- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06629753
Differentiated Service Delivery for Pregnant and Postpartum Women Living With HIV and Their Infants
Pilot Implementation of Differentiated Service Delivery for Pregnant and Postpartum Women Living With HIV and Their Infants
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Uasin Gishu County
-
Eldoret, Uasin Gishu County, Kenya, 30100
- Huruma Sub-District Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Eligibility criteria for providers:
Inclusion Criteria:
- ≥18 years of age
- Able to understand English or Kiswahili
- Works as a clinician, nurse, peer counsellor, social worker, pharmacist, or clinic supervisor involved in providing PMTCT services in the maternal-child health clinic at Huruma Sub-District Hospital
Exclusion Criteria:
none
Eligibility criteria for PPHIV and their infants enrolled prospectively (n=500)*
Inclusion Criteria:
5. Woman is ≥15 years of age 6. Woman is enrolled in maternal-child health services at HSDH 7. Woman is living with HIV 8. Woman is able to understand English or Kiswahili
Exclusion Criteria:
Cognitive impairment that would impair participation in the study
*All infants born to enrolled women during the study will be included.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: DSD arm for stable clients
PPHIV who meet the following criteria will be considered stable clients: on current antiretroviral therapy ≥6 months; no active illness in the past 6 months; retained in care; viral load <50 copies/mL within the last 6 months; age ≥18 years; not primigravida; not high-risk pregnancy.
PPHIV meeting these criteria will be offered postnatal clinic visits monthly for the first 6 months followed by visits every 2-3 months, flexible ART refills, and encounters with a clinician at each visit and mentor mother as needed.
Clients who do not meet these criteria will continue to receive standard-of-care services which include monthly visits and ART refills during pregnancy through 18 months postpartum.
|
The differentiated service delivery (DSD) intervention is a clinic-level intervention in which PMTCT clients are differentiated into those who are clinically stable or unstable, with each group offered a different package of services to meet their needs.
The DSD model that is being tested in this study is an individual-focused, facility-based model designed for implementation within maternal-child health clinics offering integrated HIV services.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of barriers and facilitators to DSD implementation
Time Frame: One month before implementation of the DSD model in the clinic
|
The primary outcome for the analysis in Aim 1 (i.e., the pre-implementation phase) of this study will be the number of barriers/facilitators to implementation as elicited through rapid qualitative analysis of the pre-implementation workshop transcripts
|
One month before implementation of the DSD model in the clinic
|
|
Median difference in number of minutes of PMTCT appointment duration before versus after DSD implementation
Time Frame: One month before and 6 months after implementation of the DSD model in the clinic
|
The outcome of interest in this analysis will be the difference in clinic encounter durations (i.e., encounters with clinicians, mentor mother) between clients who are classified as stable versus unstable according to the DSD eligibility criteria, as measured through direct observation and time-motion analysis before an after DSD implementation
|
One month before and 6 months after implementation of the DSD model in the clinic
|
|
Reach
Time Frame: One month before and 6 months after implementation of the DSD model in the clinic
|
The proportion of eligible WLH who sign consent to participate in the study among the total number of WLH who attend the PMTCT clinic during the recruitment periods.
|
One month before and 6 months after implementation of the DSD model in the clinic
|
|
Effectiveness, clinic operations level
Time Frame: One month before and during the 12-month period of DSD implementation in the clinic
|
The primary outcome will be a ≥20% median reduction in the total clinic visit duration for stable clients compared to their pre-implementation baseline.
|
One month before and during the 12-month period of DSD implementation in the clinic
|
|
Proportion of participants who are virally suppressed <50 copies/mL
Time Frame: One month before and during the 12-month period of DSD implementation in the clinic
|
Maternal viral suppression will be assessed among all WLH after enrollment in the study during pregnancy and from delivery to 6 months postpartum, 7-12, and 13-18 months postpartum.
|
One month before and during the 12-month period of DSD implementation in the clinic
|
|
Proportion of children alive and HIV negative
Time Frame: One month before and during the 12-month period of DSD implementation in the clinic
|
HIV-free child survival will be assessed among all children of enrolled WLH from birth to 6, 7-12, and 13-18 months postpartum.
|
One month before and during the 12-month period of DSD implementation in the clinic
|
|
Proportion of participants retained in care
Time Frame: One month before and during the 12-month period of DSD implementation in the clinic
|
Retention in care will be assessed among all WLH after enrollment in the study during pregnancy and from delivery to 6 months postpartum, 7-12, and 13-18 months postpartum.
|
One month before and during the 12-month period of DSD implementation in the clinic
|
|
Proportion of healthcare workers who adopt the DSD model
Time Frame: During the 12-month period of DSD implementation in the clinic
|
The degree to which the clinic commits to and takes on the DSDp model, determined through rapid qualitative analysis of audit/feedback workshop transcripts conducted during the implementation phase
|
During the 12-month period of DSD implementation in the clinic
|
|
Proportion of PMTCT clients triaged correctly according to the DSD model
Time Frame: During the initial 6 months of DSD implementation in the clinic
|
The proportion of PMTCT clients triaged correctly according to the DSD model eligibility criteria.
|
During the initial 6 months of DSD implementation in the clinic
|
|
Proportion of providers who perceive the DSD model to be acceptable
Time Frame: During the 12-month period of DSD implementation in the clinic
|
How satisfactory or agreeable the DSD model is perceived by its end-users, assessed through structured questionnaires administered to patients and providers.
|
During the 12-month period of DSD implementation in the clinic
|
|
Proportion of PMTCT clients triaged correctly according to the DSD model at 12 months
Time Frame: At 12 months following the start of DSD implementation in the clinic
|
The extent to which a program is part of routine organizational practice, measured through a final time motion analysis and chart review among enrolled participants, conducted over 10 consecutive working days at 6 months at the end of the implementation phase at 12 months
|
At 12 months following the start of DSD implementation in the clinic
|
|
Proportion of patients who perceive the DSD model to be acceptable
Time Frame: During the 12-month period of DSD implementation in the clinic
|
How satisfactory or agreeable the DSD model is perceived by its end-users, assessed through structured questionnaires administered to patients and providers.
|
During the 12-month period of DSD implementation in the clinic
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of providers affirming the feasibility of the DSD model
Time Frame: During the 12-month period of DSD implementation in the clinic
|
The practicality and ease of implementing the DSD model, determined through rapid qualitative analysis of audit/feedback workshop transcripts conducted during the implementation phase
|
During the 12-month period of DSD implementation in the clinic
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Blood-Borne Infections
- Urogenital Diseases
- Genital Diseases
- Pathologic Processes
- Immune System Diseases
- Infections
- RNA Virus Infections
- Virus Diseases
- Sepsis
- Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome
- Inflammation
- Communicable Diseases
- Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Viral
- Sexually Transmitted Diseases
- Lentivirus Infections
- Retroviridae Infections
- Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes
- Slow Virus Diseases
- HIV Infections
- Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
- Behavior
- Treatment Adherence and Compliance
- Health Behavior
- Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
- Viremia
- Patient Acceptance of Health Care
Other Study ID Numbers
- 23897
- K23HD105495 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Hiv
-
Duke UniversityGilead SciencesRecruitingHIV Prevention | HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis | HIV Prevention Program | HIV Prevention and Care | HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis UseUnited States
-
Federal University of São PauloGilead SciencesCompleted
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamMobile County Health Deparment; Alabama Department of Public HealthRecruitingHIV | HIV Testing | HIV Linkage to Care | HIV TreatmentUnited States
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)RecruitingPrEP | HIV | HIV Prevention | PrEP UptakeUnited States
-
Institute of HIV Research and Innovation Foundation...National Institutes of Health (NIH)RecruitingHIV Prevention | PrEP Adherence | HIV Related StigmaThailand
-
French National Agency for Research on AIDS and...Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS FoundationCompletedPartner HIV Testing | Couple HIV Counseling | Couple Communication | HIV IncidenceCameroon, Dominican Republic, Georgia, India
-
Massachusetts General HospitalNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)RecruitingFeasibility | HIV Prevention | PrEP Uptake | Acceptability | HIV Self-testing | Male Partners of HIV-negative Postpartum WomenSouth Africa
-
ANRS, Emerging Infectious DiseasesHopital Universitaire Robert-Debre; Institut de Recherche pour le Developpement and other collaboratorsUnknownHIV | HIV-uninfected Children | Children Exposed to HIVCameroon
-
University of MinnesotaWithdrawnHIV Infections | HIV/AIDS | Hiv | AIDS | Aids/Hiv Problem | AIDS and InfectionsUnited States
-
University of PennsylvaniaNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH); University of BotswanaRecruitingPregnancy | HIV | Post-partum | HIV Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) AdherenceBotswana
Clinical Trials on Differentiated service delivery model
-
Swiss Tropical & Public Health InstituteCompleted
-
Centre for Infectious Disease Research in ZambiaMinistry of Health, Zambia; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's COVID-19...CompletedFocus of the Study is to Evaluate DSD Models for Both TB Treatment and TPT Usiing Key Performance IndicatorsZambia
-
University of Kansas Medical CenterRecruitingBreast Cancer | Metastatic CancerUnited States
-
Desmond Tutu HIV FoundationKarolinska Institutet; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; ViiV Healthcare and other collaboratorsCompletedHIV Infections | Covid19 | Health Care Utilization | Gender-based ViolenceSouth Africa
-
Institut de Recherche pour le DeveloppementInstitut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France; Queen Mary... and other collaboratorsRecruiting
-
Region ÖstergötlandRegion Jönköping County; Region Örebro CountyRecruitingBehavioral Symptoms | Primary Health Care | Mental DisorderSweden
-
Chulabhorn Cancer CenterChulabhorn Royal AcademyCompleted
-
Western Health, AustraliaMonash University; University of Melbourne; La Trobe UniversityCompleted
-
Duke UniversityPatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; Brown University; University of... and other collaboratorsEnrolling by invitationOsteoporosis | Accidental Falls/Prevention and ControlUnited States
-
Amref Health AfricaCompletedSchistosomiasis Infection | Soil Transmitted Helminth (STH) InfectionsKenya