Secondary Versus Tertiary Wound Closure in High Risk Gynecologic Abdominal Surgical Incisions

March 30, 2026 updated by: Wake Forest University Health Sciences
The purpose of this research study is to determine if closing a surgical wound differently is better than the procedure that is currently used. The wound will be closed with what is considered "tertiary intent." This means, rather than leaving the wound open, the wound will be partially closed after surgery, and then completely closed 4-7 days after surgery. The investigators also want to see how this new wound closure process affects your quality of life.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Primary Objective

To compare the percentage of patients whose wound remained closed on postoperative day #30 after tertiary closure compared to historical controls who underwent secondary would closure. We are primarily looking at time to wound closure. We will be able to abstract this information from the postoperative clinic visit notes from patients in the "historical control" cohort. We will identify 20 patients with characteristics described in the inclusion criteria of this study who underwent laparotomy with secondary would closure during the calendar year 2018.

Secondary Objectives

To compare the proportion of acute and chronic wound infection in wounds closed with a tertiary closure technique to historical controls receiving a secondary wound closure.

To compare the length of stay of patients receiving a tertiary wound closure to historical controls receiving a secondary wound closure.

To describe the number of patients receiving a tertiary wound closure that return within 30 days of surgery as compared to historical controls receiving a secondary wound closure.

To describe the quality of life in patients receiving a tertiary wound closure.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

8

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157
        • Comprehensive Cancer Center of Wake Forest University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with high risk class II, class III, class IV abdominal wounds
  • Undergoing laparotomy for gynecologic related disorders
  • Patients undergoing laparotomy for both benign and malignant diagnoses will be included in this study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Allergy to triclosan
  • Patients undergoing HIPEC

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Tertiary Wound Closure
In the alternative tertiary wound closure, the wound will be partially closed rather than being left open. Sutures in the skin will be placed but not closed. A vacuum assisted closure device will be placed over the wound to help healing. After 4-7 days, the vacuum device will be removed, and the participant's doctor will close the wound.
The wound will be closed with what is considered tertiary wound closure. This means, rather than leaving the wound open, the wound will be partially closed after surgery, and then completely closed 4-7 days after surgery.
Active Comparator: Historical Wound Closure
The standard approach to your wound would be to leave it partially open and let it heal over a period of 3-6 months ("secondary closure").
Participants wounds are left partially open to heal.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Wound Closures Comparing Tertiary Wound Closure Versus Historical Controls Postoperative Day 30
Time Frame: 30 days after tertiary wound closure
The number of surgical wounds that remained closed at postoperative day #30 after tertiary wound closure as compared to historical controls receiving a secondary wound closure.
30 days after tertiary wound closure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Length of Hospital Stay
Time Frame: Up to 3 months after surgery
The length of stay as defined by the time from surgery to discharge as compared to historical controls receiving a secondary would closure.
Up to 3 months after surgery
Number of Participants With Surgical Site Infections (SSI) for Tertiary Technique Versus Historical Controls
Time Frame: 30 days after tertiary wound closure
The number of Surgical Site Infections (SSI) within 30 days using a tertiary closure technique compared to historical controls receiving a secondary would closure.
30 days after tertiary wound closure
Proportion of Patients Returning After Surgery
Time Frame: Up to 30 days after surgery
The proportion of patients that return to hospital within 30 days of surgery.
Up to 30 days after surgery
Quality of Life Questionnaire SF-36 (Version 1)
Time Frame: Up to 3 months after tertiary wound closure
The quality of life is estimated only in patients receiving a tertiary wound closure. Groups of questions were transformed into a 0-100 scale for eight domains. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
Up to 3 months after tertiary wound closure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael G Kelly, MD, Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 27, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 26, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

November 26, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 25, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 28, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

March 4, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 17, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 30, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB00055298
  • P30CA012197 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • NCI-2019-01292 (Other Identifier: National Cancer Institute)
  • CCCWFU04418 (Other Identifier: Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Surgical Incision

Clinical Trials on Tertiary Wound Closure

Subscribe