Fat Grafts With Adipose-derived Regenerative Cells for Soft Tissue Reconstruction in Children

October 15, 2021 updated by: Daniela S Tanikawa, Hospital Sirio-Libanes

Fat Grafts Supplemented With Adipose-derived Regenerative Cells for Soft Tissue Reconstruction in Children With Craniofacial Microsomia

Although first reports of the clinical use of adipose-derived regenerative cells (ADRC) suggest that this approach may be feasible and effective for soft tissue augmentation, there is a lack of randomized, controlled clinical trials in the literature. Hence, this study aimed to investigate whether a novel protocol for isolation of ADRC and their use in combination with fat tissue improve the long-term retention of the grafts in paediatric patients with craniofacial microsomia.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

To overcome problems associated with fat grafting, such as unpredictable clinical results and a low rate of graft survival, many innovative efforts and refinements of surgical techniques have been reported. For example, condensation of living tissue and removal of unnecessary components have been performed by centrifugation, filtration or gravity sedimentation; external mechanical force has been used to expand the recipient tissue as well as the overlying skin envelope; and a recent experimental study has suggested that repeated local injections of erythropoietin might enhance retention of grafted fat.

Based on the finding that aspirated fat tissue contains a much smaller number of adipose-derived regenerative cells (ADRC) compared with intact tissue and that these cells play pivotal roles in the adipose tissue remodeling after lipoinjection, the supplementation of fat grafts with stromal vascular fraction isolated from adipose portion of liposuction aspirates has been proposed as a method to compensate its relative deficiency of ADRC.

In the literature, there are at least three experimental studies demonstrating that supplementation of adipose progenitor cells enhances the volume or weight of surviving adipose tissue, and first reports of the clinical use of ADRC suggest that this approach may be feasible and effective for soft tissue augmentation.

However, since these studies represent level of evidence IV, which correspond to the publication of case series, there is a lack of randomized, controlled clinical trials comparing this method to current standard techniques.

Hence, this study aimed to fill this gap by investigating whether a novel protocol for isolation of ADRC and their use in combination with fat tissue improve the long-term retention of the grafts in paediatric patients with craniofacial microsomia.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • SP
      • São Paulo, SP, Brazil, 01329-010
        • Hospital Municipal Infantil Menino Jesus

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

10 years to 18 years (ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Unilateral craniofacial microsomia
  • 10 to 18 years old
  • Phenotype: (M0, M1 or M2) and (S1 or S2) according to the OMENS-Plus classification

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous facial soft tissue surgery
  • Absence of fat donor site

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: With ADRC
Supplementation of fat grafts with ADRC
Isolation of ADRC from fat aspirates and its use for supplementation of fat grafts.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Structural
Structural fat grafting
Fat grafts without supplementation of ADRC

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Volumetric analysis of both hemifaces
Time Frame: Preoperative, 1 month postoperative, 3 months postoperative and 6 months postoperative
Preoperative and 1, 3 and 6-months postoperative 3D-photogrammetry will be performed for volumetric measurements of both hemifaces using Vectra H1 software. Volumetric augmentation will be noticed for each patient by comparing the change between volumes of affected and unaffected hemifaces in the preoperative and 1, 3 and 6 months postoperative periods, which will be considered the retention volume. The percentage of fat graft survival will be determined as a ratio of the retention volume to the preoperative difference between volumes of affected and unaffected hemifaces.
Preoperative, 1 month postoperative, 3 months postoperative and 6 months postoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of viable cells
Time Frame: Intraoperative and immediate postoperative period
Immediately after the surgical procedure the number of viable cells isolated before and after the supplementation of the grafts will be counted using the trypan blue dye exclusion assay in a Neubauer chamber using the light microscope Nikon Eclipse TS100 (Nikon Instruments Inc., NY, USA). Next, immunophenotype characterization of cell populations on passage 1 will be done by flow cytometric analysis with the anti-human antibodies CD29, CD31, CD45, CD90, CD73 and CD105 (Becton, Dickinson and Company, NJ, USA) in a Guava EasyCyte flow cytometer running the Guava Express Plus software (Guava Technologies Hayward, CA, USA).
Intraoperative and immediate postoperative period

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 10, 2019

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

January 10, 2021

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

January 10, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 9, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 14, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

January 16, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

October 18, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 15, 2021

Last Verified

October 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Craniofacial Microsomia

Clinical Trials on Fat grafts supplemented with ADRC

3
Subscribe