post surgery
Within 30-days post surgery from index operation
Physiological parameter - Unplanned wound opening
Time Frame: Within 30-days post surgery from index operation
Whether an unplanned wound opening has occurred at abdominal surgical site within 30-days post surgery, spontaneously opened or by clinician
Within 30-days post surgery from index operation
Re-operation for SSI
Time Frame: Within 30-days post surgery from index operation
Re-operation for SSI within 30-days post surgery
Within 30-days post surgery from index operation
Length of hospital stay for index admission
Time Frame: Within 30-days post surgery from index operation
Length of hospital stay for index admission will be collected and will measure time from surgery to time of discharge.
Within 30-days post surgery from index operation
Participant's Readmission
Time Frame: Within 30-days post surgery from index operation
Whether patient readmitted within 30-days post surgery
Within 30-days post surgery from index operation
Questionnaire - return to normal activities
Time Frame: Within 30-days post surgery from index operation
Return to normal activities (e.g. work, school, or family duties) ascertained by trial specific questionnaire
Within 30-days post surgery from index operation
Resistance of organisms
Time Frame: Within 30-days post surgery from index operation
Resistance of organisms detected from wound swabs to prophylactic antibiotics administered within 1 hour of incision
Within 30-days post surgery from index operation
Questionnaire - Health resource usage
Time Frame: Within 30-days post surgery. Health resource usage will only be collected for adult patients (aged 18 and above) at pre-selected centres. This will include costs of post-operative visits to various healthcare professionals.
Health resource usage within 30-days post surgery ascertained by trial specific questionnaire
Within 30-days post surgery. Health resource usage will only be collected for adult patients (aged 18 and above) at pre-selected centres. This will include costs of post-operative visits to various healthcare professionals.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 29, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

July 31, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

July 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 23, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 5, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

October 9, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 26, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 24, 2019

Last Verified

September 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Abdominal Surgery

Clinical Trials on 2% chlorhexidine + non-coated suture

3
Subscribe