Novel Technique of Pneumatic Posterior Capsulorhexis for Treatment and Prevention of Posterior Capsular Opacification (PCO)

July 2, 2019 updated by: Shaaban Elwan, Minia University

ABSTRACT PURPOSE: To evaluate a new technique of posterior capsulorhexis using air support to treat primary posterior capsular opacification (PCO) during cataract extraction surgery or to prevent post-operative PCO.

SETTING: 1-Ophthalmology department, Faculty of medicine, Minia University, El-Minia, Egypt.

2- Security Forces Hospital, Ophthalmology Department, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

DESIGN: Prospective, randomized case-control comparative study.

Methods: 100 eyes of 100 patients with a mean age of 63.3 years with dens cataract. Fifty of them ( group 1) with primary PCO (discovered during the operations) and fifty (group 2) with clear posterior capsule.

All cases undergone phacoemulsification, posterior capsulorhexis using the air to support the posterior capsule and separate it from the vitreous (the novel technique will be discussed later). Then IOL implantations wear done in the bag between the anterior and posterior capsular rim. Each patient was evaluated for the following:- visual acuity (UCVA and BCVA), intraocular pressure, intra ocular lens stability, visual axis opacification and posterior segment complications as retinal break, retinal detachment or cystoid macular oedema.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Introduction. Posterior capsular opacification (PCO) is one of the common late post-operative complications of phacoemulsification and ECCE. The treatment of PCO by YAG laser capsulotomy usually leads to the famous annoying symptom (musca) and carries the risk of IOP elevation. Moreover, it may lead to the posterior segment complications ( cystoid macular edema, retinal breaks and detachment). There is no reliable treatment for prevention of PCO.

The current available modalities to prevent postoperative PCO are:

  • Some surgical modifications as hydrodissection, repeated nucleus rotation and meticulous polishing of the lens epithelial cells (LECs) from anterior capsular rim and equator. In 1989 David Apple and his group (1) had demonstrated the value of hydrodissection. In 1992, they further emphasized hydrodissection as well as barriers to migration of equatorial cells to the posterior capsule as methods which could reduce PCO (2). In the same year Fine described a technique which he termed 'cortical cleaving hydrodissection', (3) which was designed to break the equatorial adhesions between lens epithelial cells and the capsule, thus increasing the chance of significant clearance of these cells which are the progenitors of PCO. In 2006 they pointed out to the laboratory and clinical evidence that good hydrodissection, coupled with mechanical 'scouring' of LECs from the equator may have beneficial effect on decreasing PCO incidence. (4,5). In a laboratory experiment they found that there were significantly fewer cells remaining in the capsule equator in the group of eyes where the lens had been rotated three times within the bag prior to removal, compared with no such rotation(4).
  • Changes in the IOL design and materials: e.g. The square edge of the optic and acrylic IOL decreases the incidence of postoperative PCO than with PMMA IOLs of similar design.
  • Pharmacological strategies either to kill the residual epithelial cells or to prevent their post operative proliferation. The pharmacological prevention has been largely unsuccessful so far. Moreover, any agent must be toxic to these epithelial cells without being toxic to the corneal endothelium. Few agents have been partially successful without clinical application till now (6).

The incidence of PCO following successful cataract surgery has been falling since the general acceptance of posterior chamber in-the-bag intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. Improvement in lens materials, lens design and technique are well documented to decrease the incidence of postoperative PCO (8, 9). Rotation three times of the hydrodissected nucleus prior to phacoemulsification and a second hydrodissection after nucleus removal are simple and safe maneuvers that statistically improve the results (9). Bimanual irrigation/aspiration may also help.(10) Treatment options for PCO

  • YAG laser posterior capsulotomy
  • Surgical posterior capsulotomy or capsulectomy
  • Primary (Intra-operative)
  • Secondary.

Patients and methods:

Indications of the new technique

  1. Intraoperative PCO in white cataract.
  2. As a primary procedure during cataract extraction to prevent post-operative PCO. Thirty eyes of 100 patients with dens cataract were chosen from the outpatient clinic of the ophthalmology department, Minia University Hospital, El-Minia Egypt. The patient's age ranged from 50-73 years with a mean age of 63.3 years 50 males and 50 females without any local or systemic causes for the cataract. The study group included fifty eyes (group1) with PCO, and fifty eyes (group 2) with clear posterior capsule (discovered intra-operative). All cases were subjected to complete ophthalmic examinations and echographic data registration. All cases undergone Phacoemulsification, posterior capsulorhexis using the air to support the posterior capsule and separate it from the vitreous face. Table (1)

The novel technique:

After complete phacoemulsification of the nucleus and I/A:

  1. Visco-elastic material was injected to make the anterior chamber formed without deepening so that the posterior capsule is not forcibly pushed backward.
  2. The posterior capsule punctured centrally using cysteotome Fig. (1).
  3. Controllable one shot injection of 0.1 ml of sterile air through the posterior capsule puncture which elevate, support and separate the posterior capsule from vitreous face. (Insulin syringe and Helon cannula were used) Fig. (2).
  4. Another visco-elastic injection to the anterior chamber to stretch the posterior capsule and sandwitich it between visco-elastic above and the air below Fig. (3).
  5. Posterior capsulorhexis 4-5 mm is now performed easily using capsulorhexis forceps then foldable IOL was implanted between the anterior and posterior capsular rim .

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Central
      • Riyadh, Central, Saudi Arabia, 11481-3643
        • Security Forces Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

46 years to 69 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Dense mature cataract without any local or systemic causes for the cataract.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any patients did not complete the follow up visits
  • younger patients and children

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Opacified posterior capsule
PCO
Pneumatic Posterior Capsulorhexis using air dose 0.1 ml and Healon dose 0.5 -1.0 ml.
Active Comparator: Clear posterior capsule
CPC
Pneumatic Posterior Capsulorhexis using air dose 0.1 ml and Healon dose 0.5 -1.0 ml.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual acuity measured using snellen chart projector
Time Frame: one year
visual acuity (UCVA and BCVA) measured in decimal values
one year
IOP measured in numerical values
Time Frame: one year
Intra-ocular pressure measured by Tono pen
one year
IOL stability
Time Frame: one year
Intraocular Lens stability seen by slit lamb examination
one year
Visual Axis Opacification
Time Frame: 0ne year
Visual Axis Opacification seen by slit lamb examination
0ne year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
posterior segment complications
Time Frame: 18 months
posterior segment complications as retinal break, retinal detachment or cystoid macular oedema.
18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Ahmed M Eid, MD, Minia University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

June 25, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 29, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 2, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

July 5, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 5, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 2, 2019

Last Verified

July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Minia University

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Posterior Capsule Opacification

Clinical Trials on Pneumatic Posterior Capsulorhexis

Subscribe