Patient-Reported Outcomes in Head and Neck Cancer (DAHANCA PRO)

October 26, 2023 updated by: Helle Pappot, Rigshospitalet, Denmark

Management of Side Effects in Head and Neck Cancer by Systematic Use of PRO During Radiotherapy- The National DAHANCA PRO Study

Weekly electronic reporting of patient-reported outcomes will be tested in a national trial in participants undergoing radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.

The study is a national study under the Danish Head and Neck Cancer Group (DAHANCA) and all 6 centers in Denmark will participate.

The clinical endpoints will be:

  • Quality of life
  • Objective toxicity score (DAHANCA)
  • Opioid treatment
  • Tube feeding
  • Weight loss
  • Hospitalization
  • Compliance to treatment

Study Overview

Detailed Description

There is a high level of evidence for improved disease control in head and neck cancer (HNC) using regimens with accelerated radiotherapy and concomitant chemotherapy. These intense regimens can result in severe acute and late side effect. The standard approach for documenting symptomatic adverse events (AEs) in cancer clinical trials involves investigator reporting using the National Cancer Institute's (NCI's) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). In Denmark, the Danish Head and Neck Cancer Group (DAHANCA) toxicity score has been used as an instrument in assessing objective treatment induced toxicity. New research in other cancer treatments indicate, that systematic patient assessment of side effects may improve treatment outcome. Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) can be used for symptom monitoring. Interactive use of PRO may secure early recognition of specific symptoms in the individual patient and timely management of side effects.

This trial it is a prospective nationwide, single armed sequential cohort study will investigate the effects of active use of PROs in clinical counselling and decision making during primary or post-operative curative radiotherapy for squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC). It will investigate quality of life and the management of side effects in standard clinical counselling (control group) versus standard clinical counselling plus the PRO (PRO group). The EORTC QLQ-C30 (quality of life questionnaire) and EQ-D5-L5 will be answered in both groups. In the PRO group the participants will be asked to complete the electronic PRO (PRO CTCAE™ HNC relevant items supplemented by HNC specific items fra the EORTC library) weekly. The electronic PRO questionnaire is designed to give feedback to treating physician and nurses at visits during and shortly after radiotherapy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

291

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Aalborg, Denmark
        • Recruiting
        • Aalborg University Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Maria Andersen, MD
      • Copenhagen, Denmark
        • Recruiting
        • Herlev Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Elo Andersen, MD
      • Copenhagen, Denmark
        • Recruiting
        • Rigshoapitalet
        • Contact:
          • Claus A. Kristensen, MD, PhD
      • Næstved, Denmark
        • Completed
        • Zealand Hospital
      • Odense, Denmark
        • Recruiting
        • Odense University Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Jørgen Johansen, MD, PhD
      • Århus, Denmark
        • Recruiting
        • Aarhus University Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Hanne Primdahl

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Primary or post-operative curative radiotherapy (photons) plus/minus concomitant Cisplatinum for squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC)
  • No serious cognitive deficits
  • Read and understand Danish

Exclusion Criteria:

•Prior radiotherapy in the same area (head and neck)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control group
First phase. 97 participants. This group will continue standard procedure regarding side effect registration and handling. When the 97 patients have been included and have finished their radiotherapy the second phase will be initiated.
Experimental: PRO group
Second phase. 194 participants. This group will be assigned to the intervention which is weekly electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes. Patients report the symptoms (PRO) on a tablet before each weekly control visit. The clinician will use the patients PRO answers as part of the consultation. The PRO symptoms consist of head and neck relevant items fra PRO-CTCAE™ (Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) and EORTC (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer) item library.
Weekly reporting of patient-reported outcomes on a tablet for closer contact between patient and clinic during radiotherapy.
Other Names:
  • Real-time guidance of patients when symptom reporting
  • Patient Self-Reporting of Symptoms

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of life measured by EORTC QLQ C30
Time Frame: With in the first 2 months
Registration of differences in quality of life between the two groups in the study. EORTC QLQ-C30(scale range 0-100, a higher score indicating better quality of life) will be used for as quality of life measurement. The scores will be presented graphically in separate figures. Differences between the groups will be tested using t-test and analysis of covariance.
With in the first 2 months
Quality of life (QOL) measured by EuroQol EQ-5D-5L.
Time Frame: With in the first 2 months
EQ-5D-5L measures individual generic health status using 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression, and each dimension has 5 levels depending on severity of symptoms (1 no problems, 5 extreme problems) and a VAS (visual analogue scale). The scores can then be converted into a single index number. The index value will be used for calculation of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for a health economic analysis of the intervention. The scores will be presented graphically in separate figures. Differences between the groups will be tested using t-test and analysis of covariance.
With in the first 2 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
DAHANCA toxicity score
Time Frame: Within the first 4 months
DAHANCA toxicity score is an objective grading of the patients symptoms by the clinician. Scale 0-4, where 0 is no/nothing and 4 is severe. Registration of differences in DAHANCA toxicity score and electronic PRO
Within the first 4 months
Weight loss
Time Frame: Within the first 4 months
Registration of differences in weight loss in the two groups.
Within the first 4 months
Hospitalization due to toxicity expect tube-feeding and patients reported experience
Time Frame: Within the first 4 months
Number of hospitalizations reported in the medical record at the control visit 2 months after end af radiotherapy
Within the first 4 months
Compliance to cisplatinum
Time Frame: Within the first 2 months
Number of participants completing planned Cisplatinum
Within the first 2 months
Time to opioid treatment
Time Frame: Within the first 3 months
Registration of differences in time to opioid treatment in the two groups
Within the first 3 months
Time to tube-feeding/other feeding
Time Frame: Within the first 3 months
Registration of differences in time to Time to tube-feeding/other feeding in the two groups
Within the first 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 13, 2019

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 10, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 16, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

April 17, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 27, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 26, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Head and Neck Cancer

Clinical Trials on Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome

3
Subscribe