Enhancement of Hippocampal Plasticity Using Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

April 8, 2026 updated by: University of Arizona

The ultimate goal of this study is to develop non-invasive, painless repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) protocols to prevent cognitive decline in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and cognitively normal individuals at high risk of developing Alzheimer's disease (AD). Currently, 1 in 9 adults over the age of 65 have AD, which currently totals more than 5 million Americans and this number is expected to rise as high as 16 million by 2050.

MCI is a clinical syndrome that represents the gray area between healthy aging and dementia. Those with amnestic MCI (aMCI) have memory problems more severe than normal for their age and education, but their symptoms are not as severe as those of people with AD. Patients with aMCI are at high risk for AD. Notably, roughly half of those with MCI will continue to progress and convert to clinical dementia within 3 years. Alternatively, it is also worthwhile to study cognitively healthy older adults who carry genes that may increase the risk of AD. The frequency of the human APOE gene ε4 allele increases in patients with AD and the ε4 allele is also associated with an earlier age of disease onset.

Currently, there are no known therapies that can effectively modify the progression and hallmark symptoms of AD. Therefore, it is crucial to provide an early intervention in patients with aMCI to delay or prevent the progression to AD.

More specifically, this project has two specific aims:

  1. To plan personalized non-invasive brain stimulation location by brain Imaging with Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)
  2. To identify potential personalized cognitive enhancement strategy (such as dosage or patterns) of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) in MCI.

Techniques to artificially and precisely stimulate brain tissue are increasingly recognized as valuable tools both in clinical practice and in cognitive neuroscience studies among healthy individuals and people with clinical conditions. With these practices, researchers can safely stimulate specific regions of the brain to explore causal relationships that comprise the brain's circuitry and modulate behavior.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

In total, 60 participants (50-85 years old) with MCI will be recruited to participate in this trial.

Participants will be asked to receive 30 intervention sessions for three different protocols (10 sessions for each). Before and after the interventions, MRI and Cognitive tasks will be utilized again as the outcome measurements. There is a one-month interval between each protocol. Each intervention will be around half hour to an hour and each outcome measurement will take another two hours.

Each block includes:

  • MRI+ Memory pre-assessment (2 hours/session)
  • TMS * 10 (10 sessions; 0.5 hours/session)
  • MRI+ Memory post-assessment (2 hours/session) Participants will experience each of the three TMS protocols. The total time commitment across these sessions will be approximately 27 hours.

There will be another 2 testing sessions to evaluate intervention effects. They will be scheduled at the beginning, and 1 month after the end of the intervention sessions. All sessions will take place in the Biosciences Research Laboratories (BSLR) Building (1230 N. Cherry Ave., Tucson, AZ 85721). The schematic below outlines the components of the sessions.

The investigators will acquire the following data during components for primary outcome measures and secondary measures.

1) Brain imaging data 2) Neuropsychological data and demographic data 3) Cognitive tasks 4) Biological sample

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

97

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85719
        • Bioscience Research Laboratory

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI Group)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 50-85 years
  • MCI clinical criteria: (a) typical comprehensive criteria (at least one cognitive test <= -1.5 SD), or (b) Jak/Bondi criteria (2 tests within the same domain <= -1SD or 3 tests total <= -1SD)
  • Right handed
  • English speaking
  • Able to attend daily intervention (Monday-Friday) for 4 weeks
  • Not enrolled in another interventional study within 6 months prior to beginning this study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindications to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
  • Other neurological disorders (e.g. stroke, head injuries, or multiple sclerosis)
  • Current cancer treatment or other medical problems that might independently affect cognitive function

Cognitively Normal Individuals:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 50-85 years
  • Right handed
  • English speaking
  • Able to attend daily intervention (Monday-Friday) for 4 weeks
  • Not enrolled in another interventional study within 6 months prior to beginning this study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindications to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
  • Other neurological disorders (e.g. stroke, head injuries, or multiple sclerosis)
  • Current cancer treatment or other medical problems that might independently affect cognitive function
  • No dementia or impaired cognitive functioning, assessed using the NACC battery.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Excitatory TBS
TMS is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique. The primary aim of the study will be to verify the deliverability of the TMS effect on the hippocampus and determine which stimulation protocol is more beneficial to each participant.
Other Names:
  • Theta Burst Stimulation (TBS)
Experimental: Inhibitory TBS
TMS is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique. The primary aim of the study will be to verify the deliverability of the TMS effect on the hippocampus and determine which stimulation protocol is more beneficial to each participant.
Other Names:
  • Theta Burst Stimulation (TBS)
Placebo Comparator: Sham TBS
TMS is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique. The primary aim of the study will be to verify the deliverability of the TMS effect on the hippocampus and determine which stimulation protocol is more beneficial to each participant.
Other Names:
  • Theta Burst Stimulation (TBS)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Brain imaging data
Time Frame: Baseline
The investigators will acquire MRI images to measure structural and functional connectivity, respectively.
Baseline
Correction rate in memory association recall
Time Frame: Baseline
Memory tasks will be implemented and measure the correct rate to assess memory function.
Baseline
NACC Neuropsychological batteries
Time Frame: Baseline
The investigators will use Neuropsychological batteries, which would calculate the Z-score, for measuring cognitions. With Z-score, the investigators can classify participants into MCI or non-MCI group.
Baseline
Specimen sample
Time Frame: 1 day (Only once in the beginning phase)
A specimen for DNA will be collected and determine whether participants have APOE genotype.
1 day (Only once in the beginning phase)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Brain imaging data
Time Frame: 2 weeks after the intervention phase begin
The investigators will acquire MRI images to measure structural and functional connectivity, respectively.
2 weeks after the intervention phase begin
Correction rate in memory association recall
Time Frame: 2 weeks after the intervention phase begin
Memory tasks will be implemented and measure the correct rate to assess memory function.
2 weeks after the intervention phase begin

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Brain imaging data
Time Frame: an average of 1 month
The investigators will acquire MRI images to measure structural and functional connectivity, respectively.
an average of 1 month
Brain imaging data
Time Frame: 3 months after the intervention phase complete
The investigators will acquire MRI images to measure structural and functional connectivity, respectively.
3 months after the intervention phase complete
NACC Neuropsychological batteries
Time Frame: an average of 1 month
The investigators will use Neuropsychological batteries, which would calculate the Z-score, for measuring cognitions function. With Z-score, the investigators can classify participants into MCI or non-MCI group.
an average of 1 month
NACC Neuropsychological batteries
Time Frame: 3 months after the intervention phase complete
The investigators will use Neuropsychological batteries, which would calculate the Z-score, for measuring cognitions. With Z-score, the investigators can classify participants into MCI or non-MCI group.
3 months after the intervention phase complete
Correction rate in memory association recall
Time Frame: an average of 1 month
Memory tasks will be implemented and measure the correct rate to assess memory function.
an average of 1 month
Correction rate in memory association recall
Time Frame: 3 months after the intervention phase complete
Memory tasks will be implemented and measure the correct rate to assess memory function.
3 months after the intervention phase complete

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ying-hui Chou, ScD, University of Arizona

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 21, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 24, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

September 24, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 14, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 23, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

May 24, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 13, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 8, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 1812171968
  • R01AG062543 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mild Cognitive Impairment

Clinical Trials on TBS

Subscribe