Video Game for Home-based Rehabilitation for Children With Hemiplegia

April 21, 2023 updated by: Elaine Biddiss, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital

Evaluation of a Novel Video Game for Home-based Rehabilitation for Children With Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy.

This study evaluates the feasibility of a low-cost, movement tracking video game (Bootle Blast) to 1) sustain engagement in children with cerebral palsy (CP) during a 12-week intervention; and 2) generate changes in upper limb functional motor outcomes following the intervention.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Children with Cerebral Palsy (CP) can benefit from home-based practice of therapy exercises. However, sustaining engagement in home-based therapy is challenging. Bootle Blast is a low-cost video game that uses the Microsoft Kinect sensor to track upper limb movements and interactions with real-life objects (e.g. musical instruments, building blocks). To play Bootle Blast, the child needs to use the hemiplegic arm/hand to play unilateral game activities, and highly involve it in bilateral activities.

This study will answer our research questions: 1) to what extent can children achieve a weekly play-time goal (PTG) over a 12-week intervention (adherence) when the PTG is family identified? 2) to what extent can the use of Bootle Blast lead to improvements in UL motor function? and 3) what are the participant's experiences of using BB for home rehabilitation?

As measures of feasibility we hypothesize that 1a) 75% of children will achieve their weekly play time goal and complete the 12-week intervention and 2) 75% children who achieve their weekly play time goal will improve in one or more UL motor outcome measures.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

4

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M4G 1R8
        • Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

4 years to 13 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • diagnosis of hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy, Gross Motor Function Classification System and Manual Abilities Classification System Levels I to III, able to co-operate, understand and follow simple instructions for gameplay, live within 30 km of the Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, having a caregiver willing to participate.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • currently receiving active occupational or physical therapy that may impact motor function of the upper limb, Botulinum Toxin treatment within 3 months or Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy within 6 months of study enrollment, visual, cognitive or auditory limitations at a level that would interfere with gameplay, uncontrolled epilepsy or history of epilepsy related to video game play.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Bootle Blast
Bootle Blast is a series of 13 mini-games targeting different upper limb motor therapy goals. Bootle Blast is designed with many of the features of mainstream video games known to be appealing to young people. Game rewards are linked to meeting therapeutic objectives, such as daily play targets that are customizable to each child. Bootle Blast is played through movements of the upper limbs tracked via a low-cost camera/sensor (Microsoft Kinect, no hand-held controls needed). The movements required to play are customizable to each child's range of motion. Some of the mini-games are "mixed reality", where children interact and manipulate real-life objects (e.g. musical instruments, coloured building blocks) to play the game. The use of skeletal tracking and mixed reality enables both gross and fine motor skills to be practiced in line with each child's therapy goals and motor abilities.
During the baseline assessment, an occupational therapist will calibrate the video game to the child's therapy needs and functional abilities. Within a week of the first assessment, the research team will set up the video game in the participant's home where it will remain for 12 weeks. Training on how to play the game and a user manual will be provided. The researcher will work with each family to establish a play objective (minutes/day and days/week) that considers the family's schedule. Five-minute telephone check-in calls will be done weekly.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Video game logs
Time Frame: Through out the 12-week intervention.
Addresses research question 1. Every time the computer is turned on to play the video game, a video game log is automatically generated. The game logs active play time (i.e. time in minutes spent actively engaging in therapeutic movements) and passive play time (e.g. time spent navigating menus). Additional data that is recorded in game logs includes: game scores, games played and time in each game, rewards collected, and location of the joints (e.g. elbow, shoulder) as tracked by the Microsoft Kinect sensor. Data recorded in the video game will be used to identify the percentage of children that met their weekly play time goal, and on how many weeks this goal was achieved.
Through out the 12-week intervention.
Change in the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)
Time Frame: baseline (week 0), post-intervention (week 13), and follow-up (week 17)
Addresses research question 2. COPM evaluates self- or parent-reported satisfaction and performance on self-identified therapy goals. Participants will identify, with the help of the occupational therapists during the baseline assessment, 1-3 upper limb goals related to daily life activities (e.g., tie shoelaces). Parent and child will rate together performance and satisfaction with performance on a 10-point scale (1 is poor/low and 10 is good/high) for each goal.
baseline (week 0), post-intervention (week 13), and follow-up (week 17)
Change in the Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA)
Time Frame: baseline (week 0), post-intervention (week 13), and follow-up (week 17)
Addresses research question 2. The AHA evaluates the use of the affected hand in assisting during the performance of 22 bimanual activities. Each task is rated on a 4-point rating scale (4=effective, 0= does not do). Tasks include object manipulation from the AHA toy kit, which are scored under the categories of general use, arm use, grasp and release, fine motor adjustments and coordination and pace. Rasch analysis converts raw scores into a logit-based scale ranging from 0-100, with higher scores representing a higher ability.
baseline (week 0), post-intervention (week 13), and follow-up (week 17)
Semi-structured interviews
Time Frame: Post-intervention (week 13).
Addresses research question 3. Parent and child will participate in a post intervention semi-structured interview to explore features related to engagement and intervention acceptability.
Post-intervention (week 13).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in range of motion
Time Frame: baseline (week 0), post-intervention (week 13) and follow-up (week 17)
Active range of motion of the shoulder, elbow and wrist will be measured bilaterally via goniometer.
baseline (week 0), post-intervention (week 13) and follow-up (week 17)
Grip strength
Time Frame: baseline (week 0), post-intervention (week 13) and follow-up (week 17)
Assesses isometric muscular strength of the hand and forearm. Measured bilaterally via a hand-held dynamometer.
baseline (week 0), post-intervention (week 13) and follow-up (week 17)
Change in Box and Block test
Time Frame: baseline (week 0), post-intervention (week 13) and follow-up (week 17)
The test consists a wooden box with two compartments with a vertical division and 150 small cubes. Measures unilateral gross manual dexterity by asking the participant to pass the maximum number of cubes possible above the division, from one side to another, in 60 seconds.
baseline (week 0), post-intervention (week 13) and follow-up (week 17)
Change in Children's Hand-use Experience Questionnaire (CHEQ)
Time Frame: baseline (week 0), post-intervention (week 13) and follow-up (week 17)
Captures the child perceived quality and effectiveness of using their affected hand in 29 bilateral tasks. It can be completed by the parent or the child.
baseline (week 0), post-intervention (week 13) and follow-up (week 17)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Elaine Biddiss, PhD, Bloorview Research Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 9, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 15, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

March 15, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 14, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 3, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

July 5, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 25, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 21, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

No plan to share IPD

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Child

Clinical Trials on Bootle Blast

Subscribe