The Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Iguratimod in RA and Early RA Patients for 6 Months Treatment

November 16, 2023 updated by: Qiang Shu, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University

Prospective Clinical Study to Observe the Efficacy and Safety of Iguratimod in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients for 6 Months Treatment in China

This study is designed to observed prospectively the efficacy and safety of 6 months treatment of iguratimod alone, or with methotrexate (MTX), hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and prednisone step by step on Chinese rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and early rheumatoid arthritis (ERA) patients who were naïve or shown insufficiency response or intolerance to DMARDs. If volunteered, patients who completed the 6-month study can continue to follow our plans for 24 months.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

This study will enroll 200 cases of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and early rheumatoid arthritis (ERA) patients in China, who are naïve or shown insufficiency response or intolerance to DMARDs. The participants plan to be treated with iguratimod alone, or along with methotrexate (MTX)/ hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) / prednisone (Pred) step by step for 6 months if participants are in medium or high disease activity (DAS28≥3.2). Participants can choose to continue the study up to 24 months.The efficacy and safety of 6 months and 24 months Iguratimod treatment in RA and ERA patients will be evaluated with DAS28-ESR and other disease activity indices.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

400

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Shandong
      • Jinan, Shandong, China, 250012
        • Qilu hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 90 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria: -

  1. RA: Patients diagnosed based on 1987 ACR classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis(RA);
  2. ERA: Subjects diagnosed by the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR); or by 2012 Chinese classification criteria of early rheumatoid arthritis (ERA), and not match the 1987 ACR criteria for RA.
  3. Age ≥16 years;
  4. Extra-articular manifestations (such as pulmonary fibrosis, proteinuria, leukopenia and peripheral neuropathy ) of RA patients are stable or no significant progress;
  5. Patients can be naïve to any DMARDs, or relapse due to DMARDs drug suspended;
  6. Patients have a history of using csDMARDs including csDMARDs(methotrexate,leflunomide, hydroxychloroquine, sulfasalazine, tacrolimus) , any biologic DMARDs(TNFi,tocilizumab or Tofacitinib),glucocorticoid (prednisone,methylprednisolone) or Chinese traditional Medicine(including tripterygium Glycosides, sinomenine)for 3 months, but couldn't achieve clinical remission or intolerance;

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with acute or chronic infections such as active bacterial, viral, fungal, tuberculosis infection or active hepatitis B;
  2. Platelet counts(PLT) <80 x 10^9 / L, or white blood cell (WBC) <3 x 10^9 / L;
  3. Propionate acid aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) is two times higher than the upper limit of normal;
  4. Renal insufficiency: serum Cr ≥ 176 umol / L;
  5. Pregnant or nursing women (breastfeeding) ;
  6. Patients has a history of malignancy (cure time in less than 5 years);
  7. Patients with severe or poorly controlled hypertension, diabetes or cardiac dysfunction;
  8. Other comorbidities that cannot be treated with immune suppressants. In addition, once patients experience severe adverse drug reactions、ineffective treatment or rapid progression of rheumatoid arthritis, then quit this research.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Iguratimod
The participants plan to be treated with iguratimod alone, or along with methotrexate (MTX), hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) , prednisone (Pred) step by step
Iguratimod tablet,25mg, po, twice per day (Bid) prescribed at the beginning and adjusted due to patient response. Then may titer down until the endpoint.
Other Names:
  • T-614
MTX,7.5mg to 15mg, po, once per week (Qw) prescribed if needed and adjusted due to patient response or unacceptable toxicity develops.
Other Names:
  • methotrexate
HCQ,200mg, po, twice per day (Bid) prescribed if needed and adjusted due to patient response.
Other Names:
  • Hydroxychloroquine
Pred, 5-15mg, po, once per day (Qd) prescribed if needed and adjusted due to patient response
Other Names:
  • Prednisone

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The percentage of patients who achieve clinical remission at week 24 using European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria DAS28
Time Frame: week 24
The percentage of patients whose Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints (DAS28) achieve remission(DAS28-ESR≤ 2.6)and Low Disease Activity (DAS28-ESR ≤ 3.2). The DAS28 is a composite score derived from 4 of these measures,that is the count of tender joint count(TJC, 0-28)and swollen joint count(SJC, 0-28), measure erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR, mm/h) or C reactive protein (CRP, mg/L) and to make a patient assessment of disease activity i.e. 'global assessment of health' (GH) using a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS) with 0 = best, 100 = worst. DAS28 values were calculated as follows: DAS28- ESR = 0.56√(TJC) + 0.28√(SJC) + 0.70 ln ESR + 0.014 x GH. High disease activity: DAS28-ESR > 5.1; Moderate disease activity: 5.1≥ DAS28 > 3.2 to 5.1; Low disease activity (LDA) and Remission mean Clinical remission.
week 24

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The percentage of patients who achieve clinical remission using DAS28-ESR at week 12
Time Frame: week 12
The percentage of patients whose DAS28 achieve remission(DAS28-ESR≤ 2.6)and Low Disease Activity (DAS28-ESR ≤ 3.2) at week 12.
week 12
The percentage of patients who achieve clinical remission using DAS28-ESR at week 48
Time Frame: week 48
The percentage of patients whose DAS28 achieve remission(DAS28-ESR≤ 2.6)and Low Disease Activity (DAS28-ESR ≤ 3.2) at week 12.response states were classified as follows: good responders were patients with an improvement from baseline (△DAS28-ESR) of > 1.2 and a DAS28-ESR at week 12 ≤ 3.2. Moderate responders: △DAS28 > 1.2 and still DAS28 > 3.2 at week 12, or 1.2 ≥△DAS28 > 0.6 and DAS28 ≤ 5.1 at week 12. Nonresponders:△DAS28 ≤0.6 or DAS28 >5.1 at week 12. DAS28-defined remission was classified as a score of <2.6.
week 48
The percentage of patients who achieve clinical remission using DAS28-ESR at week 96
Time Frame: week 96
The percentage of patients whose DAS28 achieve remission(DAS28-ESR≤ 2.6)and Low Disease Activity (DAS28-ESR ≤ 3.2) at week 12Nonresponders:△DAS28 ≤0.6,or DAS28 >5.1 at week 24. DAS28-defined remission was classified as a score of <2.6.
week 96
Percentage of Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) -ESR Criteria Responders at week 12
Time Frame: week 12
△DAS28 indicates the decline of DAS28-ESR from the baseline to week 12. EULAR response states were classified as follows: good responders were patients with an improvement from baseline (△DAS28-ESR) of > 1.2 and a DAS28-ESR at week 12 ≤ 3.2. Moderate responders: △DAS28 > 1.2 and still DAS28 > 3.2 at week 12, or 1.2 ≥△DAS28 > 0.6 and DAS28 ≤ 5.1 at week 12. Nonresponders:△DAS28 ≤0.6 or DAS28 >5.1 at week 12. DAS28-defined remission was classified as a score of <2.6.
week 12
Percentage of Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)-ESR Criteria Responders at week 24
Time Frame: week 24
EULAR response states were classified as follows: DAS28-ESR Good responders: △DAS28 > 1.2 and DAS28 ≤3.2 at week 24. Moderate responders:△DAS28 > 1.2 and still DAS28 > 3.2 at week 24; or 1.2 ≥△DAS28 > 0.6 and DAS28 ≤ 5.1 at week 24. Nonresponders:△DAS28 ≤0.6,or DAS28 >5.1 at week 24. DAS28-defined remission was classified as a score of <2.6.
week 24
Percentage of Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)-ESR Criteria Responders at week 48
Time Frame: week 48
EULAR response states were classified as follows: DAS28-ESR Good responders: △DAS28 > 1.2 and DAS28 ≤3.2 at week 24. Moderate responders:△DAS28 > 1.2 and still DAS28 > 3.2 at week 24; or 1.2 ≥△DAS28 > 0.6 and DAS28 ≤ 5.1 at week 24. Nonresponders:△DAS28 ≤0.6,or DAS28 >5.1 at week 24. DAS28-defined remission was classified as a score of <2.6.
week 48
Percentage of Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)-ESR Criteria Responders at week 96
Time Frame: week 96
EULAR response states were classified as follows: DAS28-ESR Good responders: △DAS28 > 1.2 and DAS28 ≤3.2 at week 24. Moderate responders:△DAS28 > 1.2 and still DAS28 > 3.2 at week 24; or 1.2 ≥△DAS28 > 0.6 and DAS28 ≤ 5.1 at week 24. Nonresponders:△DAS28 ≤0.6,or DAS28 >5.1 at week 24. DAS28-defined remission was classified as a score of <2.6.
week 96
Percentage of participants achieving ACR/EULAR remission at week 12
Time Frame: week 12
If all of the following 4 parameters are fulfilled, it is defined as remission: TJC ≤ 1, SJC ≤ 1, CRP ≤ 1 mg/dL, Patient global assessment(PGA) ≤ 1 cm (on a visual analog scale ranging from 0-10 cm, with higher scores indicating severe disease).
week 12
Percentage of participants achieving ACR/EULAR remission at week 24
Time Frame: week 24
If all of the following 4 parameters are fulfilled, it is defined as remission: TJC ≤ 1, SJC ≤ 1, CRP ≤ 1 mg/dL, Patient global assessment(PGA) ≤ 1 cm (on a visual analog scale ranging from 0-10 cm, with higher scores indicating severe disease).
week 24
Percentage of participants achieving ACR/EULAR remission at week 48
Time Frame: week 48
If all of the following 4 parameters are fulfilled, it is defined as remission: TJC ≤ 1, SJC ≤ 1, CRP ≤ 1 mg/dL, Patient global assessment(PGA) ≤ 1 cm (on a visual analog scale ranging from 0-10 cm, with higher scores indicating severe disease).
week 48
Percentage of participants achieving ACR/EULAR remission at week 96
Time Frame: week 96
If all of the following 4 parameters are fulfilled, it is defined as remission: TJC ≤ 1, SJC ≤ 1, CRP ≤ 1 mg/dL, Patient global assessment(PGA) ≤ 1 cm (on a visual analog scale ranging from 0-10 cm, with higher scores indicating severe disease).
week 96
Percentage of American College of Rheumatology [ACR] 20 Criteria Responders every 3 months
Time Frame: Up to week 96
Percentage of American College of Rheumatology [ACR] 20 Criteria Responders every 3 months
Up to week 96
Change from baseline Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI)
Time Frame: Up to week 96
The SDAI is a composite score derived from these measures,that is the count of tender joint count(TJC, 0-28), swollen joint count(SJC, 0-28), C-reactive protein (CRP, mg/L), Patient global assessment(PGA)and physician global assessment(PHGA), each of the last two was assessed on a visual analog scale ranging from 0-10 cm, with higher scores indicating severe disease. SDAI score will be calculated with formula SDAI = TJC + SJC + PGA+PHGA+ CRP. SDAI score exceeding 26 is considered high disease activity; 11 <SDAI ≤26,moderate disease activity; 3.3 <SDAI ≤11, low disease activity; remission is SDAI score ≤ 3.3.
Up to week 96
Change from baseline Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI)
Time Frame: Up to week 96
CDAI is a composite score derived from these measures,that is the count of tender joint count(TJC, 0-28), swollen joint count(SJC, 0-28), Patient global assessment(PGA)and physician global assessment(PHGA), each of the last two was CDAI score will be calculated with formula CDAI = TJC + SJC + PGA + PHGA. CDAI > 22 is considered high disease activity; 10 <CDAI ≤ 22, moderate disease activity; 2.8 <CDAI ≤10, low disease activity; remission is CDAI score ≤2.8.
Up to week 96
Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP)
Time Frame: Up to week 96
Change from Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP), a component index of ACR20 and SDAI, CRP will be measured with blood samples.
Up to week 96
Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)
Time Frame: Up to week 96
Change from Baseline in ESR, that is a component index of ACR20, DAS28-ESR and SDAI, ESR will be measured with blood samples.
Up to week 96
Change from baseline Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
Time Frame: Up to week 96
Change from Baseline in HAQ-DI, a participant assessed measure of health assessment, shaveing eight dimensions of functional activity: pruning, dressing, rising, eating, walking, personal hygiene, reach, grip, and other routine activities. Each item on a single scale has 4 degrees ranging from 0 (no functional difficulty) to 3 (unable to do), with higher scores indicating severe disease.
Up to week 96
Incidence of participant withdrawal
Time Frame: Up to week 96
Percentage of participants who withdraw from this study.
Up to week 96
Number of participants with"adverse events (AEs)"
Time Frame: Up to week 96
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a subject, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Number of participants with"adverse events (AEs)"i.e. physical exam abnormalities,vital sign abnormalities,laboratory value abnormalities,symptom or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product.
Up to week 96

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Ming Lv, Dr., Qilu Hospital of Shandong University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

October 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 15, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 23, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

February 26, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 17, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 16, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Arthritis, Rheumatoid

Clinical Trials on Iguratimod

Subscribe