Sinemet for Spasticity and Function in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Primary Lateral Sclerosis (ALS and PLS)

Sinemet in ALS and PLS

Motivated by the success of dopaminergic drugs in treating rigidity associated with Parkinson's disease, some neurologists have used carbidopa-levodopa (Sinemet) to attempt to improve spasticity in ALS and PLS patients. However, data on the efficacy of carbidopa/levodopa is limited. Given the limited data and potential to improve the quality of life of these patients, the effectiveness of carbidopa-levodopa in ALS and PLS patients with severe spasticity should be studied. The investigators hypothesis is that administration of carbidopa-levodopa will improve spasticity in ALS and PLS patients.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

15

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Washington University School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of ALS or PLS
  • Age greater than 18 years
  • Clinically significant spasticity.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals currently taking carbidopa-levodopa or with known hypersensitivity of any component of carbidopa-levodopa
  • Narrow-angle glaucoma
  • Current use of a non-selective monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI)
  • History of malignant melanoma or suspicious skin lesions
  • History of depression, suicidal ideation, or psychosis
  • History of myocardial infarction, ventricular arrhythmia, or severe cardiopulmonary disease
  • Uncontrolled hypertension
  • Asthma
  • Renal disease
  • Hepatic disease
  • Endocrine disease
  • History of peptic ulcer
  • Pregnant and/or breastfeeding
  • Current participation in another interventional study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: carbidopa-levodopa
Each tablet of carbidopa-levodopa in this study will be equivalent to half of a standard carbidopa-levodopa 25/100mg tablet. Participants will take one tablet three times a day for the first week of the study period, increasing to two tablets three times a day for the remainder of the study period.
Motivated by the success of dopaminergic drugs in treating rigidity associated with Parkinson's disease, some neurologists have used carbidopa-levodopa to attempt to improve spasticity in ALS and PLS patients.
Other Names:
  • Sinemet
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Participants will take one placebo tablet three times a day for the first week of the study period, increasing to two tablets three times a day for the remainder of the study period.
Placebo will be given to maintain blinding of participants and study team.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analog Scale - Change of spasticity severity from baseline with treatment and placebo
Time Frame: Weekly from screening to end of study (six weeks)
Numerical rating scale from 0-10, where 0 is no spasticity and 10 is worst possible spasticity
Weekly from screening to end of study (six weeks)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analog Scale - Change of pain severity from baseline with treatment and placebo
Time Frame: Weekly from screening to end of study (six weeks)
Numerical rating scale from 0-10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is worst possible pain
Weekly from screening to end of study (six weeks)
Visual Analog Scale - Change of muscle spasm severity from baseline with treatment and placebo
Time Frame: Weekly from screening to end of study (six weeks)
Numerical rating scale from 0-10, where 0 is no muscle spasm and 10 is worst possible muscle spasm
Weekly from screening to end of study (six weeks)
Strength
Time Frame: At screening, at 3 weeks (following first arm), and at 6 weeks (following second arm)
Medical Research Council scale for muscle strength which grades power on a scale of 0 to 5 in relation to the maximum expected for that muscle, 0 being no movement observed to 5 being muscle contracts normally against full resistance.
At screening, at 3 weeks (following first arm), and at 6 weeks (following second arm)
Spasticity
Time Frame: At screening, at 3 weeks (following first arm), and at 6 weeks (following second arm)
The Ashworth scale measures severity of spasticity on a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 is normal muscle tone and 5 is a rigid limb.
At screening, at 3 weeks (following first arm), and at 6 weeks (following second arm)
Upper extremity function
Time Frame: At screening, at 3 weeks (following first arm), and at 6 weeks (following second arm)
9-hole peg test
At screening, at 3 weeks (following first arm), and at 6 weeks (following second arm)
Lower extremity function:10-meter Walk Test
Time Frame: At screening, at 3 weeks (following first arm), and at 6 weeks (following second arm)
10-meter Walk Test is a performance measure used to assess walking speed in meters per second over a short distance.
At screening, at 3 weeks (following first arm), and at 6 weeks (following second arm)
Lower extremity function: Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test
Time Frame: At screening, at 3 weeks (following first arm), and at 6 weeks (following second arm)
The TUG test measures the time that a person takes to rise from a chair, walk three meters, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down to asses a person's mobility and lower extremity function.
At screening, at 3 weeks (following first arm), and at 6 weeks (following second arm)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Timothy M Miller, MD, PhD, Washington University School of Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 13, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 8, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

July 8, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 10, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 24, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

April 26, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 11, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 8, 2022

Last Verified

July 1, 2022

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Motor Neuron Disease

Clinical Trials on carbidopa-levodopa

Subscribe