Vasculaire Compression System Increases Flow Velocity in the Femoral Vein

Evaluation of the Effect of the Vasculaire Compression System on Flow Velocity in the Femoral Vein

The objective of this clinical study was to demonstrate the performance of the Vasculaire Compression System to increase femoral venous peak velocity (PFV) in healthy subjects. This study was a single-arm, open label, prospective, single-center clinical study.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Venous Thrombosis
• Intervention / Treatment: Device: Pneumatic Compression therapy

Detailed Description

Venous thromboembolism, e.g. deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism, occurs in approximately one in 1,000 persons in the United States annually and results in more than 250,000 hospital admissions annually in the United States. Intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC), which prevents stasis in the lower limbs, has been shown to be a safe and effective method of prophylaxis of DVT in studies comparing the incidence of DVT and pulmonary embolism with and without IPC. IPC devices decrease venous stasis by augmenting the venous blood flow in the lower extremities. Studies have suggested that an important indicator of the effectiveness of an IPC device in preventing DVT is the peak femoral venous velocity augmentation during the compression phase as compared with the decompression phase of the device.

IPC devices produced in the early 1980s and 1990s were cumbersome, noisy and required external power sources, making them suitable only for non-ambulatory patients. Furthermore, these devices have been associated with poor compliance in trauma patients in a hospital setting, and the poor compliance was associated with a higher rate of DVT.

The aim of this study is to test the hemodynamic performance of a new portable IPC device, the Venous Health Systems' Vasculaire Compression System. This new device is designed to provide patient comfort and convenience of use while providing similar improvement in venous blood flow when compared with existing IPC devices.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 33
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • California
    • Portola Valley, California, United States, 94028
      • Venous Health System, Inc.

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Male or female subjects between 18 years old and 65 years old;
• Capable of and willing to lay supine for approximately one hour;
• Subjects must provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

• History of Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) or suspected DVT;
• History of vascular disease, e.g. coronary or peripheral artery disease;
• History of stroke;
• History of pulmonary edema;
• History of congestive heart failure;
• Diabetes mellitus;
• Past or present smoker;
• Surgery or trauma to the right leg within the last six months;
• Open ulcers or wounds on the right leg;
• Pregnant or breastfeeding.

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Prevention
• Allocation: N/A
• Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Change in Femoral Venous Peak Flow Velocity Compared to Resting Baseline	The femoral vein in the mid-thigh area was located and the femoral venous Peak Flow Velocity (PFV)was measured using duplex ultrasound during the compression phase of treatment. PFV is the maximum velocity of blood flow achieved when the foot and calf compression is applied. The PFV was then compared to the subject's own baseline PFV using a paired t-test.	3 measurements/10 min. therapy

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
PFV Percent Augmentation	Peak Flow Velocity (PFV) from the compression phase subtracted from the PFV from the decompression phase divided by the PFV from the decompression phase expressed as the percent augmentation.	3 measurements/10 minute therapy
Subject Comfort	Subject comfort was measured on a scale 1 to 5 (1=negative response; 5=positive response) during the sleeve installation, during use, and completion.	10 min therapy

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Venous Health Systems, Inc.
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Thomas J Fogarty, M.D., founder

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start: August 1, 2010
• Primary Completion (Actual): September 1, 2010
• Study Completion (Actual): September 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: November 10, 2010
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: November 10, 2010
• First Posted (Estimate): November 15, 2010

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Estimate): March 3, 2011
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: March 2, 2011
• Last Verified: March 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Deep Vein Thrombosis; Effects of compression therapy; Peak Flow Velocity
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Cardiovascular Diseases; Vascular Diseases; Embolism and Thrombosis; Thrombosis; Venous Thrombosis
• Other Study ID Numbers: VenousHealth-001