Dutch Version Fear-Avoidance Component Scale (FACS)

September 24, 2023 updated by: Lotte Janssens, Hasselt University

Validation and Reliability of the Dutch Version of the Fear-Avoidance Component Scale (FACS)

Chronic musculoskeletal disorders such as low back and neck pain are responsible for an enormous global burden. Fear-avoidance (FA) can be a predictor for the transition from subacute to chronic low back pain. In patients with neck pain, those who were less fearful about harming their neck, had higher pain tolerance, which might have a positive impact on their level of disability. A new scale, the Fear-Avoidance Component Scale (FACS) was developed by Neblett, Mayer, Hartzell, Williams and Gatchel (2015) to assess FA. It consists of an all-encompassing set of constructs that more effectively deals with all critical issues of the FA concept than current scales do. Current scales have been criticized because of following findings: limited construct validity, little evidence on treatment responsiveness, a lack of evidence-based cut-off scores and items being too narrow or too general. The new scale comprehensively assesses all cognitive, emotional and behavioral components related to the updated version of the FA model by combining items of well-known scales in context of the FA model with items on one's perception of victimization and blame related to an injury. A Dutch version of the FACS is currently lacking. Subsequently, the aim of this study is to investigate different psychometric properties of the generated Dutch version in patients with musculoskeletal disorders.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Hasselt, Belgium, 3590
        • Lotte Janssens

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 78 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion criteria for all patients

  • between 18-80 years old
  • current pain complaint is not surgically treated
  • not being currently treated by a physiotherapist for pain complaint
  • Dutch language is mother tongue
  • At least 6 weeks of pain Exclusion criteria for all patients
  • Pain from a non-musculoskeletal origin (e.g., tumour)
  • neurological disease
  • impaired cognition Inclusion criteria for healthy controls
  • Not being disabled due to MSK pain based on cut-off per disability questionnaire
  • Between 18-80 years old
  • Dutch language is mother tongue

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Patients with musculoskeletal disorders
Patients with either shoulder pain, knee pain, hip pain, low back pain, pelvic pain or neck pain as their primary pain complaint, lasting for 6 weeks or longer
Assessment of disability and behavior (by questionnaires)
Sham Comparator: Healthy controls
Age- and gender-matched healthy controls (without musculoskeletal pain)
Assessment of disability and behavior (by questionnaires)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The fear-avoidance component scale (FACS)
Time Frame: day 0
Questionnaire evaluating fear-avoidance related to pain (for all participants) 20 items range from 0-100
day 0
The fear-avoidance component scale (FACS)
Time Frame: day 7
Questionnaire evaluating fear-avoidance related to pain (for all participants) 20 items range from 0-100
day 7
Disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (DASH) for shoulder pain patients
Time Frame: day 0
Questionnaire evaluating disability (only used in patients with shoulder pain) 30 items Range total score 0-100 5 point-scale
day 0
Disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (DASH) for shoulder pain patients
Time Frame: day 7
Questionnaire evaluating disability (only used in patients with shoulder pain) 30 items Range total score 0-100 5 point-scale
day 7
Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) for hip pain patients
Time Frame: day 0
Questionnaire evaluating disability (only used in patients with hip pain) Subscores per domain 40 items 5 point scale 5 domains: symptoms (5 items), pain (10 items), activities of daily living (17 items), sport and leisure time (4 items), quality of life (4 items)
day 0
Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) for hip pain patients
Time Frame: day 7
Questionnaire evaluating disability (only used in patients with hip pain) Subscores per domain 40 items 5 point scale 5 domains: symptoms (5 items), pain (10 items), activities of daily living (17 items), sport and leisure time (4 items), quality of life (4 items)
day 7
Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) for knee pain patients
Time Frame: day 0
Questionnaire evaluating disability (only used in patients with knee pain) Subscores per domain 42 items 5 domains: pain (9 items), symptoms (7 items), activities of daily life (17 items), sports and leisure (5 items), quality of life (4 items) 5 point Likert scale
day 0
Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) for knee pain patients
Time Frame: day 7
Questionnaire evaluating disability (only used in patients with knee pain) Subscores per domain 42 items 5 domains: pain (9 items), symptoms (7 items), activities of daily life (17 items), sports and leisure (5 items), quality of life (4 items) 5 point Likert scale
day 7
Oswestry Disability Index for patients with low back pain
Time Frame: day 0
Questionnaire evaluating disability (only used in patients with low back pain) 10 items Total score range from 0-100
day 0
Oswestry Disability Index for patients with low back pain
Time Frame: day 7
Questionnaire evaluating disability (only used in patients with low back pain) 10 items Total score range from 0-100
day 7
Neck Disability Index for neck pain patients
Time Frame: day 0
Questionnaire evaluating disability (only used in patients with neck pain) 10 items Total score range from 0-100
day 0
Neck Disability Index for neck pain patients
Time Frame: day 7
Questionnaire evaluating disability (only used in patients with neck pain) 10 items Total score range from 0-100
day 7
Fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire
Time Frame: day 0
3 subscales: physical activity (4 items; 0-30), work (7 items; 0-66) and rest (5 items)
day 0
Fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire
Time Frame: day 7
3 subscales: physical activity (4 items; 0-30), work (7 items; 0-66) and rest (5 items)
day 7
Tampa scale for kinesiophobia
Time Frame: day 0
Questionnaire evaluating kinesiophobia related to pain (for all participants) 17 items total score from 17-68
day 0
Tampa scale for kinesiophobia
Time Frame: day 7
Questionnaire evaluating kinesiophobia related to pain (for all participants) 17 items total score from 17-68
day 7
Pain catastrophizing scale
Time Frame: day 0
Questionnaire evaluating catastrophizing (for all participants) 13 items 5 point Likert Scale Total score 0-52
day 0
Pain catastrophizing scale
Time Frame: day 7
Questionnaire evaluating catastrophizing (for all participants) 13 items 5 point Likert Scale Total score 0-52
day 7
IEQ-Dutch scale for perceived injustice
Time Frame: day 0
Questionnaire evaluating perceived injustice (for all participants) 12 items 5 point Likert-scale Total score range 0-48
day 0
IEQ-Dutch scale for perceived injustice
Time Frame: day 7
Questionnaire evaluating perceived injustice (for all participants) 12 items 5 point Likert-scale Total score range 0-48
day 7
Hospital anxiety and depression scale
Time Frame: day 0
Questionnaire evaluating anxiety and depression (for all participants) 2 subscales: anxiety (7 items) and depression (7 items) Total score 0-21 per subscale
day 0
Hospital anxiety and depression scale
Time Frame: day 7
Questionnaire evaluating anxiety and depression (for all participants) 2 subscales: anxiety (7 items) and depression (7 items) Total score 0-21 per subscale
day 7

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Annick Timmermans, PhD, PT, Hasselt University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 4, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 20, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

June 21, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 26, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 24, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hip Pain Chronic

Clinical Trials on Assessment of disability and behavior (by questionnaires)

3
Subscribe