Better Evidence for Selecting Transplant Fluids (BEST-Fluids)

December 12, 2022 updated by: The University of Queensland

An Investigator-initiated, Pragmatic, Registry-based, Multi-centre, Double-blind, Randomised Controlled Trial Evaluating the Effect of Plasmalyte Versus 0.9% Saline on Early Kidney Transplant Function in Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation

End-stage kidney disease (ESKD) is a significant, expensive health problem. Kidney transplantation improves survival, quality of life, and is much cheaper than dialysis treatment for ESKD. However sometimes kidney transplants from a deceased donor function poorly after surgery, and a period of continued dialysis is needed, a condition known as delayed graft function (DGF). In addition to complicating recovery, DGF can adversely affect long-term kidney function and the health of the recipient.

Intravenous fluids given during and after transplantation (usually 0.9% sodium chloride or saline) are critical to preserve kidney transplant function, but there is evidence that 0.9% saline may not be the safest fluid to use due to its high chloride content.

BEST Fluids is a randomised controlled trial that aims to find out whether using a balanced low-chloride solution - Plasma-Lyte 148® - as an alternative to normal saline in deceased donor kidney transplantation, will improve kidney transplant function, reduce the impact of DGF, and improve long-term outcomes for patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

End-stage kidney disease is a significant public health problem worldwide, and its treatment imposes a high healthcare burden and cost. Kidney transplantation is considered the best treatment for ESKD, offering improved survival and quality of life at significantly lower cost that dialysis. However, many kidney transplants fail prematurely due in part due to injury sustained at the time of transplantation. Delayed graft function (DGF), i.e. the requirement for dialysis early after transplantation, affects approximately 30% of deceased donor kidney transplants, and increases the risk of graft failure and mortality.

Intravenous fluids are a critical, albeit inexpensive, aspect of care that impacts early transplant function with normal (0.9%) saline the current standard care at most centres. However, normal saline may in fact be harmful in the setting of kidney transplantation due to its high chloride content relative to plasma, causing metabolic acidosis, acute kidney injury and thus potentially increasing the risk of DGF. Utilising a balanced low-chloride crystalloid solution such as Plasma-Lyte 148® (Plasmalyte) as an alternative to 0.9% saline may therefore improve outcomes after kidney transplantation.

The BEST-Fluids study is an investigator-initiated, pragmatic, registry-based, multi-centre, double -blind randomised, controlled trial. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the effect in deceased donor kidney transplant recipients of intravenous therapy with Plasmalyte versus 0.9% saline, commencing pre-operatively and continuing until intravenous fluids are no longer required or 48 hours post-transplant (whichever is earliest), on DGF, defined as the requirement for dialysis in the first seven days post-transplant.

Patients admitted for a deceased donor kidney transplant at participating centres will be invited to participate in the study prior to transplant surgery. Following informed consent, participants will be randomised to receive either blinded Plasmalyte or blinded 0.9% saline for all intravenous fluid therapy purposes until 48 hours post-transplant. The volume and rate of fluid therapy will be determined by treating clinicians; all other treatments will be as per local standard of care. Participants will be enrolled, randomised and followed up using ANZDATA, the Australia & New Zealand Dialysis & Transplant Registry.

The trial was prospectively registered with Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) on 08/03/2017 (ACTRN12617000358347).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

808

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New South Wales
      • Randwick, New South Wales, Australia, 2031
        • Sydney Children's Hospital
      • Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 2145
        • Westmead Hospital
      • Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 2145
        • The Children's Hospital at Westmead
      • Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 2050
        • Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
      • Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 2031
        • Prince of Wales Hospital
    • Queensland
      • Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 4102
        • Princess Alexandra Hospital
      • Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 4101
        • Queensland Children's Hospital
    • South Australia
      • Adelaide, South Australia, Australia, 5000
        • Royal Adelaide Hospital
    • Victoria
      • Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3168
        • Monash Medical Centre
      • Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3084
        • Austin Health
      • Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3065
        • St Vincent's Hospital (Melbourne) Ltd
      • Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3168
        • Monash Children's Hospital
    • Western Australia
      • Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia, 6150
        • Fiona Stanley Hospital
      • Perth, Western Australia, Australia, 6009
        • Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital
      • Auckland, New Zealand, 1142
        • Starship Children's Hospital
      • Auckland, New Zealand, 1142
        • Auckland City Hospital
      • Christchurch, New Zealand, 8011
        • Christchurch Hospital
      • Wellington, New Zealand, 6021
        • Wellington Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adult or child with End-Stage Kidney Disease, of any cause, on maintenance dialysis, or who has pre-dialysis stage 5 chronic kidney disease with an estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate of <15 mL/min/1.73m2, AND
  2. Planned deceased donor kidney transplant from a brain-death (DBD) or circulatory-death (DCD) organ donor within 24 hours, AND
  3. Written informed consent, or consent given by their parent or guardian (if age <18), or other authorised person

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Planned live donor kidney transplant (except where this is cancelled in favour or transplantation from a deceased donor)
  2. Planned multi-organ transplant (dual or en-bloc kidney transplants are not excluded)
  3. Children of weight <20 kg, or a child that the treating physician believes should not be included in a study of blinded fluids due to their small body size
  4. Known hypersensitivity to the trial fluid preparations or packaging

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Plasma-Lyte 148 (approx. pH 7.4) IV Infusion
Plasma-Lyte 148 (approx. pH 7.4) IV Infusion intravenous fluid therapy will be used for all maintenance, replacement and resuscitation purposes from randomization onwards until 48 hours post-transplant, or until fluid therapy is no longer required, if earlier.
Plasma-Lyte 148 (approx. pH 7.4) IV Infusion is a sterile, clear, non-pyrogenic isotonic solution and when administered intravenously is a source of water, electrolytes and calories. Plasma-Lyte 148 intravenous infusion is indicated as a source of water & electrolytes or as an alkalinising agent.
Other Names:
  • Plasmalyte
  • Balanced crystalloid solution
  • Plasma-Lyte 148®
Active Comparator: 0.9% SODIUM CHLORIDE 9g/L injection BP
0.9% saline intravenous fluid therapy will be used for all maintenance, replacement and resuscitation purposes from randomization onwards until 48 hours post-transplant, or until fluid therapy is no longer required, if earlier.
Sodium chloride (0.9% saline) infusion is a sterile, non-pyrogenic solution of sodium chloride in Water for Injections. The concentration of sodium chloride is 154mmol/L. Sodium chloride (0.9%) intravenous infusion is indicated for extra-cellular fluid replacement and in the management of metabolic alkalosis in the presence of fluid loss, and for restoring or maintaining the concentration of sodium and chloride ions.
Other Names:
  • 0.9% saline
  • Normal saline
  • Isotonic saline

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The proportion of participants with Delayed Graft Function
Time Frame: 7 Days
Delayed Graft Function defined as receiving treatment with any form of dialysis in the first seven days after transplant
7 Days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Early Kidney Transplant Function
Time Frame: a. Duration of Delayed Graft Function - 12 Weeks; b. Rate of recovery of kidney transplant graft function - 2 Days

Early Kidney Transplant Function, a ranked composite of

  1. Duration of Delayed Graft Function Description: Participants who require dialysis within seven days post-transplant, the time from transplant to the final dialysis treatment in days (up to 84 days/12 weeks) will be ranked from best to worst (longer times are worse).
  2. Rate of recovery of kidney transplant graft function Description: for participants who do not require dialysis, graft function assessed using the creatinine reduction ratio on post-transplant day two (CRR2) will be ranked from best to worst (smaller reductions are worse).
a. Duration of Delayed Graft Function - 12 Weeks; b. Rate of recovery of kidney transplant graft function - 2 Days
Number of dialysis sessions
Time Frame: First 28 days post-transplant
The number of dialysis sessions
First 28 days post-transplant
Total duration of dialysis
Time Frame: 12 Weeks
The total duration of dialysis in days
12 Weeks
Creatinine reduction ratio from day 1 to day 2 post-transplant
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 2 post-transplant
Creatinine reduction ratio from day one to day two measured using serum assay, for those who do not require dialysis within the first 7 days
Day 1 to Day 2 post-transplant
Reduction in serum creatinine of greater than or equal to 10%
Time Frame: First 7 days post-transplant
The proportion of subjects with a reduction in serum creatinine of greater than or equal to 10% on three consecutive days in the first 7 days post-transplant
First 7 days post-transplant
Serum creatinine trends over 52 weeks
Time Frame: 12 months
Serum creatinine trends measured over 52 weeks
12 months
Incidence of serum potassium greater than or equal to 5.5 mmol/L
Time Frame: First 48 hours post-transplant
Serum potassium greater than or equal to 5.5 mmol/L measured by serum assay
First 48 hours post-transplant
Peak potassium level
Time Frame: First 48 hours post-transplant
Peak potassium level, measured by serum assay
First 48 hours post-transplant
Treatment for hyperkalaemia
Time Frame: First 48 hours post-transplant
Treatment for hyperkalaemia with dialysis, Ca2+-gluconate, insulin, beta-agonists, sodium bicarbonate or ion exchange resins in the first 48 hours post-transplant
First 48 hours post-transplant
Incidence of significant fluid overload
Time Frame: Baseline to day 2
Incidence of significant fluid overload defined as >5% weight gain
Baseline to day 2
Aggregate urine output
Time Frame: Until day 2 post-transplant
Aggregate urine output until day 2 post-transplant
Until day 2 post-transplant
Requirement for inotropic support (use of vasopressors or other drugs to maintain adequate blood pressure)
Time Frame: Intra- and post-operatively to Day 2
Requirement for inotropic support both intra- and post-operatively to Day 2
Intra- and post-operatively to Day 2
Number of acute rejection episodes
Time Frame: 12 months
Number of acute rejection episodes in the first 52 weeks as reported by ANZDATA routine data capture and as assessed by treating physicians
12 months
Number of renal transplant biopsies
Time Frame: First 28 days post-transplant
Number of renal transplant biopsies performed in the first 28 days post-transplant
First 28 days post-transplant
Death from all causes
Time Frame: Up to 52 weeks
Death from all causes up to 52 weeks
Up to 52 weeks
Graft survival
Time Frame: 12 months
Graft survival and death-censored graft survival as reported by ANZDATA and assessed by treating physician
12 months
Graft function
Time Frame: 4, 12, 26 and 52 weeks
Graft function (estimated glomerular filtration rate; eGFR) at 4, 12, 26 and 52 weeks
4, 12, 26 and 52 weeks
Health-related quality of life
Time Frame: Baseline, day 7, day 28, week 12, week 26, and week 52
Health-related quality of life measured using EuroQol EQ-5D-5L for adults, and EQ-5D-Y in children under 18 years. EQ-5D has descriptive and visual analogue scale (VAS). Descriptive system consists of five dimensions mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. VAS records patient's self-rated health on vertical visual analogue scale with endpoints best to worst health with 0 being worst and 100 being best health.
Baseline, day 7, day 28, week 12, week 26, and week 52
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: 12 months
Length of hospital stay over 12 months using linked data state and country based health data
12 months
Healthcare resource use
Time Frame: 12 months
Healthcare resource use over 12 months using linked data state and country based health data
12 months
Cost-effectiveness
Time Frame: 12 months
Cost-effectiveness over 12 months using linked data state and country based health data
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Michael Collins, MBChB,FRACP,PhD, Auckland District Health Board & The University of Auckland
  • Principal Investigator: Steven Chadban, BMed(hons),FRACP,PhD, Sydney Local Health District & The University of Sydney

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 26, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 29, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

May 3, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 21, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 31, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

February 4, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 14, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 12, 2022

Last Verified

September 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 15.02
  • ACTRN12617000358347 (Registry Identifier: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

Yes Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in the primary publication, after de-identification (text, tables, figures and appendices) will be available for individual participant data meta-analysis.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Beginning 2 years and ending 5 years following main publication. Proposals may be submitted up to 5 years following article publication. After 5 years, the data will be available in our University's data warehouse but without investigator support other than deposited metadata.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

An independent review board will assess proposals based on the following criteria: sound science, benefit-risk balancing and research team expertise.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on End Stage Kidney Disease

Clinical Trials on Plasma-Lyte 148 (approx. pH 7.4) IV Infusion

3
Subscribe