Additional Effect of Pain Neuroscience Education to Orofacial and Neck Exercises in Temporomandibular Disorders

November 30, 2023 updated by: Thais Cristina Chaves, University of Sao Paulo

Additional Effect of Pain Neuroscience Education to Orofacial Manual Therapy and Orofacial and Neck Motor Control Exercises for Pain Intensity and Disability in Temporomandibular Disorders: a Randomized Clinical Trial

The objective of this study will be to verify the additional effect of Pain Neuroscience Education program to orofacial manual therapy and orofacial and neck motor control exercises for pain intensity and disability and for the secondary outcomes pain self-efficacy, kinesiophobia, and overall perception of improvement in patients with Temporomandibular Disorders (TMD). This study will be a randomized clinical trial comprising a sample of 148 participants. Subjects will undergo a screening process to verify those presenting a diagnosis of painful TMD confirmed by the Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC/TMD), between 18 and 55 years of both genders, and then the volunteers will be randomized into two groups (G1: Pain Neuroscience Education + Orofacial Manual Therapy/orofacial exercises/neck motor control exercises vs. G2: Orofacial Manual Therapy/orofacial exercises/neck motor control exercises). These volunteers will be recruited at the Dentistry Clinic of the University of São Paulo's School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto - University of São Paulo. The intervention will be administered twice a week for 6 weeks by a single therapist lasting 1 hour per session. The primary outcome will be pain intensity and disability and the secondary outcomes will be pain self-efficacy, kinesiophobia and overall perception of improvement. The participants will be assessed immediate after the last session and at one and three-month follow-ups.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

148

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • São Paulo
      • Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil, 14049-900
        • University of Sao Paulo

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 55 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • A diagnosis of painful TMD Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (RDC/TMD)
  • A history of orofacial pain at least three months prior to the study (TREEDE et al, 2015)
  • age ranging between 18 to 55 years, considering the greater prevalence of TMD associated with this age period.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with illiteracy, severe depression (medical diagnoses), clinical history of tumors in the craniofacial region, patients in the post dental surgery period or submitted to previous physical therapy in the past year or to any health/pain education strategy, pregnant women, infections, whiplash-associated disorders and with chronic degenerative inflammatory or neurologic disorders were excluded from this study. Patients will be instructed to not use pain relief medications during the intervention period of this trial and if any medication be used, participants will be encouraged to report.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Pain Neuroscience Education + orofacial and neck exercises
All participants in this arm will initially receive two additional sessions in which a workshop on PNE will be administered and discussed. A power-point presentation with metaphors and animated videos will be employed. The PNE program will be held in 2 sessions of 30 minutes each. A protocol of Orofacial Exercises and Manual Therapy will be adopted in the present study. A protocol of neck motor control protocol will be adopted in our study. The exercises will be administered during six weeks, twice a week. One session will run in the outpatient clinic and the other will be home based. Half of the sessions will be comprised of orofacial strategies and the other half neck motor control exercises. Each exercise and technique will be administered 10 times for 10 seconds.
A power-point presentation with metaphors and animated videos will be employed. The PNE program will be held in 2 sessions of 30 minutes each. The intervention program will be divided into 17 thematic topics according to Explain Pain.
A protocol of Orofacial Exercises and Manual Therapy will be adopted in the present study. The manual therapy techniques will be: Intraoral temporalis release, Intraoral medial and lateral pterygoid (origin) technique and Intraoral sphenopalatine ganglion technique.
Two mandibular exercises: Mandibular body-condylar cross-pressure chewing technique and Post-isometric relaxation stretches-laterotrusion and opening. Each exercise will be executed 10 times per session for 10 seconds.
A protocol of neck motor control protocol will be adopted in our study. The exercises included bracing exercises (six hierarchical levels) in neurodevelopment stages for the cervical spine. Extremity range of motion exercises will be conducted while maintaining a stable spine at the specific positions. Also, cervical isometric exercises (five hierarchical levels) will be carried out directly forward, obliquely, toward right and left, and directly backward by maintaining a stable spine with elastic resistive bands. Finally, exercises also included functional training with elastic resistance and exercise balls on unstable surfaces (eight hierarchical levels). The criteria to progress in each exercise domain (bracing, isometric exercises or functional training) will be sustain the contraction for 10 seconds, 10 times.
Active Comparator: Orofacial and neck exercises
A protocol of neck motor control protocol will be adopted in our study. The exercises will be administered during six weeks, twice a week. One session will run in the outpatient clinic and the other will be home based. Half of the sessions will be comprised of orofacial strategies and the other half neck motor control exercises. Each exercise and technique will be administered 10 times for 10 seconds.
A protocol of Orofacial Exercises and Manual Therapy will be adopted in the present study. The manual therapy techniques will be: Intraoral temporalis release, Intraoral medial and lateral pterygoid (origin) technique and Intraoral sphenopalatine ganglion technique.
Two mandibular exercises: Mandibular body-condylar cross-pressure chewing technique and Post-isometric relaxation stretches-laterotrusion and opening. Each exercise will be executed 10 times per session for 10 seconds.
A protocol of neck motor control protocol will be adopted in our study. The exercises included bracing exercises (six hierarchical levels) in neurodevelopment stages for the cervical spine. Extremity range of motion exercises will be conducted while maintaining a stable spine at the specific positions. Also, cervical isometric exercises (five hierarchical levels) will be carried out directly forward, obliquely, toward right and left, and directly backward by maintaining a stable spine with elastic resistive bands. Finally, exercises also included functional training with elastic resistance and exercise balls on unstable surfaces (eight hierarchical levels). The criteria to progress in each exercise domain (bracing, isometric exercises or functional training) will be sustain the contraction for 10 seconds, 10 times.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Pain intensity
Time Frame: Immediately after, one- and three-month follow-up
The Numerical Pain Rating Scale will be used to assess pain intensity in this trial and consists in a sequence of numbers from 0 to 10, in which 0 represents "no pain" and 10 represents "worst pain imaginable".
Immediately after, one- and three-month follow-up
Change in Orofacial Pain related Disability
Time Frame: Immediately after, one- and three-month follow-up
The Craniofacial Pain and Disability Inventory (CF-PDI) is a self-administered questionnaire that measures the outcomes of pain and disability related to craniofacial pain and demonstrated a good structure, internal consistency, reproducibility, and construct validity. Also, the Brazilian Portuguese version showed acceptable psychometric measurements. It consists of 21 items, with a score ranging from 0 to 63 points. Each question is scored on 4-point ordinal scale, ranging from 0 to 3. A higher score reflects higher disability levels.
Immediately after, one- and three-month follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ)
Time Frame: Immediately after, one- and three-month follow-up
Study participants will be evaluated on self-efficacy related to chronic pain, which can be defined as an individual's confidence he/she can successfully produce desirable results related to living with chronic pain. The PSEQ has 10 items which are rated on a 7-point ordinal scale (ranging from 0: "not at all confident" to 6: "completely confident"). It was adapted and validated to Brazilian Portuguese (Sarda et al, 2007). Previous research showed an effect on self-efficacy using a PNE intervention based on metaphors compared to an intervention using cognitive-behavioral concepts.
Immediately after, one- and three-month follow-up
Change in Kinesiophobia
Time Frame: Immediately after, one- and three-month follow-up
The Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia for Temporomandibular Disorders (TSK/TMD) is self-report questionnaire that assesses the fear of movement. In this study, the TSK-TMD with 12 items validated in Brazilian Portuguese was used and showed acceptable psychometric measurements. Each item is scored on a 4-point ordinal scale, ranging from 'strongly disagree' (score = 1) to 'strongly agree' (score = 4). Ratings are summed to yield a total score. Higher scores reflect a greater fear of movement (12-48 points).
Immediately after, one- and three-month follow-up
Change in Global Perceived Improvement
Time Frame: Immediately after, one- and three-month follow-up
The global perceived effect (GPE) used for this trial is an 11-point scale that ranges from -5 ("vastly worse") through 0 ("no change") to +5 ("completely recovered") and participants are asked: "Compared to when this episode first started, how would you describe your back these days?". A higher score indicates higher perception of recovery from the condition.
Immediately after, one- and three-month follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Thais Chaves, PhD, University of Sao Paulo

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 10, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 30, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 21, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 23, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

April 24, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 1, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 30, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Temporomandibular Disorders

Clinical Trials on Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE)

3
Subscribe