A Trial Comparing Acute Toxicity in Patients With Gynecological Cancer Treated With VMAT (ATGCRT)

November 12, 2023 updated by: David Cantu, National Institute of Cancerología

A Randomized Open-label Trial Comparing Acute Toxicity in Patients With Gynecological Cancer Treated With Adjuvant Conventional Versus VMAT Radiotherapy.

This is a randomized, controlled, open-label, prospective and longitudinal clinical trial. Rectal, intestinal and bladder EBRT-related toxicity will be assessed according to RTOG / EORTC scales at the first day of EBRT, during the 2nd, 3rd and 4th week of treatment, and 1, 3 and 6 months after the end of radiation treatment. The assessment of quality of life (QoL) will be measured by completing the questionnaire of the European Organization for Research and the Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) version 3.0, in addition to specific QoL questionnaires for cervical and endometrial cancer respectively (EORTC QLQ-CX 24 and EORTC QLQ-EN24), previously validated in Mexican Spanish-speaking population, and which will be simultaneously applied with the RTOG / EORTC toxicity scales.

EXPECTED RESULTS AND PERSPECTIVES:

This trial aims to provide information about the feasibility of using a newer EBRT technique, as effective as conventional 3D-conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT), but with less toxicity.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

BACKGROUND:

The standard of care in gynecological malignancies with high-risk features of recurrence following surgery is adjuvant external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in the pelvic region, with or without concurrent chemotherapy (CT). This treatment modality offers higher local control and improves overall survival. EBRT has been associated with secondary effects due to toxicity such as cystitis, enteritis and proctitis which can compromise its effectiveness, patient´s quality of life and the interruption of the treatment. Newer EBRT techniques reduce the radiation dosis in normal tissues, with less toxicity. So far, there are no records of radiation-induced toxic effects in our population. The aim of this study is to evaluate the acute toxicity associated with pelvic postoperative EBRT using conventional or VMAT (RapidArc) technique in patients with gynecological cancer.

METHODOLOGY:

This is a randomized, controlled, open-label, prospective and longitudinal clinical trial. Rectal, intestinal and bladder EBRT-related toxicity will be assessed according to RTOG / EORTC scales at the first day of EBRT, during the 2nd, 3rd and 4th week of treatment, and 1, 3 and 6 months after the end of radiation treatment. The assessment of quality of life (QoL) will be measured by completing the questionnaire of the European Organization for Research and the Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) version 3.0, in addition to specific QoL questionnaires for cervical and endometrial cancer respectively (EORTC QLQ-CX 24 and EORTC QLQ-EN24), previously validated in Mexican Spanish-speaking population, and which will be simultaneously applied with the RTOG / EORTC toxicity scales.

EXPECTED RESULTS AND PERSPECTIVES:

This trial aims to provide information about the feasibility of using a newer EBRT technique, as effective as conventional 3D-conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT), but with less toxicity.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Tlalpan
      • Mexico City, Tlalpan, Mexico, 14080
        • David Cantu de Leon

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients with cervical or endometrial cancer with an indication of adjuvant radiotherapy after surgical treatment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients that reject to participate in the trial
  • previous treatment with pelvic radiotherapy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Conventional radiotherapy
patients with gynecological cancer treated with adjuvant conventional radiotherapy
Radiotherapy focus on pelvis area
Experimental: Volumetric modulated arc therapy
Patients with gynecological cancer treated with adjuvant VMAT radiotherapy
VMAT therapy focuses on reducing the dose radiation in adjacent organs at risk

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acute Toxicity measured by toxicity scales
Time Frame: 1 year
The acute toxicity will be measured, with RTOG acute radiation morbidity scoring criteria scale, this has four grades from 0 to 4, and higher values represent a worse outcome. The principal symptoms to evaluate are genitourinary and lower gastrointestinal.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of life measured by questionnaire
Time Frame: 1 year

measured by completing the questionnaire of the European Organization for Research and the Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) version 3.0, previously validated in Mexican Spanish-speaking population.

The QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales, three symptom scales, a global health status / QoL scale, and six single items..

All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level.

Thus a high score for a functional scale represents a high / healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status / QoL represents a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale / item represents a high level of symptomatology / problems.

1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 10, 2018

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 15, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 1, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 31, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

April 2, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 14, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 12, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 018/053/ICI CE/1309/18

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gynecologic Cancer

Clinical Trials on conventional radiotherapy

Subscribe