Building Capacity and Promoting Smoking Cessation in the Community Via "Quit to Win" Contest 2019

August 18, 2020 updated by: Dr. Wang Man-Ping, The University of Hong Kong

Building Capacity and Promoting Smoking Cessation in the Community Via "Quit to Win" Contest 2019: Personalized Cocktail Interventions to Increase Abstinence: a Sequential, Multiple Assignment, Randomized Trial (SMART)

The present study will examine (1) effectiveness of a combined intervention of AWARD advice, active referral, instant messaging and optional cocktail intervention to increase abstinence using a sequential multiple assignment randomised trial (SMART) and (2) explore the use of CBPR model to build capacity and to engage community partners in taking on this important public health issue for sustainability in the community. In addition, a process evaluation will be conducted to assess the effectiveness of the recruitment activity and how it is linked with the overall program outcomes.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Although smoking prevalence is decreasing in Hong Kong, there are still 615,000 daily cigarette smokers in Hong Kong in 2017 and half will be killed by smoking which accounts for over 7,000 deaths per year. Smoking also accounts for a large amount of medical cost, long-term care and productivity loss of US$688 million (0.6% Hong Kong GDP). Smoking is a highly addictive behavior and it is difficult for smokers with strong nicotine dependence to quit without assistance. On the other hand, reaching and helping the many smokers who have no intention to quit is a challenge, because they are unlikely to seek professional help from smoking cessation services.

The Quit and Win programme provides an opportunity to reach and encourage a large group of smokers to make quit attempt and maintain abstinence. The Quit and Win model posits that smokers participating in the contest will have higher motivation to quit with incentives and better social support. Studies have found that such quitting contests or incentive programs appeared to reach a large number of smokers and demonstrated a significantly higher quit rate for the quit and win group than for the control group.

We propose to use adaptive design for the QTW 2019 specifically a two-phase adaptive design, i.e., a sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trial (SMART) design. Optional cocktail cessation supports will be provided based on smokers' smoking status and preference. The supports, including multimedia messages, active referral plus financial incentive, phone counseling, social support and medications, are empirically evidence-supported and most have been used in our previous QTW interventions.

Therefore, the present study will examine (1) effectiveness of a combined intervention of AWARD advice, active referral, instant messaging and optional cocktail intervention to increase abstinence using a SMART design and (2) explore the use of CBPR model to build capacity and to engage community partners in taking on this important public health issue for sustainability in the community. In addition, a process evaluation will be conducted to assess the effectiveness of the recruitment activity and how it is linked with the overall program outcomes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

1200

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • School of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Hong Kong residents aged 18 or above
  • Smoke at least 1 cigarette per day in the past 3-month
  • Able to communicate in Cantonese (including reading Chinese)
  • Exhaled carbon monoxide (CO) 4 ppm or above, assessed by a validated CO Smokerlyzer.
  • Intent to quit / reduce smoking
  • Able to use instant messaging tool (e.g., WhatsApp, WeChat) for communication.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Smokers who have communication barrier (either physically or cognitively)
  • Have participation in other smoking cessation programmes or services

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention Group (subgroup A+B+C)
Personalized instant messaging (PIM) + optional cocktail interventions (OCI) + AWARD advice + referral card + warning leaflet+ COSH booklet
Ask about smoking history, Warn about the high risk of smoking, Advise to quit as soon as possible, Refer to the smoking cessation services, and Do it again (if the smokers refused to set quit date).
Other Names:
  • Ask, Warn, Advise, Refer, Do-it-again

intervention Group participants will receive three months of personalized interaction through IM Apps (e.g. WhatsApp, WeChat). Our counsellors will trigger the conversation and encourage the participants to set a quit day. A total of pre-set 26 messages will be sent with the schedule of once daily for 1 week (the week across the quit date), 3 times a week for 4 weeks (2 weeks each before and after the week with quit date) and once a week for remaining 7 weeks. These messages covered generic information about the benefits of quitting, methods to avoid/ manage craving or withdrawal symptoms, and encouragement to quit and use SC services.

At the end of the initial phase (1-month), complete responders (quitters) will continue to receive PIM (subgroup C). Incomplete responders (smokers) will be randomized to continue PIM (subgroup B) or receive OCI (subgroup A).

For incomplete respondents (subgroup A) randomized to OCI, the available intervention options include multi-media messages, active referral plus financial incentive, phone counseling, family/peer support and medications (NRT). Participants will be guided by cessation counsellors at 1-month follow-up telephone survey to choose any combination of OCI based on their preference. If OCI participants cannot be followed up at 1-month, they will receive multi-media messages by default.
The 2-sided color printed A4 leaflet, which systematically covers the most important messages to motivate smoking cessation
Other Names:
  • Brief leaflet on health warning and smoking cessation
The 3-folded "Smoking Cessation Services" card consists of brief information and highlights of existing smoking cessation services, contact methods, motivation information and strong supporting messages or slogans
Other Names:
  • Smoking Cessation Service Card
A general smoking cessation self-help booklet
Other Names:
  • COSH self-help smoking cessation booklet
Experimental: Control Group (subgroup D+E+F)
Regular instant messaging (RIM) + personalized instant messaging (PIM) + AWARD advice + referral card + warning leaflet+ COSH booklet
Ask about smoking history, Warn about the high risk of smoking, Advise to quit as soon as possible, Refer to the smoking cessation services, and Do it again (if the smokers refused to set quit date).
Other Names:
  • Ask, Warn, Advise, Refer, Do-it-again
The 2-sided color printed A4 leaflet, which systematically covers the most important messages to motivate smoking cessation
Other Names:
  • Brief leaflet on health warning and smoking cessation
The 3-folded "Smoking Cessation Services" card consists of brief information and highlights of existing smoking cessation services, contact methods, motivation information and strong supporting messages or slogans
Other Names:
  • Smoking Cessation Service Card
A general smoking cessation self-help booklet
Other Names:
  • COSH self-help smoking cessation booklet

Participants enrolled in the Control Group will receive regular messages via IM services (e.g. WhatsApp, WeChat) since initial contact and until 3-month after baseline with a tapering schedule: 1) Baseline to 4-week (1-month): 2 times/ week (8 in total); 2) 4-week to 12-week (2- & 3-month): 1 time/week (8 in total).

SC messages will generally include benefits of SC, encouragement on abstinence and use of SC services, tips on avoiding/ handling craving and reminder of participating in telephone follow-up. A reminder to participate in the telephone follow-up will also be sent at 1-, 2-, 3- and 6-month, making up a total of 20 messages.

At the end of the initial phase (1-month), complete responders (quitters) will continue to receive RIM (subgroup F). Incomplete responders (smokers) will be second randomized to continue RIM (subgroup E) or receive PIM (subgroup D). Those who are unable to follow up at 1-month will be considered as nonresponsive to the intervention.

For incomplete responders allocated to PIM (subgroup D), participants will receive the same intervention as the Group A delivered at the initial stage. Participants will receive two months of personalized interaction through IM application. Please refer to Intervention Group "Initial phase: personalized instant messaging (PIM)" for details.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Validated abstinence of PIM + OCI vs. RIM + PIM
Time Frame: 6-month follow-up
PIM + OCI (subgroup A+B+C) vs. RIM + PIM (subgroup D+E+F) on validated abstinence (exhaled CO < 4 ppm and salivary cotinine < 10 ng/ml)
6-month follow-up
Validated abstinence of OCI vs. RIM in incomplete responders
Time Frame: 6-month follow-up
OCI (subgroup A) vs. RIM (subgroup E) in incomplete responders (those who are still smoking at 1-month) on validated abstinence (exhaled CO < 4 ppm and salivary cotinine < 10 ng/ml)
6-month follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Validated abstinence of PIM + OCI vs. RIM + PIM adjusted for potential imbalance of baseline characteristic
Time Frame: 6-month follow-up
PIM + OCI (subgroup A+B+C) vs. RIM + PIM (subgroup D+E+F) on validated abstinence (exhaled CO < 4 ppm and salivary cotinine < 10 ng/ml) adjusted for potential imbalance of baseline characteristic.
6-month follow-up
Validated abstinence of OCI vs. RIM in incomplete responders adjusted for potential imbalance of baseline characteristic
Time Frame: 6-month follow-up
OCI (subgroup A) vs. RIM (subgroup E) in incomplete responders (those who are still smoking at 1-month) on validated abstinence (exhaled CO < 4 ppm and salivary cotinine < 10 ng/ml) adjusted for potential imbalance of baseline characteristic
6-month follow-up
Validated and self-reported abstinence of OCI vs. PIM in incomplete responders
Time Frame: 3- and 6-month follow-up
OCI (subgroup A) vs. PIM (subgroup B) in incomplete responders (those who are still smoking with 1-month) on validated abstinence (exhaled CO < 4 ppm and salivary cotinine < 10 ng/ml) and self-reported abstinence
3- and 6-month follow-up
Validated and self-reported abstinence of PIM vs. RIM in incomplete responders
Time Frame: 3- and 6-month follow-up
PIM (subgroup D) vs. RIM (subgroup E) in incomplete responders (those who are still smoking with 1-month) on validated abstinence (exhaled CO < 4 ppm and salivary cotinine < 10 ng/ml) and self-reported abstinence
3- and 6-month follow-up
Validated and self-reported abstinence of PIM vs. RIM
Time Frame: 3- and 6-month follow-up
PIM (subgroup B+C) vs. RIM (subgroup E+F) on validated abstinence (exhaled CO < 4 ppm and salivary cotinine < 10 ng/ml) and self-reported abstinence
3- and 6-month follow-up
PIM intervention engagement on validated and self-reported abstinence
Time Frame: 3- and 6-month follow-up

Difference between engagement of PIM intervention vs. no engagement of PIM intervention vs. RIM intervention on validated abstinence (exhaled CO < 4 ppm and salivary cotinine < 10 ng/ml) and self-reported abstinence.

PIM intervention include subgroup B+C+D, RIM intervention include subgroup E+F.

3- and 6-month follow-up
OCI intervention engagement on validated and self-reported abstinence
Time Frame: 3- and 6-month follow-up

Difference between engagement of OCI intervention vs. no engagement of OCI intervention vs. engagement of PIM intervention vs. no engagement of PIM intervention vs. RIM intervention on validated abstinence (exhaled CO < 4 ppm and salivary cotinine < 10 ng/ml) and self-reported abstinence.

OCI intervention include subgroup A, PIM intervention include subgroup B+C+D, RIM intervention include subgroup E+F.

3- and 6-month follow-up
Smoking reduction rate change from baseline at 3- and 6-month follow-up
Time Frame: 3- and 6-month follow-up
Rate of smoking reduction by at least half of baseline amount
3- and 6-month follow-up
Smoking cessation service use
Time Frame: 3- and 6-month follow-up
Use of smoking cessation service
3- and 6-month follow-up
Nicotine independence (HSI) on abstinence and intervention engagement
Time Frame: 3- and 6-month follow-up
Subgroup analyses of high nicotine independence vs. low nicotine independence on validated abstinence (exhaled CO < 4 ppm and salivary cotinine < 10 ng/ml) and self-reported abstinence, and intervention engagement (use of PIM and/or OCI intervention)
3- and 6-month follow-up
Intention to quit analyses on abstinence and intervention engagement
Time Frame: 3- and 6-month follow-up
Subgroup analyses of high intention to quit vs. low intention to quit on validated abstinence (exhaled CO < 4 ppm and salivary cotinine < 10 ng/ml) and self-reported abstinence, and intervention engagement (use of OCI intervention and/or PIM intervention and/or RIM intervention).
3- and 6-month follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 21, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 12, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 18, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

June 20, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 20, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 18, 2020

Last Verified

August 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • QTW 2019

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Smoking Cessation

Clinical Trials on AWARD advice

Subscribe