Ultrasonography Versus Palpation for Spinal Anesthesia in Obese Parturients Undergoing Cesarean Delivery

May 20, 2021 updated by: Mohamed Mohamed Tawfik, Mansoura University
The study will compare between preprocedural ultrasonography and the conventional palpation technique for spinal anesthesia in obese parturients undergoing elective cesarean delivery

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This randomized, controlled, double-blind study will be conducted on ASA physical status II-III obese parturients with full-term singleton pregnancy undergoing elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. The study subjects will be assigned to 2 equal groups. In the ultrasonography group, lumbar spinal ultrasonography will be performed before administration of spinal anesthesia. In the palpation group, conventional palpation of the anatomical landmarks will be performed.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

280

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Dakahlia
      • Mansoura, Dakahlia, Egypt, 35511
        • Department of Anesthesia, Mansoura University Hospitals

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status II-III parturients
  • Full term singleton pregnancy
  • Body mass index ≥ 35 Kg/m2

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age < 19 years
  • Women presenting in labor
  • Contraindications to neuraxial anesthesia (Coagulopathy, increased intracranial pressure, or local skin infection)
  • Significant spinal deformities or previous spinal surgery
  • Preeclampsia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Ultrasonography
Preprocedural lumbar spinal ultrasonography and skin marking. Spinal anesthesia will be administered with injection of intrathecal bupivacaine and intrathecal fentanyl.
Ultrasonography of the lumbar spines using an 8-2 MHz curved array transducer. Identification of the intervertebral space with the best image. Marking the patient's skin with horizontal and vertical lines over the L3-L4 and L2-L3 intervertebral spaces.
Spinal anesthesia using a 25- or 22-gauge spinal needle
Bupivacaine 12.5 mg (2.5 mL 0.5%) will be administered in the subarachnoid space
Fentanyl 15 μg will be administered in the subarachnoid space
Active Comparator: Palpation
Sham ultrasound procedure. Conventional landmark palpation and skin marking.Spinal anesthesia will be administered with injection of intrathecal bupivacaine and intrathecal fentanyl.
Spinal anesthesia using a 25- or 22-gauge spinal needle
Bupivacaine 12.5 mg (2.5 mL 0.5%) will be administered in the subarachnoid space
Fentanyl 15 μg will be administered in the subarachnoid space
Moving the ultrasound probe on the patient's back with the machine in the freeze position.
Conventional palpation of the anatomical landmarks. The line crossing the iliac crests (Tuffier line) is assumed to cross the spine at L4 spinous process or L3-L4 intervertebral space. Identification of the widest intervertebral space. Marking the patient's skin with horizontal and vertical lines over the L3-L4 and L2-L3 intervertebral spaces.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Needle Passes Required to Obtain Free Cerebrospinal Fluid Flow
Time Frame: Assessed from starting the first attempt of spinal anesthesia until successful administration of spinal anesthesia, an average of 10 minutes
Needle pass is any forward introduction of the spinal needle after its complete or incomplete withdrawal, including the first attempt.
Assessed from starting the first attempt of spinal anesthesia until successful administration of spinal anesthesia, an average of 10 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Skin Punctures Required to Obtain Free Cerebrospinal Fluid Flow
Time Frame: Assessed from starting the first attempt of spinal anesthesia until successful administration of spinal anesthesia, an average of 10 minutes
Skin puncture is any separate skin puncture by the spinal needle after its complete withdrawal, including the first attempt.
Assessed from starting the first attempt of spinal anesthesia until successful administration of spinal anesthesia, an average of 10 minutes
Rate of Successful Obtaining of Free Cerebrospinal Fluid Flow at the First Needle Pass
Time Frame: Assessed from starting the first attempt of spinal anesthesia until successful administration of spinal anesthesia, an average of 10 minutes
Needle pass is any forward introduction of the spinal needle after its complete or incomplete withdrawal, including the first attempt.
Assessed from starting the first attempt of spinal anesthesia until successful administration of spinal anesthesia, an average of 10 minutes
Rate of Successful Obtaining of Free Cerebrospinal Fluid Flow at the First Skin Puncture
Time Frame: Assessed from starting the first attempt of spinal anesthesia until successful administration of spinal anesthesia, an average of 10 minutes
Skin puncture is any separate skin puncture by the spinal needle after its complete withdrawal, including the first attempt.
Assessed from starting the first attempt of spinal anesthesia until successful administration of spinal anesthesia, an average of 10 minutes
Duration of the Spinal Procedure
Time Frame: Assessed from enrollment in the study until completion of cesarean delivery
The duration from starting the first skin puncture by the spinal needle to obtaining free CSF flow
Assessed from enrollment in the study until completion of cesarean delivery
Patient Satisfaction
Time Frame: Assessed at 1 minute after intrathecal injection
Patient satisfaction from the procedure assessed immediately after intrathecal injection using a 5-point scale (1 = very unsatisfied; 2 = unsatisfied; 3 = fair; 4 = satisfied; and 5 = very satisfied).
Assessed at 1 minute after intrathecal injection
Number of Participants With Vascular Puncture
Time Frame: Assessed from starting the first attempt of spinal anesthesia until successful administration of spinal anesthesia, an average of 10 minutes
Number of participants with unintentional vascular puncture by the needle during performing the spinal procedure
Assessed from starting the first attempt of spinal anesthesia until successful administration of spinal anesthesia, an average of 10 minutes
Number of Participants With Paresthesia
Time Frame: Assessed from starting the first attempt of spinal anesthesia until successful administration of spinal anesthesia, an average of 10 minutes
Number of participants with paresthesia reported by the subjects during performing the spinal procedure
Assessed from starting the first attempt of spinal anesthesia until successful administration of spinal anesthesia, an average of 10 minutes
Number of Participants With Failure to Obtain Free Cerebrospinal Fluid Flow
Time Frame: Assessed from starting the first attempt of spinal anesthesia until successful administration of spinal anesthesia, an average of 10 minutes
Number of participants with failure to obtain free cerebrospinal fluid flow after adequate needle passes at 6 separate skin punctures.
Assessed from starting the first attempt of spinal anesthesia until successful administration of spinal anesthesia, an average of 10 minutes
Number of Participants With Failed Spinal Block
Time Frame: Assessed up to 20 minutes after intrathecal injection
Number of participants with failed spinal block defined as an upper sensory level below T6 assessed by pinprick.
Assessed up to 20 minutes after intrathecal injection

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Mohamed M Tawfik, MD, Mansoura University Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Mohamed A Tolba, MSc, Mansoura University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 16, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 1, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 1, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

January 3, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 24, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 20, 2021

Last Verified

May 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cesarean Section

Clinical Trials on Lumbar Spinal Ultrasonography

Subscribe