Differentiated Service Delivery for Pregnant and Postpartum Women Living With HIV and Their Infants

May 26, 2026 updated by: John Moore Humphrey, Indiana University

Pilot Implementation of Differentiated Service Delivery for Pregnant and Postpartum Women Living With HIV and Their Infants

Differentiated service delivery (DSD) is an evidence-based HIV care and treatment model endorsed by the World Health Organization (WHO) that simplifies HIV services for clients who are clinically stable, improving the quality and efficiency of HIV services. The goal of this implementation-effectiveness pilot study is to evaluate the implementation of a DSD model for pregnant and postpartum women living with HIV and their infants enrolled in care at Huruma Sub-District Hospital in Kenya.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

For pregnant and postpartum women living with HIV (PPHIV) in resource-limited settings, maintaining retention in care and viral suppression, and preventing mother-to-child transmission of HIV, are major implementation challenges in the PMTCT cascade. The goal of this study is to execute and evaluate the implementation of a differentiated service delivery (DSD) model for PMTCT to address these challenges. Specifically, this is a pilot study that will evaluate the implementation of a DSD model for PMTCT in a resource-constrained setting in Kenya. The objective of the DSD model is to improve retention in care and viral suppression for PPHIV. In the DSD approach, clinical services are simplified and adapted to the needs and preferences of clients who are clinically stable, allowing the health system to provide intensified services to the clients who unstable according to their needs. Set clinical criteria will be used to determine which PPHIV and their HIV-exposed children are clinically stable and which are unstable. The DSD model will be implemented at Huruma Sub-District Hospital in western Kenya which offers integrated PMTCT services. Over a period of 12 months, all PPHIV that attend this clinic will be recruited to participate in the DSD model as part of the study. The clinical staff will be responsible for triaging PPHIV and their children as stable or unstable according to the DSD eligibility criteria. The implementation success of the DSD model will be determined using the RE-AIM implementation outcomes. This will involve semi-structured interviews with PPHIV and focus group discussions with PMTCT providers participating in the model. Time-motion analysis and medical record review will also be performed to better understand the implementation process and data needed in preparation a future implementation-effectiveness clinical trial. Commensurate with the scope of this pilot implementation study, participants will not be randomized and there will not be a required minimum sample size. The findings from this study will serve as a foundation for a future, large-scale trial to test the effectiveness and implementation of the DSD model for PMTCT in a resource-limited setting.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

278

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Uasin Gishu County
      • Eldoret, Uasin Gishu County, Kenya, 30100
        • Huruma Sub-District Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Eligibility criteria for providers:

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. ≥18 years of age
  2. Able to understand English or Kiswahili
  3. Works as a clinician, nurse, peer counsellor, social worker, pharmacist, or clinic supervisor involved in providing PMTCT services in the maternal-child health clinic at Huruma Sub-District Hospital

Exclusion Criteria:

none

Eligibility criteria for PPHIV and their infants enrolled prospectively (n=500)*

Inclusion Criteria:

5. Woman is ≥15 years of age 6. Woman is enrolled in maternal-child health services at HSDH 7. Woman is living with HIV 8. Woman is able to understand English or Kiswahili

Exclusion Criteria:

Cognitive impairment that would impair participation in the study

*All infants born to enrolled women during the study will be included.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: DSD arm for stable clients
PPHIV who meet the following criteria will be considered stable clients: on current antiretroviral therapy ≥6 months; no active illness in the past 6 months; retained in care; viral load <50 copies/mL within the last 6 months; age ≥18 years; not primigravida; not high-risk pregnancy. PPHIV meeting these criteria will be offered postnatal clinic visits monthly for the first 6 months followed by visits every 2-3 months, flexible ART refills, and encounters with a clinician at each visit and mentor mother as needed. Clients who do not meet these criteria will continue to receive standard-of-care services which include monthly visits and ART refills during pregnancy through 18 months postpartum.
The differentiated service delivery (DSD) intervention is a clinic-level intervention in which PMTCT clients are differentiated into those who are clinically stable or unstable, with each group offered a different package of services to meet their needs. The DSD model that is being tested in this study is an individual-focused, facility-based model designed for implementation within maternal-child health clinics offering integrated HIV services.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of barriers and facilitators to DSD implementation
Time Frame: One month before implementation of the DSD model in the clinic
The primary outcome for the analysis in Aim 1 (i.e., the pre-implementation phase) of this study will be the number of barriers/facilitators to implementation as elicited through rapid qualitative analysis of the pre-implementation workshop transcripts
One month before implementation of the DSD model in the clinic
Median difference in number of minutes of PMTCT appointment duration before versus after DSD implementation
Time Frame: One month before and 6 months after implementation of the DSD model in the clinic
The outcome of interest in this analysis will be the difference in clinic encounter durations (i.e., encounters with clinicians, mentor mother) between clients who are classified as stable versus unstable according to the DSD eligibility criteria, as measured through direct observation and time-motion analysis before an after DSD implementation
One month before and 6 months after implementation of the DSD model in the clinic
Reach
Time Frame: One month before and 6 months after implementation of the DSD model in the clinic
The proportion of eligible WLH who sign consent to participate in the study among the total number of WLH who attend the PMTCT clinic during the recruitment periods.
One month before and 6 months after implementation of the DSD model in the clinic
Effectiveness, clinic operations level
Time Frame: One month before and during the 12-month period of DSD implementation in the clinic
The primary outcome will be a ≥20% median reduction in the total clinic visit duration for stable clients compared to their pre-implementation baseline.
One month before and during the 12-month period of DSD implementation in the clinic
Proportion of participants who are virally suppressed <50 copies/mL
Time Frame: One month before and during the 12-month period of DSD implementation in the clinic
Maternal viral suppression will be assessed among all WLH after enrollment in the study during pregnancy and from delivery to 6 months postpartum, 7-12, and 13-18 months postpartum.
One month before and during the 12-month period of DSD implementation in the clinic
Proportion of children alive and HIV negative
Time Frame: One month before and during the 12-month period of DSD implementation in the clinic
HIV-free child survival will be assessed among all children of enrolled WLH from birth to 6, 7-12, and 13-18 months postpartum.
One month before and during the 12-month period of DSD implementation in the clinic
Proportion of participants retained in care
Time Frame: One month before and during the 12-month period of DSD implementation in the clinic
Retention in care will be assessed among all WLH after enrollment in the study during pregnancy and from delivery to 6 months postpartum, 7-12, and 13-18 months postpartum.
One month before and during the 12-month period of DSD implementation in the clinic
Proportion of healthcare workers who adopt the DSD model
Time Frame: During the 12-month period of DSD implementation in the clinic
The degree to which the clinic commits to and takes on the DSDp model, determined through rapid qualitative analysis of audit/feedback workshop transcripts conducted during the implementation phase
During the 12-month period of DSD implementation in the clinic
Proportion of PMTCT clients triaged correctly according to the DSD model
Time Frame: During the initial 6 months of DSD implementation in the clinic
The proportion of PMTCT clients triaged correctly according to the DSD model eligibility criteria.
During the initial 6 months of DSD implementation in the clinic
Proportion of providers who perceive the DSD model to be acceptable
Time Frame: During the 12-month period of DSD implementation in the clinic
How satisfactory or agreeable the DSD model is perceived by its end-users, assessed through structured questionnaires administered to patients and providers.
During the 12-month period of DSD implementation in the clinic
Proportion of PMTCT clients triaged correctly according to the DSD model at 12 months
Time Frame: At 12 months following the start of DSD implementation in the clinic
The extent to which a program is part of routine organizational practice, measured through a final time motion analysis and chart review among enrolled participants, conducted over 10 consecutive working days at 6 months at the end of the implementation phase at 12 months
At 12 months following the start of DSD implementation in the clinic
Proportion of patients who perceive the DSD model to be acceptable
Time Frame: During the 12-month period of DSD implementation in the clinic
How satisfactory or agreeable the DSD model is perceived by its end-users, assessed through structured questionnaires administered to patients and providers.
During the 12-month period of DSD implementation in the clinic

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of providers affirming the feasibility of the DSD model
Time Frame: During the 12-month period of DSD implementation in the clinic
The practicality and ease of implementing the DSD model, determined through rapid qualitative analysis of audit/feedback workshop transcripts conducted during the implementation phase
During the 12-month period of DSD implementation in the clinic

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 13, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 5, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

March 5, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 2, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 4, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 8, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 28, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 26, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hiv

Clinical Trials on Differentiated service delivery model

Subscribe