Testing Feasibility of Motivational Interviewing for Patient-Reported Cancer Pain Goals

April 15, 2022 updated by: Olga Ehrlich, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
This research study is evaluating the acceptability and feasibility of using a cognitive behavioral intervention called Motivational Interviewing to help persons with pain from cancer set goals for managing that pain.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This study is being conducted to evaluate a new way that clinicians can help identify the goals that cancer participants have for managing their pain. This new method uses discussion between a patient and a clinician, in this case a registered nurse, during which one or more goals may be set. At this time, there are no tested methods that clinicians can use for helping patients set these kinds of goals.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

54

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
        • Dana Farber Cancer Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • At least 18-years of age
  • Has an appointment with DFCI ambulatory palliative care service for cancer-related pain
  • Can speak English

Exclusion Criteria:

-Diagnosis of delirium or other cognitive impairment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Motivational Interviewing
  • Will entail two-to-four Motivational Interviewing sessions per participant
  • Will include a battery of questionnaires
  • Investigator-led discussion about the participant's pain experience which is focused on the participant reporting of functional pain goals (FPGs).
  • The investigator will elicit questions and goals that participants will be encouraged to discuss with their palliative care providers
An investigator-led discussion about the participant's pain experience which is focused on the participant reporting of functional pain goals (FPGs)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility of Motivational Interviewing intervention
Time Frame: 1 year
The proportion of enrolled participants completing at least one follow-up Motivational Interviewing session (at least two sessions total). The proportion of participants completing at least one follow-up intervention session will be estimated along with an exact 90% confidence interval.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Motivational Interviewing intervention usage rate
Time Frame: 1 year
The number of interventions sessions attended divided by the total possible number of interventions sessions reported as the sample mean.
1 year
Participant intervention acceptability
Time Frame: 1 year
The Participant Experience Questionnaire, developed by the investigator, will be used to summarize overall patient-reported acceptability in this study. Summary measures of median/range and mean/SD for total categorical scores, the time in weeks from the initial to follow-up intervention visit, and the number of completed intervention sessions will be reported.
1 year
Attitudinal barriers to pain
Time Frame: 1 year
Attitudinal barriers to pain management will be measured using the Barriers Questionnaire-II which measures four attitudinal realms with 27 self-rated questions about pain beliefs. The total score will be calculated at study entry and after the first follow-up visit and scores will be summarized (median/range, mean/SD). If additional sessions are completed, the scores will be plotted over time and trends will be explored with graphical methods.
1 year
Pain Self-Efficacy
Time Frame: 1 year
Pain self-efficacy will be measured using the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire in which participants rate their confidence in daily living activities despite pain using a Likert-type scale.The total score will be calculated at study entry and after the first follow-up visit and scores will be summarized (median/range, mean/SD). If additional sessions are completed, the scores will be plotted over time and trends will be explored with graphical methods.
1 year
Observed engagement in goals-setting
Time Frame: 1 year

Observed engagement will be evaluated using the instrument developed by the investigator for this study in which discussions of behaviors indicating active goal setting will be tabulated and salient quotes will be extracted for dissemination. Categories are:

  1. pain as an obstacle
  2. what helped pain before
  3. life with controlled pain
  4. suggestions to control pain
  5. suggestions actually used
  6. help-seeking
1 year
Motivational Interviewing intervention fidelity
Time Frame: 1 year

Fidelity to Motivational Interviewing methods will be assessed on 33% of interviews using the Motivational Interviewing Skills for Health Care Encounters which is used to evaluate the degree to which the person providing the intervention follows five domains key to Motivational Interviewing.The domains are:

  1. Motivational Interviewing philosophy
  2. health interviewing
  3. motivation
  4. Motivational Interviewing principles
  5. interpersonal process

Each domain has specific behaviors that are rated as:

  1. deficient
  2. developing
  3. accomplished
  4. not applicable
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Olga Ehrlich, PhD, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 16, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 2, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

August 2, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 7, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 7, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

November 9, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 25, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2022

Last Verified

April 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 18-376

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Other Cancer

Clinical Trials on Motivational Interviewing

3
Subscribe