Mobile Application for Improving Rehabilitation After Flexor Tendon Repair

August 19, 2019 updated by: Marianne Arner, Karolinska Institutet

Mobile Application for Improving Rehabilitation After Flexor Tendon Repair - A Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial.

Can a mobile application improve adherence, self-efficacy and range of motion after flexor tendon repair? A randomized controlled multicenter trial.

Aim Evaluate how the use of a mobile application will affect exercise adherence, range of motion and self-efficacy when compared to standard rehabilitation after flexor tendon repair. Method Multicenter randomized controlled trial. Patients with flexor tendon repair in zone I or II were included and rehabilitated with early active motion and followed 12 weeks post-surgery. Randomization was performed by a computer-generated concealed block to control (n=60) or intervention group (n=60). Both groups received standard rehabilitation according to early active motion. Intervention group also received a smart phone app including; exercise videos, push-notifications for exercise, exercise diary, written information on the surgery, rehabilitation, questions and answers. Evaluation was made at baseline, 2, 6- and 12-weeks after surgery. Primary outcome was physiotherapist rated adherence on the Sport Injury Adherence Scale (SIRAS). Secondary outcome was self-reported adherence, perceived self-efficacy, total Active range of motion (TAM) in the Proximal Interphalangeal (PIP) joint and Distal Interphalangeal (DIP) joint and perceived satisfaction with rehabilitation and information.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

101

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Malmö, Sweden
        • Department of Hand Surgery, Skane University Hospital
      • Stockholm, Sweden
        • Department of hand surgery, Södersjukshuset
      • Uppsala, Sweden
        • Department of hand surgery, Uppsala university hospital
      • Örebro, Sweden
        • Department of hand surgery, University hospital Örebro

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Over 18 years old,
  • Own a mobile phone, fluent in Swedish,
  • Suited for early active motion rehabilitation
  • Injury to one or both of the flexor tendons in the a finger

Exclusion Criteria:

  • concomitant fracture in the hand
  • tendon injury to flexor pollicis longus.
  • Extensor tendon injury in the same hand.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control
Standard treatment
Experimental: Intervention
Standard treatment and intervention (Smart phone application)
Smart phone application including exercise videos, push notifications for exercise, questions and answers, exercise diary.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sport injury adherence scale (SIRAS)
Time Frame: assessed at 2 weeks (totalt score range 3-15, higher value indicates better outcome)
Physiotherapist rated adherence questionnaire
assessed at 2 weeks (totalt score range 3-15, higher value indicates better outcome)
Sport injury adherence scale (SIRAS)
Time Frame: assessed at 6 weeks (totalt score range 3-15, higher value indicates better outcome)
Physiotherapist rated adherence questionnaire
assessed at 6 weeks (totalt score range 3-15, higher value indicates better outcome)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Self reported adherence
Time Frame: assessed at 2 and 6 weeks (total score range 0-100,higher value indicates better outcome )
Patient rated adherence questionnaire duration
assessed at 2 and 6 weeks (total score range 0-100,higher value indicates better outcome )
Self reported adherence
Time Frame: assessed at 2 and 6 weeks (total score range 0-100,higher value indicates better outcome )
Patient rated adherence questionnaire frequency
assessed at 2 and 6 weeks (total score range 0-100,higher value indicates better outcome )
Self reported adherence
Time Frame: assessed at 2 and 6 weeks (total score range 0-100, higher value indicates better outcome)
Patient rated adherence questionnaire quality
assessed at 2 and 6 weeks (total score range 0-100, higher value indicates better outcome)
Athlet injury self efficacy questionnaire (AISEQ)
Time Frame: baseline, 2 and 6 weeks (Change over time)
Patient reported self efficacy for rehabilitation
baseline, 2 and 6 weeks (Change over time)
Range of motion
Time Frame: assessed at 12 weeks (range 0-240,higher value indicates better outcome )
Total range of motion in the proximal interphalangeal and distal interphalangeal joints measured with a finger goniometer
assessed at 12 weeks (range 0-240,higher value indicates better outcome )

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Perceived satisfaction with rehabilitation
Time Frame: at 12 weeks (range 0-100, higher value indicates better outcome)
questions on a Likert scale regarding satisfaction of rehabilitation. "how do you perceive the rehabilitation after the operation?"
at 12 weeks (range 0-100, higher value indicates better outcome)
Perceived satisfaction with information
Time Frame: at 12 weeks (range 0-100, higher value indicates better outcome)
questions on a Likert scale regarding satisfaction of information: "how do you perceive the information after the operation?"
at 12 weeks (range 0-100, higher value indicates better outcome)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marianne Arner, Phd, Karolinska Institutet

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 10, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

May 10, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 15, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 18, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

January 23, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 20, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 19, 2019

Last Verified

August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • FlexortendonsSOS2018

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Flexor Digitorum Profundus Injury

Clinical Trials on Smart phone application

Subscribe