Effect of Intravaginal Prasterone on Symptoms of VVA in Women Under Treatment With an Aromatase Inhibitor for Breast Cancer

July 29, 2020 updated by: EndoCeutics Inc.

Effect of Intravaginal Prasterone (DHEA) on Moderate to Severe Symptoms of Vulvovaginal Atrophy Due to Menopause, in Women Under Treatment With an Aromatase Inhibitor for Breast Cancer - (Placebo-Controlled, Double Blind and Randomized Phase III Study)

The purpose of this study is to confirm the efficacy of intravaginal prasterone (DHEA) on moderate to severe (MS) and most bothersome symptoms (MBS) of vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) due to natural, surgical or treatment-induced menopause, in women with breast cancer who are under treatment with an aromatase inhibitor.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Phase 3

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

26 years to 76 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Main criteria:

  1. Natural, surgically- or treatment-induced postmenopausal women (non hysterectomized or hysterectomized) with breast cancer (stage 1 or 2) who is currently under treatment with an aromatase inhibitor and will remain on that treatment for the duration of the study.
  2. Women between 30 and 80 years of age
  3. Women having ≤5% of superficial cells on vaginal smear at baseline
  4. Women having a vaginal pH above 5 at baseline
  5. Women who have self-identified moderate or severe symptom(s) of vaginal atrophy

Exclusion Criteria:

Main criteria:

  1. Clinically significant metabolic or endocrine disease (including diabetes mellitus) not controlled by medication
  2. The administration of any investigational drug within 30 days of screening visit

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Placebo vaginal ovule daily for 12 weeks
Daily administration of one placebo vaginal ovule at bedtime
Experimental: Prasterone
Prasterone (DHEA) vaginal ovule daily for 12 weeks
Daily administration of one prasterone vaginal ovule at bedtime
Other Names:
  • Intrarosa

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change from Baseline to Week 12 in the Percentage of Superficial Cells
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks
Change from Baseline to Week 12 in the Percentage of Parabasal Cells
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks
Change from Baseline to Week 12 in Vaginal pH
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks
Change from Baseline to Week 12 in Moderate/Severe VVA symptom being Most Bothersome (MBS)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline to Week 12 in Moderate/Severe VVA symptom (not most bothersome)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks
Change from Baseline to Week 12 on arousal/lubrication domain of Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) questionnaire
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Individual domain score will be obtained by adding the scores of the individual questions that comprise the domain and multiplying the sum by the domain factor.
12 weeks
Change from Baseline to Week 12 on subjective arousal domain of FSFI
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Individual domain score will be obtained by adding the scores of the individual questions that comprise the domain and multiplying the sum by the domain factor.
12 weeks
Change from Baseline to Week 12 on desire domain of FSFI
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Individual domain score will be obtained by adding the scores of the individual questions that comprise the domain and multiplying the sum by the domain factor.
12 weeks
Change from Baseline to Week 12 on satisfaction domain of FSFI
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Individual domain score will be obtained by adding the scores of the individual questions that comprise the domain and multiplying the sum by the domain factor.
12 weeks
Change from Baseline to Week 12 on orgasm domain of FSFI
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Individual domain score will be obtained by adding the scores of the individual questions that comprise the domain and multiplying the sum by the domain factor.
12 weeks
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Secretions
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Vaginal parameter evaluated at gynecological examination by the physician/gynecologist will be graded as corresponding to none, mild, moderate, or severe atrophy.
12 weeks
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial Surface Thickness
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Vaginal parameter evaluated at gynecological examination by the physician/gynecologist will be graded as corresponding to none, mild, moderate, or severe atrophy.
12 weeks
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial Integrity
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Vaginal parameter evaluated at gynecological examination by the physician/gynecologist will be graded as corresponding to none, mild, moderate, or severe atrophy.
12 weeks
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Color
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Vaginal parameter evaluated at gynecological examination by the physician/gynecologist will be graded as corresponding to none, mild, moderate, or severe atrophy.
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Claude Labrie, M.D., Ph.D., Endoceutics, Inc., Quebec, Canada
  • Principal Investigator: David F Archer, M.D., Jones Institute, Norfolk VA 23507
  • Principal Investigator: Sheryl Kingsberg, Ph.D., MacDonald Women's Hospital, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 6, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 5, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

December 5, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 7, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 10, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

November 14, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 31, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 29, 2020

Last Verified

July 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Vaginal Atrophy in Breast Cancer Patients

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Subscribe