EEG and SEP Evaluation for Good and Poor Neurological Prognosis After Cardiac Arrest (ProNeCA)

April 26, 2019 updated by: Antonello Grippo, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi

EEG and SEP Evaluation for Good and Poor Neurological Prognosis After Cardiac Arrest: a Prospective Multicenter Cohort Trial (proNeCA)

Hypoxic-Ischemic-encephalopathy (HIE) is a severe and frequent neurological complication of successful cardiopulmonary-resuscitation after cardiac arrest (CA). Prognosticating neurological outcomes in patients with HIE is challenging and recent guidelines suggest a multimodal approach. Only few studies have analyzed the prognostic power of the association between instrumental tests and, in addition, most of them were monocentric, retrospective and evaluating only poor outcome.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Post-anoxic encephalopathy is a severe and frequent neurological complication of successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation and it is usually responsible for coma onset in patients surviving a CA. A reliable early assessment of the neurological prognosis is an important research goal because it could address CA patient management within intensive care units (ICUs).

However, prognosticating neurological outcomes in patients with HIE is challenging and recent guidelines suggest a multimodal approach. Only few studies have analyzed the prognostic power of the association between instrumental tests and, in addition, most of them were monocentric, retrospective and evaluating only poor outcome.

Thus, the investigators designed a multicenter prospective cohort study to assessing the prognostic power of the association of electroencephalogram(EEG) and somatosensory evoked potentials(SEPs) for the prediction of both poor and good neurological outcomes at different times after CA.

The principal aim of this study will be to evaluate the prognostic power of EEG performed in comatose patients within the first 12h after CA for good outcome prediction (cerebral performance categories CPC 1-2-3) and to evaluate its prognostic power for the poor outcome prediction (CPC 4-5) when performed at 24 and 72h after CA.

Moreover, the investigators will aim to evaluate if the combination of EEG and SEPs will allow to correctly identify a greater number of patients with both poor and good outcomes (when performed within the first 12h) and with poor outcomes (when performed after 72h) compared with the use of only a single test. In addition, the investigators will evaluate if the concordance of EEG/SEP patterns will increase the prognostic reliability obtained with a single test.

Finally, the investigators will aim to confirm if the prognostic power of the bilaterally absent(AA) SEP pattern for poor outcome prediction will be reliable at any time of recording after CA, and if other SEP pathological patterns will assume an analogous ominous prognostic significance.

ADDENDUM: after the conclusion of the enrollment we investigated the availability of brain CT data obtained within the first 24 hours after CA. In 7 over 13 centers, including the coordinator center (AOU Careggi, Florence) early brain CT data were available.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

400

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Firenze, Italy, 50134
        • AOU Careggi

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Every major patient after CA admitted to the follow intensive care unit: Careggi University Hospital (Firenze), which will be the coordinating center, San Giuseppe Hospital (Empoli), Bufalini Hospital (Cesena), Santa Maria delle Croci Hospital (Ravenna), Santa Maria NuovaHospital (Reggio Emilia), Ospedale Civile of Baggiovara (Baggiovara-Modena),Maggiore Hospital of Lodi (Lodi-Milano),San Raffaele Hospital (Milano), Ospedale Civile of Legnano (Legnano-Milano), Policlinico Umberto Primo (Roma), Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital (Perugia), San Salvatore Hospital (L'Aquila), Galliera Hospital (Genova)

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • male and female patients between 18 and 90 years of age and
  • comatose patients surviving after CA with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) <9

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients with surgical or traumatic causes of CA,
  • patients showing contemporary presence of other neurological diseases (i.e. traumatic brain injury or brain infarction),
  • patients with previous severe neurological diseases,
  • patients with remote pathological anamnesis showing severe diseases with life expectancy less than 6 months,
  • patients with previous severe disability,
  • contemporary presence of confounding factors that hamper clinical evaluation (in particular the consciousness state)
  • patients with contemporary absence of cortical response N20/P25 and lemniscal wave P14

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cerebral Performance Categories
Time Frame: Month 6
Neurological outcome will be the primary outcome measure and it will be assessed at 6 months after CA using CPC as follows: CPC 1, no or minor neurological deficits; CPC 2, moderate disability; CPC 3, severe disability; CPC 4, unresponsive wakefulness state and CPC 5, death. Neurological outcome will be dichotomized into 'good' (CPC 1-3) and 'poor' (CPC 4-5) outcomes
Month 6

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Electroencephalography, EEG
Time Frame: hour: 12-24-72
American Clinical Neurophysiology Society (ACNS) EEG terminology
hour: 12-24-72
Somatosensory Evoked Potentials, SEP
Time Frame: hour: 12-24-72
According to the cortical responses of each hemisphere
hour: 12-24-72
Brain CT
Time Frame: within 24 hours
Caudate nucleus(CN), putamen(PU) and posterior limb of the internal capsule(PIC) were bilaterally identified as circular (0.6cm2) regions of interest(ROIs) where density measurement (Hounsfield Units-HU) were performed. At the corpus callosum(CC) level, the density value was considered the same bilaterally. The GM/WM ratio at basal ganglia level was calculated as follows: GM/WM ratio= (CN+PU)/(CC+PIC)
within 24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 18, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 20, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

February 21, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 30, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 26, 2019

Last Verified

April 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • AOU Careggi

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neurological Prognosis Cardiac Arrest

Clinical Trials on Neurophysiological Prognosis

3
Subscribe