Randomised Controlled Trial to Assess Whether Computed Tomography Cardiac Angiography Can Improve Invasive Coronary Angiography in Bypass Surgery Patients (BYPASS-CTCA)

December 13, 2022 updated by: Queen Mary University of London

A Randomised Controlled Trial Assessing the Value of Computed Tomography Cardiac Angiography in Improving Patient Satisfaction and Reducing Contrast Load, Procedural Duration and Complications in Patients Who Had Previous Bypass Operation Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography

A large number of patients with symptomatic ischaemic heart disease undergo coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) to alleviate their symptoms and improve prognosis. Given the progressive nature of coronary disease, bypass grafts can narrow or block over time, leading to chest pain and the need for further invasive coronary angiography. Invasive coronary procedures in patients with bypass grafts can be more complicated due to the variation in bypass graft ostia. This can lead to longer procedure times, with higher doses of contrast and radiation and more discomfort for the patient. The aim of this study is to see if the use of computed tomography cardiac angiography (CTCA) in patients with previous bypass grafts prior to invasive coronary angiography will help make their procedure safer and quicker.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The BYPASS-CTCA trial is a single-centre, randomised controlled trial, which plans to recruit 688 patients who have had previous bypass grafts and require invasive coronary angiography over a period of 30 months.

Patients will be randomised to receive either computed tomography cardiac angiography (CTCA) prior to their invasive coronary angiogram, or invasive coronary angiography alone.

The primary endpoints will be the incidence of contrast induced nephropathy, the duration of the invasive coronary angiographic procedure and patient satisfaction. A number of secondary endpoints will also be looked at.

Findings from BYPASS-CTCA will potentially demonstrate that a CTCA prior to invasive coronary angiography in this cohort of patients reduces the incidence of contrast-induced kidney injury, the length of procedure and improves patients satisfaction. The results of this trial may influence future clinical practice guidelines in coronary artery bypass graft patients undergoing invasive coronary procedures.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

688

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients undergoing invasive coronary angiogram +/- percutaneous coronary Intervention
  2. Previous Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG)
  3. Aged ≥18
  4. Patients able and willing to give their written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subjects presenting with ST elevation myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock (systolic blood pressure <80 mmHg for >30 minutes, or requiring inotropes or emergency intra aortic balloon pump for hypotension treatment) or cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
  2. Subjects with eGFR <20ml/min or on renal replacement therapy.
  3. Current life-threatening condition other than vascular disease that may prevent a subject completing the study.
  4. Clinical instability including cardiogenic shock, hypotension (low blood pressure-systolic blood pressure less than 90 mmHg), sustained ventricular or atrial arrhythmia requiring intravenous medications.
  5. Inability to tolerate beta-blockers, including those with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma, complete heart block, second-degree atrioventricular block
  6. Known contrast dye allergy.
  7. Pregnancy or unknown pregnancy status.
  8. Patients considered unsuitable to participate by the research team (e.g., due to medical reasons, laboratory abnormalities, or subject's unwillingness to comply with all study related procedures).
  9. Inability or refusal to provide informed consent.
  10. Any inclusion criteria not met

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: CTCA + ICA
Computed Tomography Cardiac Angiography (CTCA) performed prior to invasive coronary angiogram (ICA).
Computed Tomography Cardiac angiography (CTCA) performed prior to invasive coronary angiogram (ICA).
Other Names:
  • Computed Tomography Cardiac angiography
No Intervention: ICA only
Invasive coronary angiogram (ICA) performed only.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Procedural duration
Time Frame: Interval between administration of local anaesthesia for obtaining vascular access and removal of the last catheter
Length of invasive coronary angiogram
Interval between administration of local anaesthesia for obtaining vascular access and removal of the last catheter
Incidence of Contrast Induced Nephropathy
Time Frame: 48-72hours
Defined by Kidney Disease: Improving Global outcomes (KDIGO) criteria
48-72hours
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 4-6hours
Patient satisfaction measured by validated questionnaire
4-6hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Contrast amount
Time Frame: From time of arterial sheath insertion to removal of arterial catheters
Contrast amount (mls) administered during invasive coronary angiogram
From time of arterial sheath insertion to removal of arterial catheters
Radiation exposure
Time Frame: From time of arterial sheath insertion to removal of arterial catheters
Radiation exposure (mSv) during invasive coronary angiogram
From time of arterial sheath insertion to removal of arterial catheters
Angiography related complications
Time Frame: 4-6hours
Angiography related complications (coronary or aortic dissection, stroke, bleeding, vascular access complications)
4-6hours
Radial access rate
Time Frame: From time of randomisation to end of invasive coronary angiogram procedure
Radial access rates during invasive coronary angiogram
From time of randomisation to end of invasive coronary angiogram procedure
Catheters used
Time Frame: From time of arterial sheath insertion to removal of arterial catheters
Number of catheters used during invasive coronary angiogram
From time of arterial sheath insertion to removal of arterial catheters
Computed Tomography Cardiac Angiography accuracy
Time Frame: From time of randomisation to end of invasive coronary angiogram procedure
Accuracy of the Computed Tomography Cardiac Angiography scan for detecting graft patency
From time of randomisation to end of invasive coronary angiogram procedure
Number of grafts not identified
Time Frame: From time of arterial sheath insertion to removal of arterial catheters
Number of grafts not identified during invasive coronary angiogram
From time of arterial sheath insertion to removal of arterial catheters
Cost effectiveness of computed tomography cardiac angiography
Time Frame: 12 months
Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER)
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Daniel Jones, MRCP, PhD, Queen Mary University of London

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 15, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 30, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 5, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 7, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

November 8, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 15, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 13, 2022

Last Verified

December 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

Trial protocol to be published

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Late 2018

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Freely available via journal

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Contrast-induced Nephropathy

Clinical Trials on CTCA

Subscribe