Comparison of Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty and Total Hip Arthroplasty With Dual Mobility Cup

March 14, 2019 updated by: shah fahad, Aga Khan University

Comparison of Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty and Total Hip Arthroplasty With Dual Mobility Cup in the Treatment of Old Active Patients With Displaced Neck of Femur Fracture

This study is conducted with the aim to compare the functional outcome, rate of dislocation, complications and mortality after treatment of displaced neck of femur fracture with bipolar hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty with dual mobility cuff.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This study is conducted with the aim to compare the functional outcome, rate of dislocation, complications and mortality after treatment of displaced neck of femur fracture with bipolar hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty with dual mobility cuff.

This study is conducted with the aim to compare the functional outcome, rate of dislocation, complications and mortality after treatment of displaced neck of femur fracture with bipolar hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty with dual mobility cuff.

A retrospective cohort study will be conducted at our tertiary care level 1 trauma center .ERC approval wwill taken from Ethical Review Committee of the hospital. Patients of age group more than 60 year who underwent hip arthroplasty (bipolar hemiarthroplasty or THA with dual mobility implant) between 2015 and 2017 for displaced neck of femur fracture with a complete follow up for one year were included.

Both groups will be assessed for postoperative complications including surgical complications (dislocation, periprosthetic fracture and surgical site infection), one year mortality and functional outcome via Harris hip score at the latest follow up.

Data will be analyzed using SPSS version 20.Chi-sqaure test was used to compare categorical variables whereas independent sample T-test was used to compare continuous variables. P-value of <0.05 was considered significant

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

104

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

. Patients of age group more than 60 years old with hip fracture treated via bipolar hemiarthroplasty or total hip replacement with dual mobility cup

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • . Patients of age group more than 60 year who underwent hip arthroplasty (bipolar hemiarthroplasty or THA with dual mobility implant) between 2015 and 2017 for displaced neck of femur fracture with a complete follow up for one year

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient who underwent hip arthroplasty for other indications, patients younger than 60 years patient with pathological fractures, patient with missing records and patients lost to follow up

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
group 1
Bipolar hemiarthroplasty grop
hip replacement with bipolar hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty dual mobility done and patients was followed
group 2
Total hip replacement dual mobility group
hip replacement with bipolar hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty dual mobility done and patients was followed

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
mortality
Time Frame: one year
death within one year of index surgery
one year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
functional outcome
Time Frame: one year
harris hip score used to determine functional outcome
one year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2015

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 31, 2017

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 31, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 13, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

March 14, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

March 15, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 14, 2019

Last Verified

March 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dislocations

Clinical Trials on surgery with implant for hip fracture

Subscribe