Hypnosis Mask: a New Approach to Management of Pain in Medical Imaging (HYPNOTIC)

December 16, 2025 updated by: University Hospital, Lille
The prostatic biopsies echo-guided are a painful and stressful. The purpose is to test a new medical device created recently, " Hypnos-Pro ", wich uses connected technologies. This connected device is a mask with diodes coupled with an audio headset and a touch pad. This connected mask is an another option to induce an hypnotic state for our patients. the objective is to value hypnotic mask effectiveness, to reduce the level pain and anxiety for the patients who benefit a prostatic biopsies echo-guided with local anesthesia.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

88

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Lille, France
        • Hôpital Claude Huriez, CHU

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient eligible for prostate biopsies
  • Having accepted and signed the consent, for performing a prostate biopsy ultrasound examination
  • No contraindication to the gesture
  • Supporting the left lateral decubitus

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient isolation contact / droplets
  • Patient with hearing and / or epilepticus and / or dementia and / or having a history of stroke and / or allergic to lidocaine
  • Person unable to consent, or benefiting from a system of legal protection (tutelage / curatorship).
  • Patients with epileptic seizures.
  • Patients with known allergies to plastics and other resins that may develop allergic contact dermatitis.
  • Patients who are hypersensitive to radio frequency.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Optimizing pain management
An experimental group receive a standard pain management and benefit the hypnotic mask (Hypnos pro).
4 injections of 2 cc of lidocaine for a Periprostatic nerve block

The mask HYPNOS pro stimulates the imagination of the user by means of 6 diodes among 3 by eye.

Just before the introduction of ultrasound probe, the patient put the hypnotic mask and choose a session.Twenty minutes after the removal of the probe, an healthworker assess the painful patient with the visual analogue scale VAS, after this the patient fulfill the STATE- TRAIT Anxiety Inventory (STAI) form Y-A.

Active Comparator: standard pain management
4 injections of 2 cc of lidocaine for a Periprostatic nerve block

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual analogic Scale
Time Frame: at 20 minutes after the removal of the probe
Measure the pain in the scale from 0 to 10
at 20 minutes after the removal of the probe

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
State-Trait Anxiety Inventory ou STAI forme Y-A
Time Frame: Baseline, at 20 minutes after the removal of the probe
Baseline, at 20 minutes after the removal of the probe
Percentage of positive response of satisfaction of the patient
Time Frame: at 20 minutes after the removal of the probe
The question is: Would you do prostate biopsy punctures under the same conditions in a month? (Yes: effective method, No: ineffective method).
at 20 minutes after the removal of the probe
Percentage of positive response of satisfaction of the operator
Time Frame: at 20 minutes after the removal of the probe
The question is: In your opinion, has the gesture been made optimally? (Yes/ No).
at 20 minutes after the removal of the probe

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Philippe Puech, MD,PhD, University Hospital, Lille

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 7, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 26, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

October 26, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 16, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 17, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

October 18, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 23, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 16, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2017_84
  • 2018-A01673-52 (Other Identifier: ID-RCB number, ANSM)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prostatic Diseases

Clinical Trials on Periprostatic nerve block

Subscribe