Constraint Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT)- Neuroimaging Predictors of Positive Response to Constraint (OBI_CIMT)

Childhood Hemiplegic CP Integrated Neuroscience Discovery Network (CP-NET) Theme IIIa: Constraint Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT)- Neuroimaging Predictors of Positive Response to Constraint

CIMT has shown great promise in helping children and adults regain lost function in a disabled limb by forcing its use through an intensive motor training program and constraining the unaffected arm with a cast. However, relatively little is known about the underlying mechanisms of CIMT in hemiplegic CP. This project will use an integrated translation model to explore neuroimaging predictors of a positive clinical response to CIMT.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The primary research objective is to evaluate neuroimaging predictors of a positive response to CIMT in children with hemiplegic CP secondary to a middle cerebral artery territory stroke (MCA). A focus on the MCA territory is chosen as (1) it targets children with significant hand impairment who have the potential to benefit from CIMT, (2) is the most common neuropathological subtype, and (3) allows for enhanced homogeneity for the matching of case and comparison groups. The primary research question is: In children aged 7 to 16 years with hemiplegic CP secondary to an MCA stroke, are there neuroimaging predictors of a positive response to CIMT, a positive response being defined by an improvement in the Assisting Hands Assessment (AHA) one month after CIMT?

Neuroimaging predictor variables include laterality index (LI) of the primary M1 and S1 areas on fMRI, IHI evaluated by resting state fMRI, dissociation of the M1 and S1 for the hemiplegic hand measured by fMRI, size and vascular distribution of the MCA lesion with T2 weighted MRI, and white matter tract abnormality with Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI). We hypothesize that a negative LI, a non-dissociated M1 and S1, low IHI, small size of infarction, and large size of the contralateral corticospinal tract will predict a positive response to constraint. An evaluation of the neuroimaging predictor variables on the persistence of a positive response to CIMT at 6 months as measured by the AHA will also be explored. A secondary objective will evaluate change in the neuroimaging variables from baseline to one month post CIMT by comparing children in the case group who have received CIMT and a comparison group who are matched on baseline QUEST scores.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

26

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8L 8E7
        • McMaster Children's Hospital, Hamilton Health Sciences
      • London, Ontario, Canada, N6G1G9
        • Thames Valley Children's Centre, London Health Sciences Centre
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M4G1R8
        • Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

7 years to 16 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of Hemiplegic CP secondary to an MCA infarct
  • Age between 7 and 16 years
  • Ability to co-operate, understand, and follow simple instructions for neuro-imaging outcome measurement: The functional MRI protocol will require some cooperation and the child will need to lie still in a confined place for approximately 45-60 min.
  • No previous CIMT within 12-months of study entry or Botulinum toxin upper limb injections within 6-months of study entry.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: CIMT
A standardized CIMT protocol will be administered over a three week period. The first week will consist of wearing a below elbow cast on the non-hemiplegic limb followed by a two week CIMT camp (5 hours per day, 5 days per week) where the child/youth wears a constraint splint on the non-hemiplegic hand. The two week camp will follow a standardized CIMT camp protocol ("Hand2Hand" developed at HBKRH) that includes activities that focus on unilateral hemiplegic hand activity in the first week and increasing incorporation of bilateral hand activities in the second week. The camp protocol for CIMT is based on camp protocols utilized successfully in other paediatric research studies.
A standardized CIMT protocol will be administered over a three week period. The first week will consist of wearing a below elbow cast on the non-hemiplegic limb followed by a two week CIMT camp (5 hours per day, 5 days per week) where the child/youth wears a constraint splint on the non-hemiplegic hand. The two week camp will follow a standardized CIMT camp protocol ("Hand2Hand" developed at HBKRH) that includes activities that focus on unilateral hemiplegic hand activity in the first week and increasing incorporation of bilateral hand activities in the second week. The camp protocol for CIMT is based on camp protocols utilized successfully in other paediatric research studies.
No Intervention: Comparison
Standard therapy.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in Assisted Hand Assessment
Time Frame: baseline, 1-month after intervention and 6-months
The primary outcome measure for this study will be the assisted hand assessment (AHA). This test is the gold standard in paediatric constraint research to assess the use of the assisting hand in bilateral activities (hand use) in children with hemiplegic CP with established reliability, validity and responsiveness. Importantly it has undergone the rigour of a Rasch analysis in its development.
baseline, 1-month after intervention and 6-months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Darcy L Fehlings, MD MSc, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 12, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 16, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

July 17, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 12, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 11, 2016

Last Verified

January 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy

Clinical Trials on Casting & CIMT

3
Subscribe