Assessment of the Safety and the Performance of the SAGITTA EVL R Stems in Hip Arthroplasties

Retro-prospective and Observational Study of 120 Patients for the Assessment of the Safety and the Performance of the SAGITTA EVL R Stems in Hip Arthroplasties

Total hip arthroplasty is the preferred treatment for hip disease (primary or secondary osteoarthritis, osteonecrosis, for example) and femoral neck fractures. Revision risk factors reported when considering the main surgical approaches. Studied from the Dutch arthroplasty registry found a revision rate in hemiarthroplasty (HA) of 1.6% at 1 year and 2.5% at 5 years postoperatively. For total hip replacement (THA), the rate was 2.4% at 1 and 4.3% at 5 years postoperatively. Analyze shows that the risk factors for hemiarthroplasty were male sex, age under 80 (regardless of gender), posterolateral approach and uncemented fixation. The risk factors for HAT were exactly the same, but they found that smoking also played a role. It should be noted that age as a risk factor for revision is not a risk during the first year after the fracture, but becomes one in the years that follow.

In order to maintain compliance with the directive on medical devices (93/42 / EEC [M5]) and the future regulation (EU) (2017/745) relating to medical devices, SERF has set up post-market clinical follow-ups ( PMCF). This PMCF study aims to improve knowledge related to the performance, safety and benefit / risk ratio of the Sagitta EVL-R stem and to monitor patient care strategy through this clinical evaluation. Significant clinical results as well as safety must be confirmed with this patient cohort. It is important to note that this cohort reflects the specific care strategy of the University Hospital of Poitiers. Therefore, the strategy could be different between hospitals and countries.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

120

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Poitiers, France, 86000
        • Chu de Poitiers

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Recruitment 120 adults patients representing 124 hips operated between 2011 and 2014.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients over 18 years old.
  • Patients that were treated with the sagitta EVL-R stem for an indication of arthroplasty and according to the Instruction For Use (IFU).
  • Primary or secondary arthrosis,
  • Advanced joint destruction resulting from rheumatoid arthritis or traumatic arthritis,
  • A fracture or an avascular necrosis,
  • Following a previous surgical operation, on condition that the new device does not interfere with the material in place.
  • indicated in the case of primary or secondary arthrosis, displaced sub-capital or transcervical fracture as well as stages I and IIB bone loss according to the PAPROWSKI classification.
  • The SAGITTA EVOLUTION for REVISION implant is recommended for indications according to the bone loss classifications of SOFCOT stages I to VI, PAPROSKY types I to VI and the AAOS types Ia to Ic.
  • Dysplasia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient presenting a contraindication indicated in the IFU.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Survival Rate of Stems
Time Frame: at 5 years follow-up
at 5 years follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Satisfaction
Time Frame: at 5 years follow-up
The information will be collected from the patient by answering a Yes/No question at last follow-up. The following result correspond to the number of patients that have been satisfied
at 5 years follow-up
Functional Improvement
Time Frame: at 5 years follow-up

The information will be collected from both the patient through questionnaires to compare preoperatively situtation to last follow-up situtation. The patient will estimate the improvement in 3 scales: improved/unchanged/Worsen.

The result present number of patient answering improved.

at 5 years follow-up
Pain Release
Time Frame: at 5 years follow-up
The information will be collected from both the patient through questionnaires to compare preoperatively situtation to last follow-up situtation. The patient will estimate the pain diminution with 2 options: Yes or No diminution of pain. Result presents the number of patient having pain diminution
at 5 years follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Louis-Etienne GAYET, MD, Poitiers University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 24, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 26, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

November 8, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 29, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 29, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

December 10, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 29, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 22, 2024

Last Verified

September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2019-06-EVLR-N

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hip Arthropathy

Clinical Trials on Total Hip Arthroplasty Revision

Subscribe