Danish National Randomized Study on Early Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis (DANAVR)

September 9, 2020 updated by: Jordi Dahl, Odense University Hospital
The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of early surgery in patients with asymptomatic severe aortic valve stenosis with signs of subclinical LV dysfunction despite preserved LVEF, with a watchfull waiting approach.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Since the seminal paper by Ross and Braunwald, the development of symptoms has been regarded as one of the most important precursors of a poor outcome in aortic stenosis (AS), and is today half a century later, still the leading reason for referral for aortic valve replacement (AVR). The development of symptoms is however often preceded by structural changes in the left ventricle (LV).These changes including concentric remodeling and LV hypertrophy have been regarded as compensative measures to adapt the LV to increased ventricular afterload. Although LV hypertrophy may preserve wall-stress in the normal range and increase contractility allowing the preservation of stroke volume, this occurs at the expense of increased filling pressures. Diastolic dysfunction with increased filling pressure lead to left atrial (LA) dilatation and significantly contributes to the development of symptoms.

Despite successful surgery, AS patients have increased long-term mortality and morbidity compared to the general population, and the outcome is largely determined by the degree of preoperative structural LV and LA alterations. This has led to the theory that AVR prior to the development of symptoms could improve outcome, a view supported by prospective and retrospective studies.These studies were however small, with some important limitations. In addition, there has been a concern that operative risk and prosthetic valve related long-term morbidity and mortality does not justify surgery on every asymptomatic patient with severe AS. Numerous studies have suggested that markers of LV structure and function, particularly LA volume index,E/e' and brain natriuretic peptides (BNP) all reflecting LV filling pressures may identify patients with benefit of early AVR. Accordingly, the most recent European guideline for management of valvular disease has implemented BNP as a class IIa recommendation for AVR in asymptomatic AS patients,although no randomized studies have demonstrated that early surgery based on these markers improve prognosis.

The purpose of this study is thus to evaluate if early AVR in patients with signs of elevated LV filling pressuresmay improve long-term outcome in patients with asymptomatic severe AS, compared to conventional symptom-guided surgery.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

1700

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Fyn
      • Odense, Fyn, Denmark, 5000
        • Recruiting
        • Odense University Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 83 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Severe AS defined as

    1. aortic valve area (AVA) ≤1 cm2, AND
    2. Transvalvular maximum velocity (Vmax) ≥3.5 m/s AND
    3. AS severity evaluated severe by a heart valve team conference. In cases where severity is not unambiguous an integrative approach will be utilized combining echocardiographic markers of valve severity and LV function, and if necessary aortic valve calcification estimated by non-contrast CT.

      2. Considered to be asymptomatic (estimated by a consultant in cardiology) 3. Considered to be candidate for AVR (transcatheter AVR/surgical AVR) 4. Sign of increased LV filling pressures18 or reduced longitudinal LV systolic function

    1. Left atrial volume index (LAVi) > 34 ml/m2; OR
    2. ratio of early diastolic peak mitral inflow velocity (E) to early mitral annulus diastolic velocity (e') ratio E/e'avg>13; OR
    3. Threefold elevation in NT-proBNP compared to the upper expected age and gender value. OR
    4. GLS>-15 5. Age ≥18 years 6. Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. LVEF<50%
  2. Very severe AS defined as Vmax>5 m/s.
  3. Concomitant severe valvular disease other than AS
  4. Previous valvular surgery
  5. Estimated glomerular filtration rate<30 ml/min/m2
  6. Dementia
  7. Women of childbearing potential
  8. Inability to provide informed consent
  9. Age>85 years.
  10. Supravalvular or subvalvular AS

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Early intervention
Patients will undergo aortic valve replacement immediately
Open heart surgery or transcatheter surgery
No Intervention: Watchfull waiting
Patients will be followed and treated as recommended by guidelines.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
all-cause mortality
Time Frame: After 379 events (approx 5 years)
All-cause mortality assessed by Danish patient records
After 379 events (approx 5 years)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Combined endpoint
Time Frame: After 379 events (approx 5 years)
All-cause mortality + hospitalization due to heart failure and stroke
After 379 events (approx 5 years)
all-cause mortality in patients with low-gradient AS
Time Frame: After 379 events (approx 5 years)
All-cause mortality in patients with meangradient <40 mmHg
After 379 events (approx 5 years)
Combined endpoint in low-gradient AS
Time Frame: After 379 events (approx 5 years)
All-cause mortality + hospitalization to heart failure and stroke when MG<40 mmHg
After 379 events (approx 5 years)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pericardiocentesis
Time Frame: 5 years
Need of pericariocentesis
5 years
sternal infection
Time Frame: 5 years
hospitalization due to sternal infection
5 years
Persistent renal failure
Time Frame: 5 years
complete loss of renal function exceeding 4 weeks.
5 years
endocarditis
Time Frame: 5-years
hospitalization due to endocarditis
5-years
major bleeding
Time Frame: 5 years
intracerebral bleeding or bleeding resulting in substantial hemodynamic compromise requiring treatment instability
5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2029

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 31, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 31, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

June 3, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 14, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 9, 2020

Last Verified

September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aortic Valve Stenosis

Clinical Trials on Aortic valve replacement

3
Subscribe