Efficacy of Point Of Service Testing in MBC (EPOST MBC)

September 21, 2023 updated by: University of Kansas Medical Center

Efficacy of Point Of Service Testing in Metastatic Breast Cancer

This study will assess the efficacy of an innovative point of service cancer genetics counseling delivery model for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients whom have received a referral for hereditary cancer genetic counseling and testing.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Kansas
      • Kansas City, Kansas, United States, 66205
        • Recruiting
        • The University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood Campus
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Ability of participant OR Legally Authorized Representative (LAR) to understand this study, and participant or LAR willingness to sign a written informed consent.
  • Able to speak and read in the English language.
  • Have a diagnosis of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative metastatic breast cancer.
  • Participants must be enrolled in the parent registry study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Genetic testing for a breast cancer gene (BRCA) BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation completed after 2013 or any BRCA 1 and BRCA2 testing with large rearrangement testing. Prior genetic counseling is allowed.
  • Psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Point of service delivery model
After the informed consent is signed, the participant will watch a standardized video on the principles of genetic testing. At the end of the video, the provider will return to answer any remaining questions. The participant will receive pre- and post- surveys for evaluation of the delivery model.
Participants will receive the pre-test survey, followed by the combined provider/telehealth genetic counseling education video for genetic testing. Afterwards, the participants will receive a post-test and patient satisfaction survey.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of patients/participants that undergo hereditary cancer genetic testing after the telehealth intervention.
Time Frame: 24 months
Defined as the number of participants who opt to undergo hereditary cancer genetic testing as a percentage of the total number of participants enrolled.
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall participant satisfaction
Time Frame: 24 months
Patient satisfaction will be assessed with an adapted Genetic Counseling Satisfaction Scale (aGCSS). Each item is scored from 1- 5, with 1 being strongly disagree and 5 being agree strongly. The scores are added then divided by 5 to give a mean score.
24 months
Clinical decisional conflict score
Time Frame: 24 months
Decisional conflict will be assessed using the Decisional Conflict Scale (Sure Test Version). The 4 items are summed. Scores range from 0 (extremely high decisional conflict) to 4 (no decisional conflict). A score of less than or equal to 3 indicates decisional conflict.
24 months
Overall participant anxiety
Time Frame: 24 months
Participant anxiety will be assessed with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-Anxiety scale). Each item is scored between 0- 3 with a total score between 0- 21 possible. Scores of 0-7 indicates normal; scores of 8-10 indicates borderline abnormal; scores of 11-21 indicates abnormal.
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lauren Nye, MD, University of Kansas

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 11, 2019

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 7, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 7, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

June 12, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 25, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 21, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ePOST

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on Point of service delivery model

Subscribe