AI Driven National Platform for CT cOronary Angiography for clinicaL and industriaL applicatiOns Registry (APOLLO)

August 18, 2022 updated by: National Heart Centre Singapore

AI Driven National Platform for CT cOronary Angiography for clinicaL and industriaL applicatiOns Registry (APOLLO)

The overall aim is to build an AI driven national Platform for CT cOronary angiography for clinicaL and industriaL applicatiOns (APOLLO) for automated anonymization, reporting, Agatston scoring and plaque quantification in CAD. It is a "one-stop" platform spanning diagnosis to clinical management and prognosis, and aid in predicting pharmacotherapy response.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Coronary artery disease (CAD), a blockage of the blood vessels, affects 6% of the general population and up to 20% of those over 65 years of age. CAD is a leading cause of cardiac mortality in Singapore and worldwide, with 19% of deaths in Singapore due to CAD (MOH website).

Numbers of CAD cases are increasing due to ageing and the higher prevalence of contributary diseases such as diabetes. Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography (CTCA) is the first-line investigation for CAD as indicated by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines. Recent Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain (PROMISE) and Scottish Computed Tomography of the Heart (SCOT-HEART) trials support CTCA as the dominant means for evaluating coronary anatomy and physiology as it increases diagnostic certainty, improves efficiency of triage to invasive catheterization and reduces radiation exposure when compared to functional stress testing.

Currently, CAD report generation requires 3-6 hours of a CT specialist's time to annotate scans, with inter-observer variability of 20%. In addition, there is no effective singular toolkit to analyse Agatston scores (a measure of calcified CAD), severity of stenosis, and plaque characterisation.

These problems have severely constrained the effectiveness of CTCA as a diagnostic and research tool. The investigators plan to build upon Singapore's competitive advantages in artificial intelligence (AI) to provide a solution to these gaps.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

8000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Singapore, Singapore
        • Recruiting
        • National University Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Associate Professor Mark Chan
      • Singapore, Singapore, 169609
        • Recruiting
        • National Heart Centre Singapore
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Assoc. Prof Zhong Liang
      • Singapore, Singapore
        • Recruiting
        • Tan Tock Seng Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Dr Yew Min Sen

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients who are clinically evaluated by CTCA

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥21 years old
  2. Signed informed consent
  3. Clinically indicated for evaluation by CTCA

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Individuals unable to provide informed consent
  2. Known complex congenital heart disease
  3. Planned invasive angiography for reasons other than CAD
  4. Non-cardiac illness with life expectancy < 2 years
  5. Pregnancy
  6. Concomitant participation in another clinical trial in which subject is subject to investigational drug or device
  7. Cardiac event and/or coronary revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and/or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and/or valvular repair/replacement prior to CTCA
  8. Glomerular Filtration Rate ≤ 30mL/min
  9. Known allergy to iodinated contrast agent
  10. Contraindications to beta blockers or nitroglycerin or adenosine

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Retrospective
4000 patients who were clinically evaluated by CTCA from 1 Jan 2007 to 31 Oct 2017.
CTCA is performed as part of routine care procedure.
Prospective
4000 patients who are clinically evaluated by CTCA.
CTCA is performed as part of routine care procedure.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
AI precision toolkits: AI stenosis reporting
Time Frame: baseline

Stenosis reporting: Severity of stenosis and accurate anatomical localization of stenosis.

The significance of a stenosis is determined by visual estimation of the maximal grade of luminal narrowing caused by the plaque. As recommended in SCCT guideline (Leipsic et al., 2014) , coronary stenosis can be graded as minimal, mild, moderate, severe and total occluded separately. Following the guideline, a stenosis will be classified as obstructive and non-obstructive. The location of the stenosis uses the SCCT model (Leipsic et al., 2014)

baseline
AI precision toolkits: Agatston scoring
Time Frame: baseline
Agatston scoring: Agatston scoring of calcified plaque. As recommended in SCCT clinical practical guidelines (Leipsic et al., 2014), Agatston scoring programs generally identify pixels that exceed 130 HU as a level corresponding to calcium on a non-contrast study (Agatston et al., 1990) . The reader needs to identify each lesion discrete calcific focus) in each vessel distribution. The summed score for each vessel is generated by the scoring program based on an area-density (Agatston score) (Agatston et al., 1990) measurement of each calcified focus. The total coronary Agatston score is the sum of all calcified lesions in all coronary beds.
baseline
AI precision toolkits: Plaque
Time Frame: baseline
Plaque analysis: Plaque volume, burden, type and anatomical locations. Coronary segmentation and plaque analysis is performed for segments with diameter ≥1.5 mm. Location of plaque uses the SCCT model (Leipsic et al., 2014). For each plaque, the reader marks its start-and end-points, quantifies plaque area,volume and plaque burden, and specifies its type (non-calcified, calcified, or mixed) (Achenbach et al., 2004) . Additionally, non-calcified plaque can be further divided into low attenuation plaque (LAP). A HU <30 will signify LAP and >30 will signify non-LAP.
baseline
AI precision toolkits: EAT analysis
Time Frame: baseline
EAT analysis: Total volume and anatomical locations. EAT and pericardial adipose tissue (PAT) are metabolically active fat surrounding the coronary artery and the heart, being associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease (Villasante et al, 2019) . EAT can be quantified on non-contrast CT scans. The annotations on the CT scans are obtained by manually drawing the pericardium first to define the region. EAT is identified using the adipose tissue attenuation references between -190 and -30 HU (Oikonomou et al., 2018) . Due to the CT scan noise and changing of attenuation, the HU value of fat can vary, so the final EAT region is verified by an experienced radiologist or cardiologist.
baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
AI outcome analysis
Time Frame: one to five years from baseline
1. Mortality (All-cause and/or cardiovascular)
one to five years from baseline
AI outcome analysis
Time Frame: one to five years from baseline
Major-adverse cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, revascularisation, arrhythmias, etc)
one to five years from baseline
AI outcome analysis
Time Frame: one to five years from baseline
Re-hospitalisation
one to five years from baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Liang Zhong, National Heart Centre Singapore

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

October 1, 2021

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2027

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 19, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 18, 2022

First Posted (ACTUAL)

August 19, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

August 19, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 18, 2022

Last Verified

August 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Artery Disease

Clinical Trials on CTCA

3
Subscribe