Effectiveness of Adductor Canal Block Using Liposomal Bupivacaine

November 29, 2023 updated by: Dr. Chan Chi-Wing, The University of Hong Kong

Comparing the Efficacy of Combining Periarticular Local Infiltration of Analgesia and Adductor Canal Block Using Liposomal Bupivacaine and Standard Bupivacaine in Total Knee Arthroplasty - A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

With aging of population, osteoarthritis of knees and hips become major orthopaedic problems in Hong Kong. Osteoarthritis of knees and hips are associated with significant pain problem and functional disability. Total joints replacement is the ultimate surgical procedures to deal with such problems.

However total joints replacement is associated with significant tissue damage and post-operative pain problems, which would affect post-operative recovery and rehabilitation.

The primary aims of total knee replacement are improvement in functional activities and reduce pain due to degenerated knee joints. However, there are around 20-30% of patients would develop significant pain problem despite uncomplicated total knee replacement. It accounts for major post-operative problems and burdens.

Procedure specific analgesic method with multi-model analgesia technique is well-known to be useful in post-operative pain management, which reduces the post-operative pain score. However, despite using of multi-modal analgesic technique, pain after total joint replacement is still the most unsolved issue. It prolongs the recovery period and increases post-operative analgesic consumptions.

Multimodal analgesia, including periarticular local infiltration of analgesia (LIA), regional nerve block, opioid and non-opioid have been shown to be effective in managing postoperative pain.

Periarticular LIA has been shown to be an effective way of pain management. Regional nerve block using femoral nerve block or adductor canal block (ACB) is also a well-established anlagesic technique after total knee replacement. Comparing with femoral nerve block, it involves more sensory blockade so has the advantage of quadriceps sparing, less affecting the post-operative mobilization.

From most recent systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials, it becomes clear that periarticular LIA has better pain control with less opioid consumption than ACB alone. However, duration of a single-dose LIA may not be long enough after total knee replacement. Recent meta-analysis has shown that combined ACB with LIA could significantly reduce pain scores and morphine consumption compared LIA alone after TKA. Standard bupivacaine, levobupivocaine, ropivocaine were used in ACB in these studies. They are local anaesthetic with half-life ranging from 3-6 hours.

With the availability of liposomal bupivacaine (LB), ACB using LB may further prolong the analgesic effect of ACB as the therapeutic levels of bupivacaine, which are below the toxic range and sustained for 72 hours after injection. Therefore, the issue is whether ACB using LB has even longer analgesic effect than plain bupivacaine or ropivacaine. There was only one study directly compared ACB using LB and 0.1% ropivociane infusion. It was shown that LB had significant impact in pain control in the first 36 hours. However, this was a retrospective study and there was difference in delivery of local anaesthetics (single shot injection for liposomal bupivacaine but continuous infusion for ropivacaine).

The primary aim of this study is to investigate whether ACB using liposomal bupivacaine has even longer analgesic effect than standard bupivacaine (SB) and its cost effectiveness. Secondary aims are to evaluate the pharmacokinetic data of standard bupivacaine and liposomal bupivacaine in adductor canal block and pharmacokinetic data of ropivocaine level in LIA.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

90

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ASA I-III
  • Age 18-80 years old
  • Scheduled for elective primary unilateral total knee replacement
  • Chinese patients
  • BMI < 40
  • Able to speak and understand Cantonese
  • Able to provide informed oral and written consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Revision total knee replacement
  • Single stage bilateral total knee replacement
  • Known allergy to opioids, local anaesthetic drugs, paracetamol, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) including COX-2 inhibitors
  • History of chronic pain other than chronic knee pain
  • History of immunosuppression
  • Daily use of glucocorticoids
  • Daily use of strong opioids (morphine, fentanyl, hydromorphone, ketobemidone, methadone, nicomorphine, oxycodone, or meperidine)
  • History of severe heart disease (NYHA 2)
  • Alcohol or drug abuse
  • Impaired renal function, defined as preoperative serum creatinine level over 120 μmol/L
  • Pre-existing neurological or muscular disorders
  • Psychiatric illness or neurologic or psychiatric diseases potentially influencing pain perception
  • Impaired or retarded mental state
  • Difficulties in using patient controlled analgesia (PCA)
  • Pregnancy
  • Local infection
  • On immunosuppresants
  • Patient refusal

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group LB
local infiltration of analgesia (LIA) with adductor canal block (ACB) will be given using 10ml of 1.33% liposomal bupivacaine with 10ml 0.5% standard bupivacaine
LIA with ACB will be given using 10ml of 1.33% liposomal bupivacaine + 10ml 0.5% standard bupivacaine
Active Comparator: group SB
LIA with ACB will be given using 20ml 0.5%standard bupivacaine
LIA with ACB will be given using 20ml 0.5% standard bupivacaine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain assessed by numerical rating scales (NRS) pain scores
Time Frame: at postoperative day 1
NRS pain scores (from 0-10, where 0 is the least satisfaction and 10 most satisfaction) will be recorded during movement and at rest, by NRS (movement) and NRS (rest) respectively
at postoperative day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Range of motion (ROM) of knee
Time Frame: from postoperative day 0 until postoperative day 6
Active and Passive ROM of knee (flexion and extension) will be recorded.
from postoperative day 0 until postoperative day 6
Walking Distance
Time Frame: from postoperative day 0 until postoperative day 6
Walking distance will be measured in meters
from postoperative day 0 until postoperative day 6
Degree of assistance
Time Frame: from postoperative day 0 until postoperative day 6
Patients' ability to walk will be assessed. There are three categories including walking without help, walking with walking frame and being unable to walk
from postoperative day 0 until postoperative day 6
Ability to preform straight leg raising
Time Frame: from postoperative day 0 until postoperative day 6
Patients' ability to preform straight leg raising is recorded after surgery
from postoperative day 0 until postoperative day 6
Plasma level of bupivacaine and ropivacaine.
Time Frame: at before ACB, 1 hour, 2 hours, 4 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, 16 hours, 20 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours, and 72 hours after ACB.
Blood sample would be collected and plasma level of bupivacaine and ropivacaine would be measured using liquid chromatography coupled mass spectrometry.
at before ACB, 1 hour, 2 hours, 4 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, 16 hours, 20 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours, and 72 hours after ACB.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Chi Wing Chan, MBBS, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 26, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 28, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

July 1, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 1, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 29, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain, Postoperative

Clinical Trials on Liposomal bupivacaine

Subscribe