- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03792191
Ultrasonography Versus Palpation for Spinal Anesthesia in Obese Parturients Undergoing Cesarean Delivery
May 20, 2021 updated by: Mohamed Mohamed Tawfik, Mansoura University
The study will compare between preprocedural ultrasonography and the conventional palpation technique for spinal anesthesia in obese parturients undergoing elective cesarean delivery
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Detailed Description
This randomized, controlled, double-blind study will be conducted on ASA physical status II-III obese parturients with full-term singleton pregnancy undergoing elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia.
The study subjects will be assigned to 2 equal groups.
In the ultrasonography group, lumbar spinal ultrasonography will be performed before administration of spinal anesthesia.
In the palpation group, conventional palpation of the anatomical landmarks will be performed.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
280
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Dakahlia
-
Mansoura, Dakahlia, Egypt, 35511
- Department of Anesthesia, Mansoura University Hospitals
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
19 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
Female
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status II-III parturients
- Full term singleton pregnancy
- Body mass index ≥ 35 Kg/m2
Exclusion Criteria:
- Age < 19 years
- Women presenting in labor
- Contraindications to neuraxial anesthesia (Coagulopathy, increased intracranial pressure, or local skin infection)
- Significant spinal deformities or previous spinal surgery
- Preeclampsia
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Ultrasonography
Preprocedural lumbar spinal ultrasonography and skin marking.
Spinal anesthesia will be administered with injection of intrathecal bupivacaine and intrathecal fentanyl.
|
Ultrasonography of the lumbar spines using an 8-2 MHz curved array transducer.
Identification of the intervertebral space with the best image.
Marking the patient's skin with horizontal and vertical lines over the L3-L4 and L2-L3 intervertebral spaces.
Spinal anesthesia using a 25- or 22-gauge spinal needle
Bupivacaine 12.5 mg (2.5 mL 0.5%) will be administered in the subarachnoid space
Fentanyl 15 μg will be administered in the subarachnoid space
|
|
Active Comparator: Palpation
Sham ultrasound procedure.
Conventional landmark palpation and skin marking.Spinal anesthesia will be administered with injection of intrathecal bupivacaine and intrathecal fentanyl.
|
Spinal anesthesia using a 25- or 22-gauge spinal needle
Bupivacaine 12.5 mg (2.5 mL 0.5%) will be administered in the subarachnoid space
Fentanyl 15 μg will be administered in the subarachnoid space
Moving the ultrasound probe on the patient's back with the machine in the freeze position.
Conventional palpation of the anatomical landmarks.
The line crossing the iliac crests (Tuffier line) is assumed to cross the spine at L4 spinous process or L3-L4 intervertebral space.
Identification of the widest intervertebral space.
Marking the patient's skin with horizontal and vertical lines over the L3-L4 and L2-L3 intervertebral spaces.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Needle Passes Required to Obtain Free Cerebrospinal Fluid Flow
Time Frame: Assessed from starting the first attempt of spinal anesthesia until successful administration of spinal anesthesia, an average of 10 minutes
|
Needle pass is any forward introduction of the spinal needle after its complete or incomplete withdrawal, including the first attempt.
|
Assessed from starting the first attempt of spinal anesthesia until successful administration of spinal anesthesia, an average of 10 minutes
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Skin Punctures Required to Obtain Free Cerebrospinal Fluid Flow
Time Frame: Assessed from starting the first attempt of spinal anesthesia until successful administration of spinal anesthesia, an average of 10 minutes
|
Skin puncture is any separate skin puncture by the spinal needle after its complete withdrawal, including the first attempt.
|
Assessed from starting the first attempt of spinal anesthesia until successful administration of spinal anesthesia, an average of 10 minutes
|
|
Rate of Successful Obtaining of Free Cerebrospinal Fluid Flow at the First Needle Pass
Time Frame: Assessed from starting the first attempt of spinal anesthesia until successful administration of spinal anesthesia, an average of 10 minutes
|
Needle pass is any forward introduction of the spinal needle after its complete or incomplete withdrawal, including the first attempt.
|
Assessed from starting the first attempt of spinal anesthesia until successful administration of spinal anesthesia, an average of 10 minutes
|
|
Rate of Successful Obtaining of Free Cerebrospinal Fluid Flow at the First Skin Puncture
Time Frame: Assessed from starting the first attempt of spinal anesthesia until successful administration of spinal anesthesia, an average of 10 minutes
|
Skin puncture is any separate skin puncture by the spinal needle after its complete withdrawal, including the first attempt.
|
Assessed from starting the first attempt of spinal anesthesia until successful administration of spinal anesthesia, an average of 10 minutes
|
|
Duration of the Spinal Procedure
Time Frame: Assessed from enrollment in the study until completion of cesarean delivery
|
The duration from starting the first skin puncture by the spinal needle to obtaining free CSF flow
|
Assessed from enrollment in the study until completion of cesarean delivery
|
|
Patient Satisfaction
Time Frame: Assessed at 1 minute after intrathecal injection
|
Patient satisfaction from the procedure assessed immediately after intrathecal injection using a 5-point scale (1 = very unsatisfied; 2 = unsatisfied; 3 = fair; 4 = satisfied; and 5 = very satisfied).
|
Assessed at 1 minute after intrathecal injection
|
|
Number of Participants With Vascular Puncture
Time Frame: Assessed from starting the first attempt of spinal anesthesia until successful administration of spinal anesthesia, an average of 10 minutes
|
Number of participants with unintentional vascular puncture by the needle during performing the spinal procedure
|
Assessed from starting the first attempt of spinal anesthesia until successful administration of spinal anesthesia, an average of 10 minutes
|
|
Number of Participants With Paresthesia
Time Frame: Assessed from starting the first attempt of spinal anesthesia until successful administration of spinal anesthesia, an average of 10 minutes
|
Number of participants with paresthesia reported by the subjects during performing the spinal procedure
|
Assessed from starting the first attempt of spinal anesthesia until successful administration of spinal anesthesia, an average of 10 minutes
|
|
Number of Participants With Failure to Obtain Free Cerebrospinal Fluid Flow
Time Frame: Assessed from starting the first attempt of spinal anesthesia until successful administration of spinal anesthesia, an average of 10 minutes
|
Number of participants with failure to obtain free cerebrospinal fluid flow after adequate needle passes at 6 separate skin punctures.
|
Assessed from starting the first attempt of spinal anesthesia until successful administration of spinal anesthesia, an average of 10 minutes
|
|
Number of Participants With Failed Spinal Block
Time Frame: Assessed up to 20 minutes after intrathecal injection
|
Number of participants with failed spinal block defined as an upper sensory level below T6 assessed by pinprick.
|
Assessed up to 20 minutes after intrathecal injection
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Mohamed M Tawfik, MD, Mansoura University Hospital
- Principal Investigator: Mohamed A Tolba, MSc, Mansoura University Hospital
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
January 16, 2019
Primary Completion (Actual)
January 31, 2021
Study Completion (Actual)
January 31, 2021
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
January 1, 2019
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 1, 2019
First Posted (Actual)
January 3, 2019
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
May 24, 2021
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 20, 2021
Last Verified
May 1, 2021
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- MD.18.02.29
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
No
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cesarean Section
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruitingCesarean Section Complications | Cesarean Section Niche
-
Kutahya Health Sciences UniversityCompletedPregnancy | Cesarean Section | Elective Cesarean SectionTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Recep Tayyip Erdogan University Training and Research...CompletedCesarean Section Complications | Cesarean Section; DehiscenceTurkey
-
Ataturk UniversityUnknownCesarean Section Complications | Cesarean Section; Complications, Wound, Dehiscence | Cesarean Section, Repeated | Cesarean, Uterine Scar Thickness | Cesarean, Residual Myometrial ThicknessTurkey
-
Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical UniversityCenter for Perinatology and Pediatric Surgery, Almaty, Kazakhstan; Zhalyn Scientific...RecruitingSkin Wound Healing After Cesarean Section | Cesarean Section Scar HealingKazakhstan
-
Odense University HospitalHvidovre University Hospital; Smith & Nephew, Inc.; University of Southern Denmark and other collaboratorsCompletedSurgical Wound Infection | Cesarean Section; Dehiscence | Complications; Cesarean Section | Infection; Cesarean Section | Complications; Cesarean Section, Wound, Dehiscence | Wound; Rupture, Surgery, Cesarean SectionDenmark
-
Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research HospitalCompletedCesarean Section Complications | Cesarean Section; DehiscenceTurkey
-
Chiayi Christian HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
University Hospital, BordeauxMinistry of Health, FranceRecruiting
-
Mayo ClinicCompletedCesarean SectionUnited States
Clinical Trials on Lumbar Spinal Ultrasonography
-
Olympus Biotech CorporationCompleted
-
Ege UniversityCompletedPseudotumor CerebriTurkey
-
HaoxuanZhangRecruitingGene Product Sequence Variation | Lumbar Degenerative DiseasesChina
-
Rigshospitalet, DenmarkFrederiksberg University HospitalCompleted
-
Bitlis Eren UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
St. Olavs HospitalKarolinska InstitutetCompletedIntermittent Claudication | Spinal Stenosis
-
Bergman ClinicsMICN Lab, University Hospital ZurichCompletedLow Back Pain | Disk Herniated Lumbar | Spinal Stenosis LumbarFrance, Austria, Netherlands
-
Adiyaman University Research HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
Parker UniversityUniversity of Houston; Miami University; Whittier College; Private PracticeCompletedSpinal Stenosis LumbarUnited States
-
Seoul National University HospitalCompleted