Comparison of NOSE and Conventional Methods in Laparoscopic Right Colon Surgery

October 10, 2019 updated by: Ersin Gündoğan, Inonu University
Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (LRH) is an accepted surgical procedure for several right sided colonic pathologies. Recently the advantages of the intracorporeal ileotransversostomy over the extracorporeal anastomosis is appearing in the literature. Additionally, specimen extraction through the natural orifices is an emerging method when combined with the totally laparoscopic procedures. Our observations on natural orifice surgery was promising . In our daily surgical practice, investigators prefer the intracorporeal anastomosis and this study was conducted to compare the specimen extraction sites after LRH. Here investigators aimed to compare the results of conventional and natural orifice specimen extractions (NOSE) after totally LRHs.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

compare the patient-selected NOSE method and conventional method in laparoscopic right colon cancer surgery

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

52

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Turkey
      • Malatya, Turkey, 44090
        • İnonu University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • laparoscopic right hemicolectomy patients

Exclusion Criteria:

  • no

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: natural orifice
Patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery and removed the specimen from the natural orifice will be gathered. demographic data and perioperative results will be compiled
Procedure: natural orifice
laparoscopic right colon surgery and patients who are removed from the natural orifice and conventional will gather
Other Names:
  • conventional
No Intervention: conventional
patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery and removed specimen with conventional will be gathered. demographic data and perioperative results will be compiled. (conventional extraction is suprapubic or median incision)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
VAS control
Time Frame: 6 years
Visual Analog Score for pain (1-10 score)
6 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Inonu University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 25, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

March 28, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 3, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 27, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

April 4, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 14, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 10, 2019

Last Verified

October 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2017/27-5

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Surgical Incision

Clinical Trials on natural orifice

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Chile

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe