Risk Factors for Persistent Postural-Perceptual Dizziness Development (RIPPPDD)

December 21, 2020 updated by: Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust
The primary aim of this study is to determine whether the prevalence of neuroticism, anxiety and body vigilance is higher in patients diagnosed with PPPD compared to those who suffered a vestibular insult but did not develop PPPD and healthy controls. An increased prevalence of one or more of these factors may identify them as risk factors in the development of PPPD. The secondary aim is to understand how PPPD affects quality of life.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The diagnosis persistent postural-perceptual dizziness (PPPD) entered the 11th edition of the World Health Organization's International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11 beta draft) in 2015 following a consensus document on its diagnostic criteria created by the Behavioral Subcommittee of the Committee for the Classification of Vestibular Disorders of the Bárány Society (CCBS) between 2010 and 2014. The ICD-11 describes it as follows: "Persistent non-vertiginous dizziness, unsteadiness, or both lasting three months or more. Symptoms are present most days, often increasing throughout the day, but may wax and wane. Momentary flares may occur spontaneously or with sudden movement. Affected individuals feel worst when upright, exposed to moving or complex visual stimuli, and during active or passive head motion. These situations may not be equally provocative. Typically, the disorder follows occurrences of acute or episodic vestibular or balance-related problems, but may follow non-vestibular insults as well. Symptoms may begin intermittently, and then consolidate. Gradual onset is uncommon." In a previous systematic review of the literature, the authors discuss the pathophysiology and management of PPPD, including certain psychological risk factors. Anxiety has been suggested to play a pivotal role in the maladaptation cycle of PPPD in part by increasing body vigilance and both neuroticism and a pre-existing anxiety disorder have been suggested as predisposing factors for the onset of this maladaptation cycle. Such risk factors may allow the prediction of who might be at risk of developing PPPD after an acute vestibular injury and thus benefit from early treatment.

As PPPD is a relatively new diagnosis, to date there is no study that comprehensively confirms the prevalence of anxiety, neuroticism and/or increased body vigilance in sufferers specifically. It is important to determine this in order to guide further research into treating and potentially preventing its onset.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

39

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Essex
      • Westcliff-on-Sea, Essex, United Kingdom, SS0 0RY
        • Southend Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients who have been given a previous diagnosis of PPPD will be considered as potential cases and screened for inclusion/exclusion criteria. PPPD diagnosis must be based on the CCBS criteria (Table 1). Participants will be identified by a member of the current clinical care team either through clinic notes or in the outpatient clinics.

Description

Inclusion Criteria

  • Must have diagnosis of PPPD based on the CCBS criteria
  • Aged under 18 years old
  • Able to provide informed consent Exclusion Criteria
  • No confirmed/firm diagnosis of PPPD
  • Aged <18 years old
  • Unable to provide informed consent
  • Current clinically significant illness that could confound the study results

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Scores of the Generalised Anxiety & Depression - 7 (GAD-7) questionnaire
Time Frame: 1 year
Average total scores of the GAD-7 will be compared across each study group. Higher scores indicate higher feelings of anxiety and/or depression in that study group. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum is 21.
1 year
Scores of the Big Five Inventory (BFI) questionnaire
Time Frame: 1 year
Average total scores for each category of the BFI will be compared across each study group. The BFI measures five personality areas: Extraversion, Aggreableness, Conscientiousness, Neuroticism, and Openess. Minimum scores for each subcategory is 1 and the maximum is 5. Higher scores indicate a higher propensity for that personality trait.
1 year
Scores from the Body Vigilance Scale (BVS) questionnaire
Time Frame: 1 year
Average scores for each question of the BVS will be compared across each study group. Minimum score is 0, maximum score is 10. Higher scores indicate higher body vigilance towards bodily sensations.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Scores from the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) questionnaire
Time Frame: 1 year
Average total scores for the DHI will be compared across each study group. Minimum score is 0, maximum is 50, higher scores indicate more symptoms of dizziness in day to day life.
1 year
Scores from the Vertigo Symptom Scale (VSS) questionnaire
Time Frame: 1 year
Average total scores for the VSS will be compared across each study group. Minimum score is 0, maximum is 60. Higher scores indicate a higher severity of symptoms caused by vertigo.
1 year
Scores from the Brief Dizziness Perception Questionnaire (DPQ)
Time Frame: 1 year
Average scores from each question of the DPQ will be measure across each study group. Minimum score is 0, maximum is 10. Higher scores indicate an individual is more affected/more concerned etc regarding their dizziness.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Aaron Trinidade, MBBS, CI
  • Study Director: Bhaskar Dasgupta, MD, R&D Director

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 9, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 9, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 26, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

April 29, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 22, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 21, 2020

Last Verified

December 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dizziness

3
Subscribe