Can Epinephrine Coated Syringe for Subcutaneous Immunotherapy (SCIT) Reduce Large Local Reaction?

February 19, 2020 updated by: Orathai Piboonpocanun, Mahidol University
Allergen immunotherapy is effective in the management of allergic asthma, allergic rhinitis/conjunctivitis, and stinging insect hypersensitivity. The most common side effect of subcutaneous allergen specific immunotherapy (SCIT) is local reactions (LR). Although some studies indicated that LR did not predict systemic reaction (SR), patients with higher frequency of large local reaction (LLR) were reported to have higher risk for SR. Epinephrine may decrease LLR due to its vasoconstrictive effect . The objective of this study was to compare the size of LLR in patients receiving SCIT with epinephrine or normal saline coated syringe. The patients who complained of frequent LLR despite pre-medication and local treatment were recruited.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is an immune mediated treatment which modifies T helper (Th) 2-directed response through the interplay between regulatory T and B cells, blocking IgG4 antibodies and tissue effector-mediated mechanisms. Aeroallergen immunotherapy is recommended for patients with allergic rhinitis, allergic conjunctivitis or allergic asthma whose symptoms were not adequately controlled by antigen avoidance and pharmacotherapy. AIT could reduce symptoms and medication usage in respiratory allergy. In children, AIT prevented the progression from allergic rhinitis to asthma and prevented new onset of allergen sensitization in monosensitized patients. The administration of allergen by subcutaneous injection (SCIT) is a common practice among allergists.

The benefits of SCIT must be weighed against the risks of side effects which can be mild or life threatening. Adverse allergic reactions to SCIT were classified as either local (LR) or systemic reactions (SR).6 Large local reactions (LLR) are defined as erythema and/or swelling (> 25 mm) at the site of injection. The timing of adverse reactions were categorized into immediate (occurring within 30 min) and late reactions (occurring > 30 min after injection). LR associated with SCIT ranged from 26-72% of patients and 0.7-4% of injections. SR were reported to occurred in 3.7% of patients and 0.3% of injection. Recent prospective study in pediatric patients who received SCIT showed immediate LR in 54.6%, delayed LR in 56.1%, immediate SR in 2.2% and delayed SR in 7.4% of the patients. Severe SR were seen in 0.03% of all treatments which appeared within 30 minutes after the injections. The author concluded that children had similar rates of LR compared to adult patients but had lower rates of severe SR.

Several studies indicated that individual LR did not predict subsequent SR. The rate of SR were not change despite the dose adjustment after a LR. However, patients with greater frequency of LLR might be at an increased risk for future SR. Recognizing the significance of frequent LLRs is important for designing safer protocols for successful SCIT.

In the Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, we performed SCIT in approximately 100 patients and 2000 injections per year. The LR associated SCIT were complained in 75% of the patients. Of the patients who experienced LR, 80% had LR more than 25 mm which was considered LLR.

Many strategies to prevent or minimize LR were reported. Oral antihistamines, leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA) or anti-IgE could reduce LR during the built-up phase. Cold compression or topical steroid were used to reduce the LR without any strong evidence. To our knowledge, the benefit of epinephrine coated syringe prior to drawing the allergen extract for SCIT in patients with frequent LLR has never been explored in any controlled trial.

The objective of this study is to compare the size of LR in patients with frequent LLR who receive SCIT by coating syringe with epinephrine or placebo prior to drawing allergen extract.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

17

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bangkok, Thailand, 10700
        • Orathai Piboonpocanun

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 years to 40 years (ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients older than 6 years old who received SCIT at Pediatrics allergy departments at Siriraj hospital
  • Patients who develops larges local reactions(mean wheal diameter > 25 mm.) during SCIT.
  • Patients who received SCIT in maintenance phase.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who develops systemic reactions (more than grade 1) during SCIT.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: QUADRUPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Coated syringe with epinephrine
Epinephrine was coated syinge before drawing the allergen to filled in.
epinephreine or normal saline coated syringe before drawing allergen for injection.
Other Names:
  • Adrenaline or normal saline
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: placebo
Normal saline was coated syinge before drawing the allergen to filled in.
epinephreine or normal saline coated syringe before drawing allergen for injection.
Other Names:
  • Adrenaline or normal saline

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Epinephrine coated syringe for SCIT changed sized of large local reactions compared with placebo
Time Frame: 30 minutes, 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours
We measured the sized of local reactions after injected SCIT coated with epinephrine or placebo for 30 minutes at clinic then 2 hours, 4 hours and 6 hours at home.
30 minutes, 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Epinephrine coated syringe for SCIT changed systemic reactions compared with placebo.
Time Frame: 30 minutes, 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours
We measured the systemic reactions after injected SCIT coated with epinephrine or placebo for 30 minutes at clinic then 2 hours, 4 hours and 6 hours at home.
30 minutes, 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Orathai Piboonpocanun, MD, Siriraj Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

October 24, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

August 25, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 22, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 23, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

May 24, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 20, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 19, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Injection Reactions Site

Clinical Trials on Epinephrine or normal saline

3
Subscribe